If you in fact get them, pay the service charge and cash them asap!!!
Let money mart eat the cost if they bounce.
Let money mart eat the cost if they bounce.
Egads! There's no shortage of posters to add to my Ignore list.smashmouth said:If you in fact get them, pay the service charge and cash them asap!!!
Let money mart eat the cost if they bounce.
I agree. Smashmouth represents the aspect of ignorant and overbearing criticism to which I have refered in earlier posts.PoolSharkAllen said:Egads! There's no shortage of posters to add to my Ignore list.![]()
Colin Colenso said:People come here hoping to read informative and well thought out arguments and developments. A bit of humor and wild speculation thrown in on occassion stimulates the mind, but this tendency to pollute the board with grandstanding statements is not useful and should not be endorsed by those who respect this forum as a source of information distribution.
There is an unwritten code of behavior when starting new threads. That being, that you have something new to contribute or that something raised on another thread may branch off into a new area of thought that justifies a new discussion thread.
Colin
True PSA,PoolSharkAllen said:Colin, I definitely agree with the points you've made about new threads, however, I think that those same general principles also apply to existing threads too. Whether it's an existing thread or a new one, posters should be contributing something of value.
Posting in this forum is a privilege which is sometimes being abused.
smashmouth said:If you in fact get them, pay the service charge and cash them asap!!!
Let money mart eat the cost if they bounce.
Ordinarily I would agree with you.Colin Colenso said:True PSA,
But if a comment within a thread is short and rather pointless, it is easily passed over.
When someone posts an entire new thread with a title "Now Official, No Funds before Chicago" and similar clap-trap, it just wastes more of most reader's time.
Colin
HERE HERE !Colin Colenso said:I agree. Smashmouth represents the aspect of ignorant and overbearing criticism to which I have refered in earlier posts.
He grandstands with innaccurate thread titles which contain little but a whine that would be more appropriately added as near pointless content within one of the many other relevant threads.
People come here hoping to read informative and well thought out arguments and developments. A bit of humor and wild speculation thrown in on occassion stimulates the mind, but this tendency to pollute the board with grandstanding statements is not useful and should not be endorsed by those who respect this forum as a source of information distribution.
There is an unwritten code of behavior when starting new threads. That being, that you have something new to contribute or that something raised on another thread may branch off into a new area of thought that justifies a new discussion thread.
The 3 recent thread starts by Smashmouth do not fit into those categories I believe. It's like he just strolled late into a party and jumped onto the dinner table to shout his simplistic opinions on what party goers had been discussing all evening.
Colin
I don't see your name on the list of IPT players. You shouldn't be one to talk.JamieMcWhorter said:Man how did you get on ipt anyhow besides lying about being a good player?Have you won a match yet???????????
Good luck and keep dreaming............Nice shooting Colin
JamieMcWhorter said:Man how did you get on ipt anyhow besides lying about being a good player?Have you won a match yet???????????
Good luck and keep dreaming............Nice shooting Colin
JamieMcWhorter said:Man how did you get on ipt anyhow besides lying about being a good player?Have you won a match yet???????????
Good luck and keep dreaming............Nice shooting Colin
As Steve said, my playing ability has nothing to do with this thread.JamieMcWhorter said:Man how did you get on ipt anyhow besides lying about being a good player?Have you won a match yet???????????
Good luck and keep dreaming............Nice shooting Colin