Speculation?
What if they played, who is the best, etc. The very nature of pool will always lead to speculation on who is the best. None of them play each other enough to show a clear winner. One day this guy wins and the next day this guy wins, it never ends.
Shane is a very smart professional pool player and is consistently in the top earner category of reported earnings. He does all of this with out a backer as far as I know, but I am sure he has good sponsorship deals and invests his money wisely. He does not need to "gamble" with other peoples money to make a comfortable living.
I know of no other sport where the participants "gamble" against each other, in fact most sports prohibit it. Other sports compete for prize money or have a guaranteed salary and bonuses, yet many expect pool players to do it to prove who is the best. One match or an all around for 2 or 3 days may not prove any thing, unless your favorite happens to win that day. I prefer to look at the big picture, who has consistently won the most money in tournaments over the last 10 years?
Time is the test, who won most of the match ups between Dennis and Shane in the last 10 years? Shane does not need another Dennis beat down to cement his legacy in pool. His legacy is already in place and it is a good one.
About that hand shake, Shane has a good one, Dennis needs to work on his..........
What if they played, who is the best, etc. The very nature of pool will always lead to speculation on who is the best. None of them play each other enough to show a clear winner. One day this guy wins and the next day this guy wins, it never ends.
Shane is a very smart professional pool player and is consistently in the top earner category of reported earnings. He does all of this with out a backer as far as I know, but I am sure he has good sponsorship deals and invests his money wisely. He does not need to "gamble" with other peoples money to make a comfortable living.
I know of no other sport where the participants "gamble" against each other, in fact most sports prohibit it. Other sports compete for prize money or have a guaranteed salary and bonuses, yet many expect pool players to do it to prove who is the best. One match or an all around for 2 or 3 days may not prove any thing, unless your favorite happens to win that day. I prefer to look at the big picture, who has consistently won the most money in tournaments over the last 10 years?
Time is the test, who won most of the match ups between Dennis and Shane in the last 10 years? Shane does not need another Dennis beat down to cement his legacy in pool. His legacy is already in place and it is a good one.
About that hand shake, Shane has a good one, Dennis needs to work on his..........
Last edited: