I like what you said. I was going to say when they can beat the 9 ball ghost regularly, but I like your definition much better.I think a real player is someone that fully dedicates themselves to getting better and to understanding the game.
I see a lot of league players who, just upon watching them play or speaking to them, you can tell only play pool as a hobby or as something to just "do."
However, I've met a few people who I would consider real players (some are SL 5s, others are SL 7s) because you can tell they are immersed in the game. I don't think you have to be a master of the table to be a real player - but if you aspire to be one someday and are willing to put in the time to be one then I consider them a real player.
If we are talking real players based on technical skill then I'd say it's in the way they shoot: steady rhythm, fearless shooter, strategic thinker, and can handle problems and clusters, or move through a rack pretty seamlessly. Most league players don't exhibit those qualities, but I think real players do noticeably exhibit these qualities.
-Richard
The term "player" gets thrown around a bit, as opposed to "wannabe player" or such. At what point do you consider somebody a "real player"?
If I had to take my pick, I'd say that it's at the point where they beat me more often than not! :embarrassed2:
No...when they beat you more often than not they're called a barbanger.
I think a real player is someone that fully dedicates themselves to getting better and to understanding the game.
I see a lot of league players who, just upon watching them play or speaking to them, you can tell only play pool as a hobby or as something to just "do."
However, I've met a few people who I would consider real players (some are SL 5s, others are SL 7s) because you can tell they are immersed in the game. I don't think you have to be a master of the table to be a real player - but if you aspire to be one someday and are willing to put in the time to be one then I consider them a real player.
If we are talking real players based on technical skill then I'd say it's in the way they shoot: steady rhythm, fearless shooter, strategic thinker, and can handle problems and clusters, or move through a rack pretty seamlessly. Most league players don't exhibit those qualities, but I think real players do noticeably exhibit these qualities.
-Richard
Its kind of cryptic subject, as in if you have to ask...........
BTW, Im fiending again..... :grin:
Chuck
John,
Been banging balls for over 56 years. Even today, I'm not sure I'm a "player". Guess your question is really too fundamental. If winning big events or big money gambling is the only valid description of a "player", there are way too few of them. If the description includes someone who; 1) Hates to lose. 2) Loves to win. 3) Devotes too much of their life to the game, then I guess I'm a "player". What's your description?
Lyn
PS Got beat by a bunch of old, old men last week .
The term "player" gets thrown around a bit, as opposed to "wannabe player" or such. At what point do you consider somebody a "real player"?
:
I player is someone who plays and doesn't stand around talking. They don't have to be a champion but they can play their speed when it counts. Even against top players if they get a good game the top player does not have to like it.The term "player" gets thrown around a bit, as opposed to "wannabe player" or such. At what point do you consider somebody a "real player"?
If I had to take my pick, I'd say that it's at the point where they beat me more often than not! :embarrassed2:
I'll never know. (And likely won't care.)