This will open up something that I never wanted to, so be warned that I'll end up sounding like Hal Houle after all is said and done, but maybe there will be gold at the end of the rainbow. If you're attitude is to disprove any system I'm talking about, I have no interest. I want to share what I learned from Hal. And many of you know that when I was playing a lot, I've got the tournament wins to say that something worked. I give Hal a lot of credit for helping put my game into the winner's circle much more often.
I talked with Hal a few times. He even called me a couple of times, which is something that makes me feel really honored. This was an aging man who took the effort to call me to share something. He'd always put his phone number out there to call him, but a call form him to me? Yeah, it's special.
I started with the Small Ball, and after a few hours of it, I discovered why he would say that the relationship from the cueball to the object would change and rotate (revolve might be more correct). When I called him, and told him that I finally understood what he was saying,he gave me permission to talk about his system. At that time, he said I was the first. I don't know if he was being wholly honest, and maybe he was talking about internet posters.
Hal's biggest weakness was his inability to explain what he was talking about. His concern was that several people were talking/teaching his systems, and that they didn't quite understand what Hal was saying. He only told people that they could teach his system once he (Hal) was sure that they really got the rotating ball-to-ball relationship is that concept.
Once he was convinced I got it (and there were some trigger words I used that he was waiting for me to say), he gave me the second secret, which I didn't see him ever write on any post: you can add more reference points. That is, there are more than three angles or two references.
Yes, you can add more reference points, but if you didn't get the concept of rotating spheres, he'd never tell you this. But before you get all gloaty, if you come up with more than five, you're not doing his system. There's no infinite number of reference points in his systems. There's a point of diminishing returns if you try to keep adding reference points.
I decided to write this post because in recent months, I've been explaining some Houle concepts, but I found myself saying several things, which old internet posters will recognize as very Houlian:
Don't draw diagrams
I can show you easier than write it down
Open your mind
Call me
The balls rotate
I've become Hal Houle...
I'm at the BCAPL Nationals, and I saw a fellow AZer and started talking about CTE. When one of them started to talk about discrete aiming and geometry, I put my hand up to stop him and said that the moment you start talking about geometry, you've missed the concept and nothing I say further will make any sense. I can't do that (hand up) in a post. That's why Hal asked to call... so he could stop you before you dug yourself into a trench that didn't allow you to listen. It happens to everyone, including me. Hal told me to stop before I got into that trench. And I listened. And I heard.
I shared this with a friend, and he wanted to draw diagrams. But he said he understood the concept, so I gave him the okay. He drew in 3D the theory of rotating spheres. He got it. So he will be my first student that I will really show the aiming systems that Hal Houle shared with me.
Writing retorts won't happen here. We've done that. If you see me at an event, and you're willing to keep that open mind, willing to not say things like discrete or geometry, then I'm willing to show you (how Hal Houle-ish of me,). If you just want to disprove these things, don't bother. You're perfectly fine aiming your way.
I told Hal 15 years ago that I wouldn't teach any of his systems until I was ready. I'm ready, Hal.
Freddie <~~~ the box is open
I talked with Hal a few times. He even called me a couple of times, which is something that makes me feel really honored. This was an aging man who took the effort to call me to share something. He'd always put his phone number out there to call him, but a call form him to me? Yeah, it's special.
I started with the Small Ball, and after a few hours of it, I discovered why he would say that the relationship from the cueball to the object would change and rotate (revolve might be more correct). When I called him, and told him that I finally understood what he was saying,he gave me permission to talk about his system. At that time, he said I was the first. I don't know if he was being wholly honest, and maybe he was talking about internet posters.
Hal's biggest weakness was his inability to explain what he was talking about. His concern was that several people were talking/teaching his systems, and that they didn't quite understand what Hal was saying. He only told people that they could teach his system once he (Hal) was sure that they really got the rotating ball-to-ball relationship is that concept.
Once he was convinced I got it (and there were some trigger words I used that he was waiting for me to say), he gave me the second secret, which I didn't see him ever write on any post: you can add more reference points. That is, there are more than three angles or two references.
Yes, you can add more reference points, but if you didn't get the concept of rotating spheres, he'd never tell you this. But before you get all gloaty, if you come up with more than five, you're not doing his system. There's no infinite number of reference points in his systems. There's a point of diminishing returns if you try to keep adding reference points.
I decided to write this post because in recent months, I've been explaining some Houle concepts, but I found myself saying several things, which old internet posters will recognize as very Houlian:
Don't draw diagrams
I can show you easier than write it down
Open your mind
Call me
The balls rotate
I've become Hal Houle...
I'm at the BCAPL Nationals, and I saw a fellow AZer and started talking about CTE. When one of them started to talk about discrete aiming and geometry, I put my hand up to stop him and said that the moment you start talking about geometry, you've missed the concept and nothing I say further will make any sense. I can't do that (hand up) in a post. That's why Hal asked to call... so he could stop you before you dug yourself into a trench that didn't allow you to listen. It happens to everyone, including me. Hal told me to stop before I got into that trench. And I listened. And I heard.
I shared this with a friend, and he wanted to draw diagrams. But he said he understood the concept, so I gave him the okay. He drew in 3D the theory of rotating spheres. He got it. So he will be my first student that I will really show the aiming systems that Hal Houle shared with me.
Writing retorts won't happen here. We've done that. If you see me at an event, and you're willing to keep that open mind, willing to not say things like discrete or geometry, then I'm willing to show you (how Hal Houle-ish of me,). If you just want to disprove these things, don't bother. You're perfectly fine aiming your way.
I told Hal 15 years ago that I wouldn't teach any of his systems until I was ready. I'm ready, Hal.
Freddie <~~~ the box is open
Last edited:
