Taking photos at tournaments

calcuttaman

Pool Player
Silver Member
Are there any legal or etiquette issues with taking photos at pool tournaments? Some questions...

Do you have to (or should you) ask the tournament director if its ok to take photos?

Do you have to (or should you) ask players if you can take there photo?

Do your answers change for the above if you are going to post those photos to your own blog or to a site such as azbilliards.com?
 
I can speak on some of this, as I was doing just that this past weekend.

Pretty much all the people I took photos of, I took a casual photo of first - i.e. not while they're shooting, but while we're talking, and I pull out the camera. The other person will either immediately go into pose-mode or do/say something that says "please don't take my pic". If someone was good with the normal standing-around type photo, I knew they were fine with "action" shots.

In my case, the vast majority of folks I was taking photos of were fellow AZBers, so it was pretty much a given I was gonna post'em on the net. But with other folks, it's always best to mention your plan ahead of time.

Shots taken during play - first off, NO FLASH. :D I took a shot of Joey and mistakingly didn't turn the flash off - Joey I hope it didn't distract you - but another tournament player, sitting nearby and watching some matches, laid into me. I felt bad, and made sure my flash was off for the rest of the weekend. (That guy and I chatted later, he apologized for getting in my face, I said no problem, I had it coming, all was good.)

The TD folks will usually announce if it's alright to take photos or not. If not, then yeah, it's a good idea to ask.

One thing I realized - my little handheld digital camera really is NOT suited for tournament photography. It's got a zoom, but it's pathetic. With a proper rig, you can be halfway across a room and zoom down on someone a few tables away and get a great shot, and you're much less likely to be in that player's field of focus, hence a much reduced chance of your snapping a pic distracting your subject's shot.
 
Last edited:
ScottW said:
One thing I realized - my little handheld digital camera really is NOT suited for tournament photography. It's got a zoom, but it's pathetic.
You're right. The key is to collect as much light as possible in the low light situation presented at a typical tournament...and the little lens on most digital cameras just ain't gonna do it. That's why you see those guys lugging around a coffee can sized lens at the pro tourneys.
 
Everyone stop!! There is no reason for 160 photographers to take 48000 photos at a pool tournament. You are just a distraction to pros and fans too.
 
mosconiac said:
You're right. The key is to collect as much light as possible in the low light situation presented at a typical tournament...and the little lens on most digital cameras just ain't gonna do it. That's why you see those guys lugging around a coffee can sized lens at the pro tourneys.

What you say is true, but it is possible to get reasonably good results (not pro quality for sure) by digitally enhancing the photos, as long as the subject and camera are motionless.

Steve
 
calcuttaman said:
Are there any legal or etiquette issues with taking photos at pool tournaments? Some questions...

Do you have to (or should you) ask the tournament director if its ok to take photos?

Do you have to (or should you) ask players if you can take there photo?

Do your answers change for the above if you are going to post those photos to your own blog or to a site such as azbilliards.com?

First off, almost any event where you will be watching pro/semi-pro pool will be a private venue (even if it is in a public space, it is likely rented out by *someone*).

That being said it is 100% legal in america to take pictures from any public space, in a private location (even one publicly accessible) it is a bit of a judgement call. In a pool hall, unless posted you can reasonably assume photography is permitted. If you are at some big banks corporate headquarters, you can reasonably assume photography is not permitted. If it is reasonable to assume it's permitted - you can't really get in trouble for it if no one (as of yet) has told you not to/to stop.

There is much discussion on this if you read photo discussions (say on flickr), but in general you can take pictures anywhere unless someone (who has the proper right to do so) tells you otherwise.

This link provides an excellent one pager going over basic photographers rights: http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm.

On to your specific questions: You don't *have* to ask the TD...that goes with judgement calls. If ESPN is doing an event...probably a good idea to ask. At your local regional tour - probably not a big deal (it's unlikely they'd be banning photos). Incidentally - if you want to get pictures, and you can reasonably assume it's ok - don't ask. Asking is always going to make people think about it...and at best you will still be allowed and at worst you wont!

Same thing goes with taking photos of people - in general you are always allowed to in a public place, or a private place if it's reasonable assumed they don't have a right to privacy. That's how the paparazzi get away with it - if you can't expect to have privacy you don't get it. If you are in a pro tour stop...it's not like you are expecting any privacy!

Etiquitte: At an *event* you shouldn't need to ask people, they are there, they expect there will be some audience - nuff said. Taking candids off the table is another question - some people are really sensitive about it - even though it is still legal.

