Thanks, that's all I wanted to know. You can all go back to bickering now.
Bob Danielson
www.bdcuesandcomix.com
Bob Danielson
www.bdcuesandcomix.com
So, another page of bickering has gone on. Can no one answer my question about position play using english/draw/follow and cte?
Bob Danielson
www.bdcuesandcomix.com
Yeah that. I just don't get how the top proponents of this system cant seem to explain this. It's a rather simple yes/no, this or that type of question. Yet the only answer is, 'practice it more and you will get it.' I have to admit it worked for me very quickly, but I don't know why. It's confusing me.
Why circumvent the system after one viewing? Visual intelligence is the cornerstone. Using the correct visual alignment is the whole tamale. Any deviation...nevermind. How about NONSENSE? Your favorite word.
I knew this was coming. As if it really matters what you think about Cte. How about this? Prove Cte doesn't work. After all, you saw the dvd once. Should I start a new thread?
I'm not interested in proving anything about the system. The real problem here is that nobody, and I repeat NOBODY has been able to explain HOW it works. This is sticking in the collective craw. If you can't explain the system, it is easier to try to discredit it as not worthy of an explanation and maybe it'll go away. Its users are on the lowest level anyway, because we're too stupid to see it for what it really is.
We aren't smart enough to even understand your questions. NONSENSE! lol You have now become a source of amusement for all people who use Cte. We get it, but you can't. We've offered our help, but you sound like one of my kids when I confront them with something they did. "What?, HUH?, No way! I was just...(man, how can I get outta this one?)".
You're already pi$$ing and moaning. At least the other reviewer didn't ask for help before he nailed the dvd. C'mon, PJ! You've had a tack in your shoe for so long you look like a goalie for a dart team. I'm going upstairs to get some Prep H and get you off my mind.
Best,
Mike
If you mean "prove CTE isn't entirely systematic", that's already been proved. That's why you're pouting, isn't it?
pj
chgo
Quote:
Originally Posted by shankster8
Okay, let's accept that everyone sees different, which obviously refers to the supposed fact that each of us has a specific, unique vision center. Therefore, two person's eyes can be in different locations despite that each person has his vision center alligned with the CTEL - which in your language means everyone sees different.
We've been trying to pin down whether we are suposed to allign our eyes with the CTEL, the SL, neither or both, and whether actual movements of the vision center are involved. Your new explanation seems just as nebulous as your earlier description of the "eyes straddling the CTEL".
Obviously, since no one can even define the initial eye placement, feel must dictate that. Experience teaches you to locate your eyes such that the cueball edge alligns appropriately with A,B, or C, and you know in advance which aim point it is supposed to be . How else could Stan, using the same CTEL and without moving the balls or his head, see A once, and C another time? (See post 14). . . . . .
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JoeyA, I appreciate your efforts to help. Last nite you said you would review the shots I referred to in post 14, and you would get back on that - you haven't, yet. I honestly believe this is a major stumbling block to many people's understanding of CTE/ProOne. Remember, when Geno was preaching, you all agreed that there was a single "perfect" location for the eyes, and many of you claimed dramatic improvements in your games as a result of that discovery. Now, none of you have the courage to specify where the eyes are to be located relative to the CTEL etc. I pointed out in post 14 that Stan, using the same CTEL, and without moving the balls or his head, can See either Aim Point "A" or Aim Point "C". In other words, he manages to see the aim point he needs to see for the shot, because he's using feel and knows in advance which aim point is appropriate for the shot.
JoeyA, if you can please explain the above confusion, I honestly believe you will be doing a great service toward vindicating ProOne's exactness. If not, then I think you should quit being dramatic and simply admit that ProOne relies heavily on "feel". Like PJ, Dr. Dave, and others have said, that isn't necessarily bad, it still may help a lot of people to improve their game; but, ProOne either is or isn't exact, and most now understand it is not (including you and Spider, I believe, you just can't bring yourself to admit that yet.)
So JoeyA, please explain how Stan can see whichever aiming point he needs to, despite the fact no parameters having been changed. And then explain, where is the vision point supposed to be located relative to the CTEL, and SL. And joeyA don't take offense, let's just dig in and settle this.
In other words, the amount of pivot determines the amount of english. While being calculable mathematically it will change with each cue and length of bridge for each shot therefore is something that is learned by feel and experience. So, some peoples refusal to call this an exact aiming system seems well founded.
Bob Danielson
www.bdcuesandcomix.com
Quote:
Originally Posted by shankster8
Okay, let's accept that everyone sees different, which obviously refers to the supposed fact that each of us has a specific, unique vision center. Therefore, two person's eyes can be in different locations despite that each person has his vision center alligned with the CTEL - which in your language means everyone sees different.
We've been trying to pin down whether we are suposed to allign our eyes with the CTEL, the SL, neither or both, and whether actual movements of the vision center are involved. Your new explanation seems just as nebulous as your earlier description of the "eyes straddling the CTEL".
