"Madison" Bob Griffin: Failure to honor his commitments to a client.

Sev

I taut I saw a pussy cat!
Silver Member
---After much deliberation I have decided to post this thread. I fully expect to get flamed for it. However I believe the members of the billiards community should be made aware of my experience with Bob Griffin.

---I want to state first that Bob and I had very cordial relationship going until the last email I received from him. We talked many times on the phone and via email about the projects at hand as well as many other topics. There were at times some long gaps in communication.
---I am fully aware of his health issues and was not looking for my cues to be finished quickly. So I made allowances for the amount of time he was taking. I still wish him the best in getting control of his health as nobody should have to go through what he has and possibly still is.

---In 04 I sent Bob a National cue to convert. He had a lot of good ideas and I gave him his lead to build the cue. A deposit was sent. I got several updates saying things were going well. In March of 05 he apparently had the entire cue assembled and it was ready to be turned. At this point he discovers a problem with the points and the veneers. He tells me the indexing is off on the points. His inlays in the sleeve and points are not lining up. And that the points were 18 degrees out. He offered to send the cue back to me for inspection and to send me pics. He did neither. I suggested saving the handle and sleeve sections and replacing the forearm. He seemed to turn a deaf ear to the idea. The cue is toast by 3/11/05.
---In a phone conversation Bob tells me he has managed to recover a large portion of the materials and he would prefer not to ship the remains of the cue to me.
---I took all of this at face value at the time. I am well aware that converting cues can be problematical and told him so. I told him that I understood that some times things go awry. Taking Bobs word as gospel I offered him another shot at a second cue. I had a Titlist that had been disassemble and was ready to go and an old BBC Berger cue. We also discuss my original deposit of which I was not willing to give up.
---On 3-16-05 I ship both cues to him. He selects the BBC cue. We go over the details of the new project. One of which was to specifically leave the cue full spliced at all possible costs. I send him the specs I want the cue built to. To my knowledge the cue sits for quite a while untouched.
---This latest cue was to be relatively simple. Bob had thrown in a black center cut lizard wrap and was allowing another 100.00 in labor and materials for free due to the problems with the National cue. It was to have a Hoppe ring and an ebony sleeve. There was the possibility of some other ornamentation as well. I had also agreed to use the 3 shafts that were to come with the National conversion. I was only loosing 100 on my original deposit. I felt that was a fair deal.

---Jan 18-06 I asked Bob to ship the cues back to me as I believed that between his heath probs and backlog I didn't think he will be able to get to the conversion any time soon. He then convinced me not give up on him and to let him convert the cue. I begin discussing some possible ornamentation for the cue. Bob thinks I am changing the specs and says he has had to stop multiple times. He never indicated he was working on the cue. In one communication it appears he has cut the forearm off the butt. This turned out not to be the case.
---I once again clarify exactly what I want. And explain to him that his typing style, lack of proper grammar and punctuation at time make interpreting his emails difficult. The above occurs between Feb and March of 06 During this time I ask for pics of the cue. I never receive any. On feb 26-06 he says want s to get rolling on the cue as he has 2 other conversion going. He states he will be finished in 3 months.
---8-4-06 I hear hear from him. His health has prevented him from working on the cues for 4 months. He states his son is working on it.
---On or about 11-17-06 I get word from another party that due to health issues he may have closed his shop and I send out an inquiry and ask him to ship my cue back to me if this is the case. On 11-19-06 I receive a blistering response, with a promise that my property would be returned. It never was.
---That was my last communication.

---I would also like to state that in between this span of time Bob did a great restoration on a Scruggs Hustler cue and sold me a nicely crafted ziricote cue for a reasonable price. So my experience was not totally negative and were some of the reasons I stuck with him.

---I have made many overtures to Mr. Griffin by phone, email and PM. The most recent was last week. I have received no responses. I am not quite sure what has occurred. When taking into consideration the fact that he has serious health problems it was not unreasonable for me to conclude that it was a possibility he had to close his business. Jim Ward has done so for that very same reason.
---I have since discovered that Bob and our mutual friend had had a falling out. I have never inquired as to what occurred and to this date do not know. I get the distinct impression that I have been somehow drawn into something not of my making and am being punished for it.

---On the National cue, I have since made several inquires about what was described to me. I can neither confirm or deny that the cue actually had the problems as described to me. However I will give Bob the benefit of the doubt that something was amiss. However based on the information I have received since, I also believe that there may have been builder error involved as well.
---Unless I have grossly misinterpreted what was described to me I believe the problems with the forearm should have been noticeable if there had been a few passes made in the lathe to clean it up prior to it being mounted on the new handle. Points being 18 degrees out as stated on the email I reviewed should be noticeable to the naked eye. However I am willing to be corrected on this point.

---The cue building industry depends on a trusting and honest relationship with its customer base. We as customers are sending out cues and money to the craftsman with out so much as a contract. In todays day and age that requires an extreme amount of confidence in the individuals we are dealing with. Mr. Griffin has breached the trust of his client base. This should be a concern to everybody involved in the industry. Without our trust you don't have a business.

---Saying I am rather incensed about this situation would be an understatement. I have done my best not to castigate Bob in this thread and hope he will offer his side of the story. I for one would like an explanation. More over I would like to have my property and deposit back. Or the completed product so that we may finish out business.

---At the end of the day. Not matter what opinions are expressed on this thread I still have been unjustly wronged. I have lost time, money and cues dealing with Bob and I have not been offered and explanation as to why. I have dealt in good faith and I believe have made far more allowances than most would.

---Unless and until a suitable explanation is provided by Mr. Griffin and I receive that which is rightfully mine I would caution any body considering doing business with him to be exceedingly vigilant.

Sev
 
punctuation and thoughts

Sev,

You note that Bob's typing skills aren't the best. I doubt the points were 18 degrees out but a missing decimal point, 1.8 degrees out still causes nightmares and isn't nearly so easily seen by the naked eye. I'm not going to make any judgments just reading one side of the story but accepting your story at face value it seems that Bob has wanted to do what was right, tried to do what you wanted, and health issues prevented this being done in a timely manner.

I recently deeply discounting work leaving my shop because it wasn't done in a timely manner due to a health issue and I had to turn down other work. It is easy to get frustrated by a genuine lack of the health to do what you want and need to do and fire off an e-mail you would like to have not sent. I haven't done this but I have typed a few and managed to not hit send.

I suggest sending a snail mail letter or if possible having it given to Bob by a mutual friend laying out the options you have offered here to resolve the matter. Bob may have other suggestions that would make you even happier.

I would settle for the best speedy resolution to your issues and move on.

Wishing you both the best,
Hu




Sev said:
---After much deliberation I have decided to post this thread. I fully expect to get flamed for it. However I believe the members of the billiards community should be made aware of my experience with Bob Griffin.

Sev
 
Sev,

I wish this were the only story of it's kind in the asphalt jungle, but I'm afraid it's one that often goes untold for fear of retaliation. Whatever his circumstances, there is no excuse for this sort of negligence.

I hope Bob does the right thing and sends you back your cue.

Chris
 
to bad

sad story to hear. i hope you get all your stuff back and it is done right. i can tell you that the titlist conversion that i have of his is the nicest piece of work i have ever owned. it is sweet. i had it for sale but i think i will let it sit in unplayed condition. his work is awsome on mine although i bought it from a collector and did not have to deal with the b.s. good luck and keep us updated.
 
Why not pay him a personal "visit"... is'nt that what you would do with any other business venture gone awry?
 
Sorry to hear of Your troubles, and hope everything works out for the better.

My comment is mainly on the indexing mentioned with the first cue. Just to say I have experienced the indexing being off Myself before with some older short blanks I had. My advice is keep any stitch rings as far away from inlays as possible, and try to split the difference if they don't line up, altough probably better not to even use them, and go with solid rings instead. Also when inlaying inside the points you cannot trust your indexing just By marking one of the inlays out, and dialing in on that for the rest of the inlays using your indexer. They may be off in the indexing this way, but if you want them to look right, You have to mark the centers of each point out, and set the center lines up for each one individually before cutting the pocket. Otherwise some will be centered with the points and others will be closer to one side. Basically the more detailed the design, the more of an issue it creates when the points are off like that. Greg
 
ShootingArts said:
It is easy to get frustrated by a genuine lack of the health to do what you want and need to do and fire off an e-mail you would like to have not sent. I haven't done this but I have typed a few and managed to not hit send.