In general the answers don't change if you aren't selling the photos or using them for commercial purposes. So putting them up on a personal blog, or posting them in a public forum is ok. Putting them up on the AZ main site not ok. You might think that if you simply give the photos to AZ, say because it is such an awesome photo, it's ok - but it's still helping AZ to sell advertising which means the work is causing increased revenue = same as selling outright (you don't get cash for your pictures, but AZ maybe gets more revenue as a result of the picture on the front page).

If you think you might want to use the photo in ways that might not fit the above - you can download a standard model release contract and have people sign it. Low ranked pros probably wont mind - high ranked people will - as they actually have an image to protect.

As far as actual working etiquette:

1) ABSOLUTELY no flash - test fire your camera in whatever mode you will be shooting in. Be sure that if you turn it off it comes back on in the same mode (or with the flash still off). If you are ever unsure of these things, take some heavy black cloth over the flash in case it does go off. Or tape it down if it's a pop up type.

2) Unless you are in a venue that is lit for television it is unlikely your pocket digicam is going to get a decent picture (and if it's lit for television...there's a good chance you wont be allowed anyway:)

3) If you actually want decent pictures: buy a semi decent SLR (even the entry level canon/nikon/sony/etc DSLR's are fine - you can pick one up for around 400 now or less for a used one). Then the bigger, more important thing - get a fast lens - if you really want fantastic event pictures you'll end up spending more on the lens than the camera most likely (if I had the money to spend I'd be bringing two canon lenses with me that cost around 1100 and 1600 - far more than my camera). I usually use a fast prime which works well, just don't have any zoom:( Especially with the pros you can get away with a slower lens with IS - because a good player will be rock solid still during the shooting motion a slower shutter speed will suffice.

3a) If you want to use a pocket digicam - try and get one that at least enables manual mode - then you can futz with shutter speed vs ISO and try and get some nicer pictures.

4) I found that after a few events I got bored of taking pictures - they pretty much all end up the same - how many times do you want to see XYZ famous player bent down over a shot - there's really no difference. I go for some artistic shots now and then, or maybe the victory shot (someone posted a great photo of Earl fist pumping after his 9 racks in a row win to avoid getting bumped from the WPC today). The action shots can be more fun - but then you need a tripod - and it's more likely you wont be allowed to use a tripod than photography in general (reasons can range from the tripod being obtrusive, getting in people's way and they tend to only let the "professional" photographers use them - the MTA is like that about subway photography - ok to shoot handheld - not ok to use a tripod).

Also keep in mind - *even* if they say no photography - they can't make you give them your camera/film/memory card - the best they can do is ask you to leave. Keep in mind that's not trespassing - it's only trespassing if you don't leave or come back.

I think it's lame when they don't let audience members take photos - as people lament all the time, pool is not the most popular/glamorous/profitable sport around - anything that acts to inhibit the spread of pool is sad. I went to Mohegan Sun to watch the challenge of champions and ESPN decreed no photography (after I went through hoops with the casino security to manage to get my camera to the pool arena!). It's not like they took a million photos and posted them for the fans - there was barely any photography to be had at the event:(
 
Fragged said:
Everyone stop!! There is no reason for 160 photographers to take 48000 photos at a pool tournament. You are just a distraction to pros and fans too.

This I tend to agree with in some respects. While an SLR takes grea pictures - it does have an audible shutter noise. And unfortunately the times when you want to shoot pictures are usually right around when the player is actually shooting! I took some pictures of Tony Robles playing Thorsten Hohmann in the recent 14.1 NJ State Championship - that was one really quiet room. I think at least once Tony must have heard the noise (even though I was a good 20 feet back from the table!). I did not take so many pictures after that.
 
most professionals choose to use a 70-200mm f/2.8 ($1700) which lets you shoot from a decent distance so noise (audible) wouldn't really be a problem. if you're up in the front row, i'd pefer a fast 50mm, maybe a f/1.2 ($1400) so i could keep the iso as low as possible and reduce noise (visible). most camera aren't really loud enought to actually distract someone though... definitely not as loud as if someone were say... clearing their throat or something... more like a faint mumble in the crowd.
 
branpureza said:
most professionals choose to use a 70-200mm f/2.8 ($1700) which lets you shoot from a decent distance so noise (audible) wouldn't really be a problem. if you're up in the front row, i'd pefer a fast 50mm, maybe a f/1.2 ($1400) so i could keep the iso as low as possible and reduce noise (visible). most camera aren't really loud enought to actually distract someone though... definitely not as loud as if someone were say... clearing their throat or something... more like a faint mumble in the crowd.

