Ivory ban

Fenwick

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
The only thing that will slow the poaching of elephants is when less ivory is needed. The smaller the market for ivory, the less elephants it takes to meet that need. It is simple supply and demand. What will make the ivory market smaller where less ivory is needed? A number of things can do it. High prices. The possibility of expensive legal fees for buying or selling. The possibility of large fines for buying and selling. The possibility of going to jail for buying or selling.

So how does pumping tons of ivory into the market, such as these government stockpiles, help to make the market smaller (which we know is the only thing that will save the elephant)? It doesn't. It won't in any way make the ivory market smaller. In fact if anything it really only makes the market larger, exposing even more people to it and thereby creating even more people that want it. It damn sure doesn't make it smaller though.

But doesn't pumping all this supply into the market take care of the demand so that the demand is now met and no more elephants have to be killed? Nope. There is not a finite demand on ivory, meaning that there isn't only a certain amount of ivory that is needed and then no more. The demand for ivory is near limitless. Demand for ivory can only be meaningfully lowered by the cost going up, or the threat of prison sentence for buying or selling it, etc.

But for the sake of argument lets say that these stockpiles would take care of the demand for a while, even though they wouldn't. How long do you think that would last for? That ivory would just be used up relatively quickly and it wouldn't be long before you were right back in the exact same boat again with all the elephants being killed to meet the demand. Nothing has changed because you didn't do anything to make the market smaller.

The only way to save the elephant is lessen the demand for ivory, to make the ivory market need very small. And the only way to make the ivory market need very small is to make ivory as unappealing as possible to as many people as possible. And the way to make ivory unappealing to the most people is to make buying or selling it illegal with serious consequences etc.

You make some very good points.
I'm all for the banning of ivory but I also think old world ivory should be grandfathered. I also think the elephant is already on the brink of extinction. It saddens me but I don't have a time machine. I myself don't play with a ivory cue. I also think the demand in China well never go away. They are the most people. Poaching well continue and burning ivory IMO is not the fix.

The lack of adult elephants due to poaching. See below.

PILANESBERG, South Africa — Some teenagers are raising hell in the untamed bush here, tormenting the wild animals and giving tourists a terrible fright.

Such rowdiness may sound typical for adolescents, except these delinquents are running amok in one of South Africa's most popular game reserves. They have killed rhinos. They have charged cars of safari-goers. And to make matters worse, they are elephant-sized--well, to be precise, they are elephants.

"There appears to be a discipline problem among the young elephant bulls," said Douw Grobler, veterinarian at Kruger National Park, where many of the elephants at Pilanesberg once lived. "There is a missing link in the elephant population at Pilanesberg. There is a need for the presence of adult elephant bulls. They act as the disciplinarians."

Pilanesberg National Park is Africa's biggest experiment in man-made nature, and like most things human, there was a margin of error when it was conceived nearly 30 years ago.
 

john coloccia

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Well John since you referenced guitars.. you can still go buy a guitar with BR in it, just like you can a cue. New BR is out of the question, in a similar story to ivory, you can't tell new stuff from old stuff. But the law does not make it illegal to own a 1945 Gibson Acoustic with a BR fretboard.

JV

That's right. It's not necessarily illegal to buy and sell it either. I'm not saying the California law is good, or even particularly enforceable...but it's just the beginning. Actually, I think New York has a similar ban. I think even China has recently said they plan on stopping the use of Ivory, and if I remember correctly they might use the most of anyone. What we're currently doing isn't working, so something else has to be done, and seeing some Asian countries step up is a step in the right direction.

Eventually, it will simply become so difficult and expensive that it will disappear except for collectors items and anachronistic oddities. But whatever...you can always count on California to over react and pass some screwy law, but that doesn't change the fact that it's on it's way out as a practical material.
 

Bavafongoul

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Well, actually the sale is made, according to IRS regulations, on the contract date.

The consummation of the sale is completed only when both parties receive quid pro quo.
It is governed by the terms and conditions set forth in the actual contract which may specify
that delivery is sometime in the future but the date of the contract is superior to arrival of
the goods. It should be the determining factor but the fact of the matter is the Courts will
decide.......read the lawsuit.......it is a logical sound argument that defends the property rights
of US citizens......in due time logic and common sense will prevail and in the meantime, the
elephant population will shrink and nothing good will come of this absurd new CA regulation.
 