I suggest sending a snail mail letter or if possible having it given to Bob by a mutual friend laying out the options you have offered here to resolve the matter. Bob may have other suggestions that would make you even happier.

I would settle for the best speedy resolution to your issues and move on.

Wishing you both the best,
Hu

Tap Tap Tap. Tried to give rep but need to spread it first.

Very reasonable point of view and suggestions. When I'm tempted to scream at someone via email I get it typed up and then put it in the "draft" folder for a day or two to see if I really want to put that out there.

Sev: Hu's post might lead you to resolution. Hope you find peace with this.
 
ShootingArts said:
Sev,

You note that Bob's typing skills aren't the best. I doubt the points were 18 degrees out but a missing decimal point, 1.8 degrees out still causes nightmares and isn't nearly so easily seen by the naked eye. I'm not going to make any judgments just reading one side of the story but accepting your story at face value it seems that Bob has wanted to do what was right, tried to do what you wanted, and health issues prevented this being done in a timely manner.

I recently deeply discounting work leaving my shop because it wasn't done in a timely manner due to a health issue and I had to turn down other work. It is easy to get frustrated by a genuine lack of the health to do what you want and need to do and fire off an e-mail you would like to have not sent. I haven't done this but I have typed a few and managed to not hit send.

I suggest sending a snail mail letter or if possible having it given to Bob by a mutual friend laying out the options you have offered here to resolve the matter. Bob may have other suggestions that would make you even happier.

I would settle for the best speedy resolution to your issues and move on.

Wishing you both the best,
Hu

---Please don't misinterpret what I am saying. I am not saying Bobs craftsmanship is poor. From what I have seen of it personally I believe its excellent. It's one of the reasons I sent the other cues to him. However things can go awry in every industry including this one. I originally said this exact thing to Bob. However over time I have talked to other individuals who have offered other plausible explanations.
---The 18 degrees comes directly from an email from Bob. Perhaps he meant 1.8 but that is not what Bob wrote.
---I don't doubt that he was trying to do his best on that cue. He sent a detailed description on what was going into it when he discovered the problem with the cue.
---Believe me I have several drafts of some flowery emails I have never sent to Bob. If I had done so the door to reconciling this would be closed forever.
---I fully understand Bobs health issues. I have always wished him well and still do. I had said to him that if he could not get to the second cue he was not obligated too and I would understand. Not being able to get to the work has never been an issue to me.

---Being ignored and not returning my property to me is.
 
Cue Crazy said:
Sorry to hear of Your troubles, and hope everything works out for the better.

My comment is mainly on the indexing mentioned with the first cue. Just to say I have experienced the indexing being off Myself before with some older short blanks I had. My advice is keep any stitch rings as far away from inlays as possible, and try to split the difference if they don't line up, altough probably better not to even use them, and go with solid rings instead. Also when inlaying inside the points you cannot trust your indexing just By marking one of the inlays out, and dialing in on that for the rest of the inlays using your indexer. They may be off in the indexing this way, but if you want them to look right, You have to mark the centers of each point out, and set the center lines up for each one individually before cutting the pocket. Otherwise some will be centered with the points and others will be closer to one side. Basically the more detailed the design, the more of an issue it creates when the points are off like that. Greg

---Bob described something similar. Though from what I can deciphered from the email he had already cut some of the pockets and placed the inlays. He was having alinement probs and fiddling with ringwork. It was one of those emails that is a tough read do to his writing style.
 
CaptiveBred said:
Why not pay him a personal "visit"... is'nt that what you would do with any other business venture gone awry?

---I am in NY and he is in Indy. He had invited me to his shop several times. I doubt that offer is still open.
 
