south africa has to many elephants
The only thing that will slow the poaching of elephants is when less ivory is needed. The smaller the market for ivory, the less elephants it takes to meet that need. It is simple supply and demand. What will make the ivory market smaller where less ivory is needed? A number of things can do it. High prices. The possibility of expensive legal fees for buying or selling. The possibility of large fines for buying and selling. The possibility of going to jail for buying or selling.
So how does pumping tons of ivory into the market, such as these government stockpiles, help to make the market smaller (which we know is the only thing that will save the elephant)? It doesn't. It won't in any way make the ivory market smaller. In fact if anything it really only makes the market larger, exposing even more people to it and thereby creating even more people that want it. It damn sure doesn't make it smaller though.
But doesn't pumping all this supply into the market take care of the demand so that the demand is now met and no more elephants have to be killed? Nope. There is not a finite demand on ivory, meaning that there isn't only a certain amount of ivory that is needed and then no more. The demand for ivory is near limitless. Demand for ivory can only be meaningfully lowered by the cost going up, or the threat of prison sentence for buying or selling it, etc.
But for the sake of argument lets say that these stockpiles would take care of the demand for a while, even though they wouldn't. How long do you think that would last for? That ivory would just be used up relatively quickly and it wouldn't be long before you were right back in the exact same boat again with all the elephants being killed to meet the demand. Nothing has changed because you didn't do anything to make the market smaller.
The only way to save the elephant is lessen the demand for ivory, to make the ivory market need very small. And the only way to make the ivory market need very small is to make ivory as unappealing as possible to as many people as possible. And the way to make ivory unappealing to the most people is to make buying or selling it illegal with serious consequences etc.
Well John since you referenced guitars.. you can still go buy a guitar with BR in it, just like you can a cue. New BR is out of the question, in a similar story to ivory, you can't tell new stuff from old stuff. But the law does not make it illegal to own a 1945 Gibson Acoustic with a BR fretboard.
JV
Pool expects the world to give it a pass; the world won't.
You've brought this upon yourselves and now the price will be paid.
The audacity that demands ivory to play a game has irreversibly damaged pool's image.
Pool has chained itself to the demise of the elephant and it's demand for ivory persists.
It's not about 'legal' or 'illegal'. It's about the taking of a life to play a game.
The lawyers have been summoned and doomed defenses are being mounted.
Find the best you can because ultimately you'll be making your case before GOD.
Pool is just a game; life is not. Me thinks priorities have been confused.
I'll bite. Can you show me where john coloccia said he was opposed to the killing of animals, or to the use of animal parts either one? I sure can't find it anywhere.
Pool expects the world to give it a pass; the world won't.
You've brought this upon yourselves and now the price will be paid.
The audacity that demands ivory to play a game has irreversibly damaged pool's image.
Pool has chained itself to the demise of the elephant and it's demand for ivory persists.
It's not about 'legal' or 'illegal'. It's about the taking of a life to play a game.
The lawyers have been summoned and doomed defenses are being mounted.
Find the best you can because ultimately you'll be making your case before GOD.
Pool is just a game; life is not. Me thinks priorities have been confused.
So you must be completely vegan then, to avoid unnecessarily taking life? What do you do for a cue tip, leather is obviously out but I'm not aware of a good alternative for a playing tip, do share if you've found one.
There is a HUGE difference between leather falling off of cows/pigs/buffaloes... and Ivory falling off of Elephants for the never ending pleasure of Cueist. One is an endangered species the others aren't. Figure out which is which. Elephant burgers taste good.:boring:
I'm not for ivory necessarily, but if you argue that life is life and deserves to protected then you don't get to draw imaginary lines around only certain kinds of life.
Now, the argument that elephants are endangered and deserve a higher level of protection for that reason is another argument separate from the one I was addressing. It has merit.
My point is not that we need to allow ivory, but that arguing that it's immoral to kill an animal to play pool is a poor argument unless you truly follow that principle completely, and that includes leather.
My problem has little to do with either side of this debate and more to do with people trying to act morally superior when the chances that they truly follow the moral code they're preaching is highly unlikely.
This total BS FEEL GOOD legislation will do nothing to help Elephants any more than the Cap and Trade in California helped out GW.
This is the environmental movement cooking up more restrictions and regulations on investments that people made predicated on the use of legal ivory.
The biggest nemesis facing the African Elephants is the Africans themselves and California will be able to do next to nothing about this fact.
Africa has the highest birthrate in the world and as it modernizes the Elephants will diminish. Wild Elephants don't go together with farms and urban areas.
Its just like the GW hoax with China polluting off the hook. We have driven all the manufacturing off shore were there is no regulation or labor laws. The people in California could all commit suicide and it won't help GW and it won't help the Elephants.
People start thinking and quit being sheep.