KJ Cues

Pro Cue Builder & Repair
Silver Member
Pool expects the world to give it a pass; the world won't.
You've brought this upon yourselves and now the price will be paid.
The audacity that demands ivory to play a game has irreversibly damaged pool's image.
Pool has chained itself to the demise of the elephant and it's demand for ivory persists.
It's not about 'legal' or 'illegal'. It's about the taking of a life to play a game.
The lawyers have been summoned and doomed defenses are being mounted.
Find the best you can because ultimately you'll be making your case before GOD.
Pool is just a game; life is not. Me thinks priorities have been confused.
 

Tommy-D

World's best B player...
Silver Member
I usually don't participate in this conversation,but here goes.

I like animals,including elephants.

I don't hunt,but have no real problem with it. It's just not my thing since I'm not in a position to have to kill my own food to eat. Even if I did,I'm smart enough to know better than go messing with an animal that size.

I'm also a fan of ivory in cues,both for structural use like ferrules and joints,as well as inlays.

I see one having nothing to do with the other really,and here's why.

Has ANYONE ever went out and killed an elephant specifically to harvest whatever ivory is there,and used it immediately for that purpose?

My guess is NO,because fresh ivory is from what I understand worthless as far as material in cues and musical instruments.

It's my understanding that if ivory isn't at least 20 years old or more,is unusable.

So in my mind,I wasn't around to participate in the death of an elephant for what is in my cue and on my shafts,I have no idea exactly where it came from,it's age or any of that.

I bought my cue from a reputable dealer in 1990,and believe the materials used were legit.

I accept that and move on.

Just like I have to accept that I can't do anything about the ban,and accept and discover new ferrule materials,etc. Tommy D.
 

dom_poppa

Banned
Pool expects the world to give it a pass; the world won't.
You've brought this upon yourselves and now the price will be paid.
The audacity that demands ivory to play a game has irreversibly damaged pool's image.
Pool has chained itself to the demise of the elephant and it's demand for ivory persists.
It's not about 'legal' or 'illegal'. It's about the taking of a life to play a game.
The lawyers have been summoned and doomed defenses are being mounted.
Find the best you can because ultimately you'll be making your case before GOD.
Pool is just a game; life is not. Me thinks priorities have been confused.

I think it's time to go away from ivory but at the same time I believe you are exaggerating. The pool industry is just a small portion of the market that contributes to the 'deaths of elephants'.

While the pool industry does use ivory but that is a small portion compared to other industries. One ivory piano key can probably make many elaborate pool cues that contain ivory unless you are Ginacue. Anyways, the point is the pool industry does not contribute to that many elephants dying.

At least we can agree its time for this practice to go away from all industries.

In regards to ivories functionality...I don't get it...it's pretty but I had an ebony/ivory cue and the ivory sleeve cracked like many. Since it's a sleeve then it makes me believe it was put on for decorative reasons.
 
Last edited:

Maxx

AzB Platinum Member
Gold Member
Silver Member
I'll bite. Can you show me where john coloccia said he was opposed to the killing of animals, or to the use of animal parts either one? I sure can't find it anywhere.

Sorry but you missed my point. I wasn't trying to go after John. He mentioned cow bone as a replacement in guitars. Others have mentioned the leather tips being used. To some using any animal parts to support a game is reprehensible.

To me a pork shoulder that's been in my smoker for 12 hours is a thing of beauty. My daughter, a vegetarian, is disgusted. I tell her not to preach and to accept that not everyone feels as she does.

When I choose to shoot with a cue with, as far as I know, legal ivory I don't need to be criticized. If the government passes a law making something that I purchased legally suddenly illegal to sell I am going to be upset.

Life is complicated.
 

slide13

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Pool expects the world to give it a pass; the world won't.
You've brought this upon yourselves and now the price will be paid.
The audacity that demands ivory to play a game has irreversibly damaged pool's image.
Pool has chained itself to the demise of the elephant and it's demand for ivory persists.
It's not about 'legal' or 'illegal'. It's about the taking of a life to play a game.
The lawyers have been summoned and doomed defenses are being mounted.
Find the best you can because ultimately you'll be making your case before GOD.
Pool is just a game; life is not. Me thinks priorities have been confused.