Yep that was my $1600 lens reference - discounts until the end of the year! If anyone reading this is thinking of lens purchases though - from the closer shots - the Canon 50mm f/1.8 is almost as fast and only about $80 - fantastic value...
 
juggler314 said:
Yep that was my $1600 lens reference - discounts until the end of the year! If anyone reading this is thinking of lens purchases though - from the closer shots - the Canon 50mm f/1.8 is almost as fast and only about $80 - fantastic value...


i've got a canon 50mm f/1.4 that i'd let go for around $250.00 :)
 
My D200 with 18-200mm VR lens does great. So far hasn't caused any problems with anyone...
:p
 
rayjay said:
My D200 with 18-200mm VR lens does great. So far hasn't caused any problems with anyone...
:p

i used to have that same setup when i shot with nikon... for the money, it's hard to beat. that lens might be a little too slow sometimes if the tournament doesn't offer much light.
 
sixpack said:
I'm just waiting for my new D3 to get here. THEN look out! :D

RC

D3... nice. it's about time nikon gave in and put out a full frame camera. i just sold my canon 5D on ebay... gonna put the photography on hold till i finish school. just haven't had the time to shoot much lately. plus i wanted a new cue so i didn't mind selling it at all...
 
I would rather have my pic taken with the player in the hall or somewhere outside the tourney area. If I want some good pics of pros shooting I can swipe em from AZ :D
Just kiddin,
 
branpureza said:
D3... nice. it's about time nikon gave in and put out a full frame camera. i just sold my canon 5D on ebay... gonna put the photography on hold till i finish school. just haven't had the time to shoot much lately. plus i wanted a new cue so i didn't mind selling it at all...

This camera is revolutionary from what I can tell. It will change the way I work and I think it will change my whole industry.

I have never been so excited to spend 5 grand in my life.

I was trying to explain it to a friend last night (pool player) and I said, 'if you're a professional pool player and there's a new cue that will help you make 15%-25% more of the shots you miss, but it costs $5000 would you buy it?"

"If you're a professional golfer and you could buy a putter that will help you make 15% more putts from 10-20' would you buy it?"

Absolutely.

It is going to be such an improvement in music, weddings and sports photography and I think will probably make a huge impact in pool if anyone who covers pool buys one.

Imagine being able to shoot in a dark tournament venue using available light at f6-8 1/200th of a second with no noise and great color rendition.

Last tournament I took my camera (d200) to I was shooting 1/30 sec f 2.8 with VR at 800 ISO...which had some noise and some motion blur.

Pool tourneys you can sit there with your monopod/tripod and take a lot of shots to try and get some where they weren't moving etc...but at a wedding, that's a whole different story. The bride only walks down the aisle once...and you'd better get it.

Just curious, how much did you get for your 5d?

Cheers,
RC
 
Pictures from the recent 14.1 NJ State Open

As long as we are on the topic:)

Tony in the background - trophies in the foreground:




Immediately after shooting, the 4 hasn't quite dropped into the pocket yet:




Tony's intense concentration:





Sizing up a break shot:


 
i got $1900 for the 5D which was pretty good considering i ordered it from b&h for like $2100 brand new. my friend had the mark III and that thing is... wow. 10 frames per second and the buffer holds like 100 images. can't wait to see what the future holds... in a few years cameras will probably have the ability to take pictures in 3d haha.



sixpack said:
This camera is revolutionary from what I can tell. It will change the way I work and I think it will change my whole industry.

I have never been so excited to spend 5 grand in my life.

I was trying to explain it to a friend last night (pool player) and I said, 'if you're a professional pool player and there's a new cue that will help you make 15%-25% more of the shots you miss, but it costs $5000 would you buy it?"

"If you're a professional golfer and you could buy a putter that will help you make 15% more putts from 10-20' would you buy it?"

Absolutely.

It is going to be such an improvement in music, weddings and sports photography and I think will probably make a huge impact in pool if anyone who covers pool buys one.

Imagine being able to shoot in a dark tournament venue using available light at f6-8 1/200th of a second with no noise and great color rendition.

Last tournament I took my camera (d200) to I was shooting 1/30 sec f 2.8 with VR at 800 ISO...which had some noise and some motion blur.

Pool tourneys you can sit there with your monopod/tripod and take a lot of shots to try and get some where they weren't moving etc...but at a wedding, that's a whole different story. The bride only walks down the aisle once...and you'd better get it.

Just curious, how much did you get for your 5d?

Cheers,
RC
 
3d

branpureza said:
can't wait to see what the future holds... in a few years cameras will probably have the ability to take pictures in 3d haha.


Nikon's already have that feature.....

88479100.jpg


Just kidding! Took this shot 2 weeks ago south of Cancun.

Rick S.
 
Back
Top