Hi Again,
Before Ernie's next batch of cues (don't know when), I thought it would be a good idea to get your thoughts on the format and see how the rules can be improved to accommodate everyone's wants & needs.
Currently, Ernie makes what he feels like making & those next up on the list buy them based on your list placement, first up gets 1st choice of all the cues, next up 2nd choice of remaining cues and on & on. You've all committed to buy at least one of his plain-jane cues at a minimum. Because of this if only a plain-jane remains & it's your turn, you must buy it or lose your place in line - even if you wanted a pointed cue. Only if you wanted a plain-jane were you able to not lose your place in line (you would then move to the top of the next batch to only get a plain-jane once available) because the plain-jane is the minimum & we didn't feel it was right to make someone who only wanted to spend $575 be forced to go higher.
This process was put in place to maintain the integrity of the list so it could be self maintained and Ernie sells all of the cues made - after all, this started to help Ernie get back on his feet, so again, thank you all for being so great.
What has happened in a few cases is that those wanting a fancier cue were forced to buy a plain-jane and get back on the list. How can we resolve this issue?
One suggestion is to create 2 separate lists: one for those wanting a plain-jane; and one for those wanting points. One problem with this is that Ernie may make a fancier cue that someone originally wanting a plain-jane just can't live without. In other words, if they are in the right position and want to change their minds, they would not be able to if there were two lists. Everyone would have to stay in his or her list choice for this to work. Also, for this to work (in my opinion) those looking for the fancier cues cannot pass & keep their place, they would have to swap their spot with someone from the next batch. Remember, these cues must be sold, which is the reason for the list. So you see, it's not as simple as it sounds & I need your help.
I would love to hear from those on the list to hear what you believe to be a good solution for this issue. We can always leave it alone, but I know there's always room for improvement and you are a creative bunch.
Thanks for your understanding,
Dave
Before Ernie's next batch of cues (don't know when), I thought it would be a good idea to get your thoughts on the format and see how the rules can be improved to accommodate everyone's wants & needs.
Currently, Ernie makes what he feels like making & those next up on the list buy them based on your list placement, first up gets 1st choice of all the cues, next up 2nd choice of remaining cues and on & on. You've all committed to buy at least one of his plain-jane cues at a minimum. Because of this if only a plain-jane remains & it's your turn, you must buy it or lose your place in line - even if you wanted a pointed cue. Only if you wanted a plain-jane were you able to not lose your place in line (you would then move to the top of the next batch to only get a plain-jane once available) because the plain-jane is the minimum & we didn't feel it was right to make someone who only wanted to spend $575 be forced to go higher.
This process was put in place to maintain the integrity of the list so it could be self maintained and Ernie sells all of the cues made - after all, this started to help Ernie get back on his feet, so again, thank you all for being so great.
What has happened in a few cases is that those wanting a fancier cue were forced to buy a plain-jane and get back on the list. How can we resolve this issue?
One suggestion is to create 2 separate lists: one for those wanting a plain-jane; and one for those wanting points. One problem with this is that Ernie may make a fancier cue that someone originally wanting a plain-jane just can't live without. In other words, if they are in the right position and want to change their minds, they would not be able to if there were two lists. Everyone would have to stay in his or her list choice for this to work. Also, for this to work (in my opinion) those looking for the fancier cues cannot pass & keep their place, they would have to swap their spot with someone from the next batch. Remember, these cues must be sold, which is the reason for the list. So you see, it's not as simple as it sounds & I need your help.
I would love to hear from those on the list to hear what you believe to be a good solution for this issue. We can always leave it alone, but I know there's always room for improvement and you are a creative bunch.
Thanks for your understanding,
Dave