It's comparing subconscious memories of successful shots.
pj
chgo
I agree. Taking that idea further...what baseline reference does it use and pick out which memory to draw upon?
Best,
Mike
It's comparing subconscious memories of successful shots.
pj
chgo
I agree. Taking that idea further...what baseline reference does it use and pick out which memory to draw upon?
Best,
Mike
I'd guess that it matches amounts of CB/OB overlap with cut angles ("this amount of overlap = that cut angle"). That's not particularly sophisticated or analytical, more of a "brute force" method that takes advantage of the brain's phenomenal storage and search capacity.I agree. Taking that idea further...what baseline reference does it use and pick out which memory to draw upon?It's comparing subconscious memories of successful shots.Here's a question for the players that aim by looking at the contact point. How is your mind compensating for the ball curvature? Since you will undercut the ball after so many degrees, how is your mind actually compensating? Is it using fractional aiming without you knowing it? How about ghost ball aiming?
If ever there was a head scratcher about the mental part of pool, this is it. Your mind doesn't just guess and cut the ball thinner. It's a biological computer that takes in visual information and figures out which direction you need to send the cue ball. All without you even being aware it's doing this. What system is it using?
Best,
Mike
pj
chgo
Best,
Mike
I'd guess that it matches amounts of CB/OB overlap with cut angles ("this amount of overlap = that cut angle"). That's not particularly sophisticated or analytical, more of a "brute force" method that takes advantage of the brain's phenomenal storage and search capacity.
pj
chgo
I'm no neural specialist, but that's my guess.Interesting thought. So, if I'm aiming at the contact point, my brain is taking information from my visuals and doing something I am totally unaware of to get me to the correct alignment?
I think it's how we all find the final aim line, no matter what method or system we use to get close to it (fractions, fractions+pivot, ghost ball, contact points, whatever). When I say "aim by feel" or "fine-tune by feel", this is what I mean.I hate to say this but, :smile: could this be similar to what pivot systems employ?
One Pocket John says that he sees the OB and CB as disks - they look like disks.
In order to imagine the contact point on the OB that sends it to the pocket/target, one must imagine the OB as a sphere in order to imagine where the line from the pocket to the center of the OB and finally exits the side of the OB that you are looking at. Once you locate that spot, you can imagine the OB as a disk with the spot to the left or right of the center (straight in shot would be a spot in the center of the disk.
If you try to imagine the OB as a disk to find the contact point, it will always be in the center of the disk.
Alternatively, you can look at the top of the OB and see the line exiting the disk. Getting back to the shot from behind the CB, you can then see the spot (contact point) on the OB as a disk.
If you can imagine the same spot on the opposite side of the CB as a spot on the CB disk, for a cut on the OB to the right, all you have to do is aim the spot on the right side of the center on the OB disk to the spot on the left side of center on the OB. the tricky part is stroking your cue parallel to that spot to spot line.
I can see the simplicity of this description for aiming with that one caviat.
You can even use your stick to line up the shot:
View attachment 240443
Be well.
"Stick Aiming" or also known in another version called "Line Aiming" is very effective- i often wonder that s not being taught more often. (in combination with another system)
I'm not sure what you mean by "from a reference or starting point". Can you give an example?What about players that shoot by feel? What are their brains doing? Do they have a subconscious system? My point is that even if you consciously have no system to pocket balls, your brain is not guessing where to shoot the cue ball. It is a computer taking in all variables and from a reference or starting point, it comes up with an answer.
I'm not saying everybody uses an aiming system. Fahgedaboudit! I'd like to know what others think about their brain's method of lining up shots. By feel without an aiming system.
Best,
Mike
I'm not sure what you mean by "from a reference or starting point". Can you give an example?
pj
chgo
It all comes down to trail and error.
See shot.
Do shot.
Shot goes in.
See shot.
Do shot.
Shot does not go in.
Do what works. I know this sounds simple but this is how it works.