So you must be completely vegan then, to avoid unnecessarily taking life? What do you do for a cue tip, leather is obviously out but I'm not aware of a good alternative for a playing tip, do share if you've found one.
 

Pangit

Banned
So you must be completely vegan then, to avoid unnecessarily taking life? What do you do for a cue tip, leather is obviously out but I'm not aware of a good alternative for a playing tip, do share if you've found one.

There is a HUGE difference between leather falling off of cows/pigs/buffaloes... and Ivory falling off of Elephants for the never ending pleasure of Cueist. One is an endangered species the others aren't. Figure out which is which. Elephant burgers taste good.
:boring:
 

mortuarymike-nv

mortuarymike-nv
Silver Member
Ivory laws

Blame it on the companies and the people who have been abusing the 1988 Ivory act.

They are the jerks who are ruined it for the rest of us.......
 

slide13

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member

There is a HUGE difference between leather falling off of cows/pigs/buffaloes... and Ivory falling off of Elephants for the never ending pleasure of Cueist. One is an endangered species the others aren't. Figure out which is which. Elephant burgers taste good.
:boring:

I'm not for ivory necessarily, but if you argue that life is life and deserves to protected then you don't get to draw imaginary lines around only certain kinds of life.

Now, the argument that elephants are endangered and deserve a higher level of protection for that reason is another argument separate from the one I was addressing. It has merit.

My point is not that we need to allow ivory, but that arguing that it's immoral to kill an animal to play pool is a poor argument unless you truly follow that principle completely, and that includes leather.

My problem has little to do with either side of this debate and more to do with people trying to act morally superior when the chances that they truly follow the moral code they're preaching is highly unlikely.
 

Pangit

Banned
I'm not for ivory necessarily, but if you argue that life is life and deserves to protected then you don't get to draw imaginary lines around only certain kinds of life.

Now, the argument that elephants are endangered and deserve a higher level of protection for that reason is another argument separate from the one I was addressing. It has merit.

My point is not that we need to allow ivory, but that arguing that it's immoral to kill an animal to play pool is a poor argument unless you truly follow that principle completely, and that includes leather.

My problem has little to do with either side of this debate and more to do with people trying to act morally superior when the chances that they truly follow the moral code they're preaching is highly unlikely.

Fair enough...lets make a leather cue tip out slide13's skin.:thumbup:
 

rhinobywilhite

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
This total BS FEEL GOOD legislation will do nothing to help Elephants any more than the Cap and Trade in California helped out GW.

This is the environmental movement cooking up more restrictions and regulations on investments that people made predicated on the use of legal ivory.

The biggest nemesis facing the African Elephants is the Africans themselves and California will be able to do next to nothing about this fact.

Africa has the highest birthrate in the world and as it modernizes the Elephants will diminish. Wild Elephants don't go together with farms and urban areas.

Its just like the GW hoax with China polluting off the hook. We have driven all the manufacturing off shore were there is no regulation or labor laws. The people in California could all commit suicide and it won't help GW and it won't help the Elephants.

People start thinking and quit being sheep.

Wasting your breath with this crowd.
 

classiccues

Don't hashtag your broke friends
Silver Member
In the follow up article posted today....

"Critics of the burn worry the destruction of this stockpile will increase the price of ivory in the black market and encourage more poaching.

"That is an ignorant idea," renowned conservationist Richard Leakey told the crowd at the burn ceremony. "We did it before and prices went from $300 down to $5 within three months of that fire."

Two things... A- I don't believe the price of ivory has ever dropped like that, so I think his statement is total bullsh*t. B- I believe the last big burn in the late 80's was prior to China's economic boom, which has helped to create the larger market for the ivory. In a corrupt society where they can claim they will tighten laws, but that just means more palm greasing.

So in the end.. the poachers will be looking to replace these tusks with more tusks... and the story continues...

JV
 

Walkermine

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member

Attachments

  • ivory.jpg
    ivory.jpg
    68.8 KB · Views: 168

Walkermine

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
More pictures including rhino horns.
 

Attachments

  • ea3d3a4eeb6e8f15970f6a7067008b17.jpg
    ea3d3a4eeb6e8f15970f6a7067008b17.jpg
    60.4 KB · Views: 167
  • f1e444a3eb758f15970f6a7067004397.jpg
    f1e444a3eb758f15970f6a7067004397.jpg
    50.8 KB · Views: 170
Top