See if I'm reading this right... it's been nearly 11 months since you've heard from him? And you've tried many times to get a response? If that's the case ''Madison'' Bob Griffin needs to take care of this situation, right away!

The first thing for him to do is post his side of the story, here and now on AZ.
 
Charlie Edwards said:
See if I'm reading this right... it's been nearly 11 months since you've heard from him? And you've tried many times to get a response? If that's the case ''Madison'' Bob Griffin needs to take care of this situation, right away!

The first thing for him to do is post his side of the story, here and now on AZ.

That is correct.

---All I am asking is for my deposit and property back in as in good a condition as I sent it or the completed project. From my stand point it is pretty cut and dried. My emails are all the same as are my phone numbers. He has ever access to me available.
---He may have been offended by asking about the status of his business. However based on what I knew at the time I believe it was a legitimate question.
 
Sev said:
---The 18 degrees comes directly from an email from Bob. Perhaps he meant 1.8 but that is not what Bob wrote.

Sev,

You can't acknowledge Bob's issues with punctuation and typing in general and then assume that what he wrote here wasn't missing a decimal point without confirmation. Ignoring anything else, you would have to have been blind to send a stick off with a point 18 degrees out to be converted. That would stick out like a sore thumb.

Aside from Bob's typing issues, for a point to be 18 degrees off Bob would have had to miscounted points or set his machinery up for the wrong number of points. Neither impossible but both very unlikely. As we both agree, Bob is a skilled craftsman and it is extremely unlikely that an 18 degree runout could have snuck by his first casual inspection. I'm not going back to reread but I'm not sure 18 degrees of runout is even possible if we are talking a full splice butt. 1.8 degrees can sneak by anyone unless they are very careful. Once the pockets are cut the blank, in this case your original cue, is ruined unless the pockets are small enough that larger pockets can be cut over them at the correct angle which is rarely the case.

Sev said:
---Believe me I have several drafts of some flowery emails I have never sent to Bob. If I had done so the door to reconciling this would be closed forever.

Here is a fine example of misinterpretation. Very few readers, if any other than yourself, thought I was talking about an e-mail from you. You have mentioned an e-mail from Bob being a final straw along with lack of communication and follow through on what you feel had been agreed to. When I wrote of e-mails that someone might wish they had never sent I was thinking about Bob's not any of yours that haven't been mentioned if they exist. The context made that very plain to most readers. Normally I am sure it would be plain to you as well but here your emotions are involved and you are expecting criticism and attacks.

Sev said:
Not being able to get to the work has never been an issue to me.

---Being ignored and not returning my property to me is.

This I do understand and fully agree with. Lack of communication is usually a big part of the story any time someone is unhappy with their dealings with someone. Not being able to get your own property back is another major irritation although I can see Bob's side that sending you a bag of pieces isn't a pleasant solution for him. I suspect that he was still hoping to get the project out in a short time after your latest communication. However agreeing to ship something back and not following through isn't acceptable.

I will close this with a disclaimer. Everything I am saying is still based on your version of events. As the part of our posts about e-mails indicates, long distance communication can be tricky. Once one person goes public we can only hope that the other person speaks, not to defend themselves but so that we have a more complete story. Of course a "situation resolved we are both satisfied" post is nice too but leaves all the readers guessing and unfortunately some make assumptions.

Still wishing you both the best,
Hu
 
ShootingArts said:
Sev,

You can't acknowledge Bob's issues with punctuation and typing in general and then assume that what he wrote here wasn't missing a decimal point without confirmation. Ignoring anything else, you would have to have been blind to send a stick off with a point 18 degrees out to be converted. That would stick out like a sore thumb.

Aside from Bob's typing issues, for a point to be 18 degrees off Bob would have had to miscounted points or set his machinery up for the wrong number of points. Neither impossible but both very unlikely. As we both agree, Bob is a skilled craftsman and it is extremely unlikely that an 18 degree runout could have snuck by his first casual inspection. I'm not going back to reread but I'm not sure 18 degrees of runout is even possible if we are talking a full splice butt. 1.8 degrees can sneak by anyone unless they are very careful. Once the pockets are cut the blank, in this case your original cue, is ruined unless the pockets are small enough that larger pockets can be cut over them at the correct angle which is rarely the case.