When I was first learning pool way back when, I went to the table, set up a shot and tried to put the CB where I thought it needed to be. It didn't take long to realized that where I hit the OB determined where the OB went. Back then, there was no internet and no where the amount of info on pool there is no days. Plus, there was no pool room where I lived. I learned at the rec center. I learned about pool on my own basically.
I then realized what a center pocket hit looked like and when I missed, I knew which way to adjust for the next shot.
Trail and error. Do this and see what happens. Try that and see what happens. The more misses you make, the better you will get. Missing is natures way of telling you you screwed up and don't do that again.
Somethings you have to do and the more you do it the better the feel for it. I do custom handles on kitchen knives. There are some blades that require the bolsters to be filed flat and square and the handle materiel side. There is a feel for when the file is working right. There is feel when you are moving the file in the right direction flat in the material.
When first learning to use a file, I was terrible. No feel for the file, no muscle memory for using a file. But the more I do it, the more feel I am getting and the better the muscle memory, the easier moving the file. Trail and error. I read about using a file, but not the same as doing.
Same with shot making, winning pool games. You got to do it, paying attention to what works and doesn't and just keep at it.
Yep, we have a subconscious aiming system whether we like it or not. Doesn't matter if we are shooting pool or throwing paper into a trashcan, we are constantly making adjustments based on past experiences.
I shot for many years with no formal aiming system, I wasn't even aware of CTE and similar concepts at the time. I always just pictured the overlap of the balls being at the right thickness to make the ball go in the direction of the pocket. Since I was more analytical I knew about things like CIT, deflection, etc., but many good players then (and now even) didn't and just learned to adjust for those things through experience. Other people might have envisioned the ghost ball, contact point, etc.
Since I am very analytical, I've enjoyed learning about and using the aiming systems, it makes me feel like I'm "guessing" less on where to hit the ball, and I can treat a straight in 2 foot shot the same as a 60 degree backcut using the same approach and steps just a different starting alignment and/or pivot for the category of shot at hand. It has worked better for me than just pure subconscious aiming, but it takes conscious thought and practice and that can actually mask your natural ability to feel certain shots and feel lost if you can't use the system for a given shot. I've played long enough where I can get around that, similar to in 3 cushion where I'll use systems if I can but am willing and capable of going "off the grid" for those specialty shots that come up that just require feel.
I look at it like throwing an object at something, whether it be a baseball into a mitt, paper into a trashcan, etc. Assuming you have some level of coordination, how many times can you just look at something quickly and throw an object pretty precisely right to that location? But if you stand there and try to do it, or someone is betting you that you can't do it, you take too much time and try to be too perfect and end up talking yourself out of your natural ability and miss? For me that's the difference between conscious and unconscious aiming.
Scott
It all comes down to trail and error.
See shot.
Do shot.
Shot goes in.
See shot.
Do shot.
Shot does not go in.
Do what works. I know this sounds simple but this is how it works.
When I was first learning pool way back when, I went to the table, set up a shot and tried to put the CB where I thought it needed to be. It didn't take long to realized that where I hit the OB determined where the OB went. Back then, there was no internet and no where the amount of info on pool there is no days. Plus, there was no pool room where I lived. I learned at the rec center. I learned about pool on my own basically.
I then realized what a center pocket hit looked like and when I missed, I knew which way to adjust for the next shot.
Trail and error. Do this and see what happens. Try that and see what happens. The more misses you make, the better you will get. Missing is natures way of telling you you screwed up and don't do that again.
Somethings you have to do and the more you do it the better the feel for it. I do custom handles on kitchen knives. There are some blades that require the bolsters to be filed flat and square and the handle materiel side. There is a feel for when the file is working right. There is feel when you are moving the file in the right direction flat in the material.
When first learning to use a file, I was terrible. No feel for the file, no muscle memory for using a file. But the more I do it, the more feel I am getting and the better the muscle memory, the easier moving the file. Trail and error. I read about using a file, but not the same as doing.
Same with shot making, winning pool games. You got to do it, paying attention to what works and doesn't and just keep at it.