Obviously, since no one can even define the initial eye placement, feel must dictate that. Experience teaches you to locate your eyes such that the cueball edge alligns appropriately with A,B, or C, and you know in advance which aim point it is supposed to be . How else could Stan, using the same CTEL and without moving the balls or his head, see A once, and C another time? (See post 14). . . . . .
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JoeyA, I appreciate your efforts to help. Last nite you said you would review the shots I referred to in post 14, and you would get back on that - you haven't, yet. I honestly believe this is a major stumbling block to many people's understanding of CTE/ProOne. Remember, when Geno was preaching, you all agreed that there was a single "perfect" location for the eyes, and many of you claimed dramatic improvements in your games as a result of that discovery. Now, none of you have the courage to specify where the eyes are to be located relative to the CTEL etc. I pointed out in post 14 that Stan, using the same CTEL, and without moving the balls or his head, can See either Aim Point "A" or Aim Point "C". In other words, he manages to see the aim point he needs to see for the shot, because he's using feel and knows in advance which aim point is appropriate for the shot.
JoeyA, if you can please explain the above confusion, I honestly believe you will be doing a great service toward vindicating ProOne's exactness. If not, then I think you should quit being dramatic and simply admit that ProOne relies heavily on "feel". Like PJ, Dr. Dave, and others have said, that isn't necessarily bad, it still may help a lot of people to improve their game; but, ProOne either is or isn't exact, and most now understand it is not (including you and Spider, I believe, you just can't bring yourself to admit that yet.)
So JoeyA, please explain how Stan can see whichever aiming point he needs to, despite the fact no parameters having been changed. And then explain, where is the vision point supposed to be located relative to the CTEL, and SL. And joeyA don't take offense, let's just dig in and settle this.
The problem is, it has been described NUMEROUS times exactly where to put the eyes. But, people like you and p.j. are so bent on it not working that you can't even understand the simple parts. You refuse to understand. Because if you did finally understand, you would have to eat a lot of crow, and you aren't about to do that.
You want to say it's not an exact system. Well, I will say it again, it IS. It is because instead of one visual line of reference, which some can see differently, it gives you TWO lines of reference. Which puts your head exactly where it needs to be.
If some of you would actually go to a table and work at it a little, you would quickly understand what is being said. Instead of being on the table, you just want to be on here trying to be naysayers and doing nothing to help pool, just doing what you can to hurt pool and this forum.
Everything you need has been clearly spelled out just in this thread alone. If you don't understand it, you flat out aren't trying to. All this talk by you, p.j., and others is nothing more than showing what kind of people and just how willing you are to help others understand. It's not that you really don't or can't get it, it's just that you WON'T get it.
All you have to do is find the CTEL, then pick if you want A,B,or C. Where those two lines converge back to your eyes is an exact point. No feel at all. From there you get down on the shot, placing your tip 1/2 tip from center. Center is an exact spot on the cb. Then, just pivot back to center and shoot. No rocket science involved, nothing hard.
Which do you pick- A,B, or C? That is where time on the table comes in. Learning which one for different angles. Just like anything else, you have to put in some time on the table.
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . Which do you pick- A,B, or C? That is where time on the table comes in. Learning which one for different angles. Just like anything else, you have to put in some time on the table.
This is part of what has been stumbling me up. Thanks
Champ, doesn't look like you're alligned with the CTEL and, yes, it looks like left cue ball edge goes to B. Under similar circumstances, however, Stan can make the left cue ball edge go to A or B. That is the problem. How far you shift off the CTEL determines which aiming point you find, and foreknowledge or "feel" determines that.
I don't see why all the CTER's are so paranoid. The fact that CTE is not exact does not mean that it might not be the best aiming system out there. Cheer up.
Champ, doesn't look like you're alligned with the CTEL and, yes, it looks like left cue ball edge goes to B. Under similar circumstances, however, Stan can make the left cue ball edge go to A or B. That is the problem. How far you shift off the CTEL determines which aiming point you find, and foreknowledge or "feel" determines that.
I don't see why all the CTER's are so paranoid. The fact that CTE is not exact does not mean that it might not be the best aiming system out there. Cheer up.
While you guys are reviewing CTE, I'm putting out dozens of students who are ready to use CTE against you. Go figure.
randyg
It matters to many what PJ thinks about CTE, just as it matters to many what you think about it. People who read these threads do so because they want to examine both sides, not just one.
Roger
This is a good point and what I'm talking about. His review should be from the standpoint of a novice with an informational background. Not a player/user's opinion. His visual/physical concerns should be taken into consideration and if he wants more credibility on the subject, he should put out more than a cursory effort to learn the system.
The system is a learned technique, achieved in no specific time frame by individual users, limited by their present ability and DESIRE. It is not a system that demonstrates contact point aiming, specifically, that can be seen in a diagram.
An honest, fair assessment will only come with a committed effort on the reviewer's part. I love to play baseball, have coached high school level players and been a hitting coach. I've tried softball and didn't care for it. That doesn't mean it's not a great thing for somebody else. If I played it more, I would probably be a better judge. But if I don't play it, who cares about my opinion?
Best,
Mike