Here is a fine example of misinterpretation. Very few readers, if any other than yourself, thought I was talking about an e-mail from you. You have mentioned an e-mail from Bob being a final straw along with lack of communication and follow through on what you feel had been agreed to. When I wrote of e-mails that someone might wish they had never sent I was thinking about Bob's not any of yours that haven't been mentioned if they exist. The context made that very plain to most readers. Normally I am sure it would be plain to you as well but here your emotions are involved and you are expecting criticism and attacks.



This I do understand and fully agree with. Lack of communication is usually a big part of the story any time someone is unhappy with their dealings with someone. Not being able to get your own property back is another major irritation although I can see Bob's side that sending you a bag of pieces isn't a pleasant solution for him. I suspect that he was still hoping to get the project out in a short time after your latest communication. However agreeing to ship something back and not following through isn't acceptable.

I will close this with a disclaimer. Everything I am saying is still based on your version of events. As the part of our posts about e-mails indicates, long distance communication can be tricky. Once one person goes public we can only hope that the other person speaks, not to defend themselves but so that we have a more complete story. Of course a "situation resolved we are both satisfied" post is nice too but leaves all the readers guessing and unfortunately some make assumptions.




Still wishing you both the best,
Hu

---On the National cue I agree about the 18 degrees. It should be obvious to see. The points looked straight to my the eye prior to shipping. I did not mic it out though. However the way he described it to me the points were wrapping around the forearm of the cue when he turned it. I also had phone conversations with him about this. I did also suggest to him to chuck the forearm and replace it with new it such was possible.
---Also on the National cue. I do not expect it back. To my knowledge he dismantled it and threw out what was left. Prior to that he did offer to send the cue to me for inspection and to send pics. Neither occurred. Sorry if there was any confusion about that.

---The cue I do expect back is the BBC Berger cue I sent him. To my knowledge there were absolutely no problems with the project. It was going smoothly.

---You are correct there is an amount of emotion involved here. Heated emails can go both ways though. I did see what you were saying and was responding in agreement. I do understand that people are not their best when ill and knee jerk reactions can occur.

---I would very much like to get this resolved. I have no doubt that the BBC cue was going to be a beauty. If Bob and I can get on the same page and iron everything out, I might be willing to do business with him again in the future.
 
good luck to both

Good luck to both of you. Communications would be a good start. Hopefully you and Bob will get back together and resolve something. Do let us know if and when this happens.

Hu


Sev said:
---On the National cue I agree about the 18 degrees. It should be obvious to see. The points looked straight to my the eye prior to shipping. I did not mic it out though. However the way he described it to me the points were wrapping around the forearm of the cue when he turned it. I also had phone conversations with him about this. I did also suggest to him to chuck the forearm and replace it with new it such was possible.
---Also on the National cue. I do not expect it back. To my knowledge he dismantled it and threw out what was left. Prior to that he did offer to send the cue to me for inspection and to send pics. Neither occurred. Sorry if there was any confusion about that.

---The cue I do expect back is the BBC Berger cue I sent him. To my knowledge there were absolutely no problems with the project. It was going smoothly.

---You are correct there is an amount of emotion involved here. Heated emails can go both ways though. I did see what you were saying and was responding in agreement. I do understand that people are not their best when ill and knee jerk reactions can occur.

---I would very much like to get this resolved. I have no doubt that the BBC cue was going to be a beauty. If Bob and I can get on the same page and iron everything out, I might be willing to do business with him again in the future.
 
DrCue'sProtege said:
what exactly is wrong with Bob?

DCP

---I don't know what is causing his medical condition. He once told me his doctors didn't know the cause either. Perhaps that has changed in the past year.
---I do hope they figure it out.
 
ShootingArts said:
Good luck to both of you. Communications would be a good start. Hopefully you and Bob will get back together and resolve something. Do let us know if and when this happens.

Hu

Huston we have contact. :)
 
Back
Top