Go Back   AzBilliards.com > Main Category > Non Pool Related
Reload this Page Hannity interviews Assange....what's up with that?
Reply
Page 1 of 3 1 23
 
Share Thread Tools Rate Thread
Hannity interviews Assange....what's up with that?
Old
  (#1)
chefjeff
No sides, only players
chefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond repute
 
chefjeff's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 45,697
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
   
Hannity interviews Assange....what's up with that? - 01-04-2017, 08:50 AM

Having long ago given up on Hannity as a viable source of anything, I have to wonder what his angle is with this good interview of Julian Assange on Fox???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dg6gu3qY7rA

Maybe with what's her face leaving FOX, he smells something in the air and is afraid?

Anyway, Assange murders the current lie about "Russian hacking...". On a side note, every news crawl I've seen uses the term "Russian hacking..." as if it were a true thing. This is a neat mind-control trick. Perhaps Hannity's interview is for nefarious reasons?

Julian tells us some good stuff here, regardless.


Jeff Livingston
  
Reply With Quote

Old
  (#2)
WGDave
AzB Silver Member
WGDave has a reputation beyond reputeWGDave has a reputation beyond reputeWGDave has a reputation beyond reputeWGDave has a reputation beyond reputeWGDave has a reputation beyond reputeWGDave has a reputation beyond reputeWGDave has a reputation beyond reputeWGDave has a reputation beyond reputeWGDave has a reputation beyond reputeWGDave has a reputation beyond reputeWGDave has a reputation beyond repute
 
WGDave's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 2,232
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: San Jose, CA
   
01-04-2017, 10:10 AM

Hannity has been interviewing Assange for months.

My favorite revelation from yesterdays interview?

Podesta's password for his email account....................."password"

What an idiot; the perfect choice to run Clinton's campaign.




In order to continue advancing their illogical arguments modern liberals have to pretend not to know things…
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
memikey
Never Has Been
memikey has a reputation beyond reputememikey has a reputation beyond reputememikey has a reputation beyond reputememikey has a reputation beyond reputememikey has a reputation beyond reputememikey has a reputation beyond reputememikey has a reputation beyond reputememikey has a reputation beyond reputememikey has a reputation beyond reputememikey has a reputation beyond reputememikey has a reputation beyond repute
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 18,569
vCash: 1700
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: I'm lost.
   
01-04-2017, 10:28 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by chefjeff View Post
Having long ago given up on Hannity as a viable source of anything, I have to wonder what his angle is with this good interview of Julian Assange on Fox???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dg6gu3qY7rA

Maybe with what's her face leaving FOX, he smells something in the air and is afraid?

Anyway, Assange murders the current lie about "Russian hacking...". On a side note, every news crawl I've seen uses the term "Russian hacking..." as if it were a true thing. This is a neat mind-control trick. Perhaps Hannity's interview is for nefarious reasons?

Julian tells us some good stuff here, regardless.


Jeff Livingston
Jeff, with respect, you have no more idea whether the Russian hacking thing is a lie than you have whether Assange is lying......and neither has anyone else on here.

It isn't even a case of "one version or the other must be a lie". It could be a case of one version being true and the other a lie....but they could both be true (to some degree at least). There could have been both insider leaks and Russian hacks. They could even both be lies, though that seems unlikely

The public might have a slightly better idea what extent of lying is going (and by whom) after Friday when the intelligence Services are due to brief Trump on how they reached the conclusion about Russian hacking. They might even show him what exactly they hacked into. If Trump then starts to quietly go into reverse or does the opposite it might be a clue all in itself.

Sensible voices have been saying from the beginning of this drama....why not just wait and see some credible evidence from either the Intelligence Service or from Assange instead of prematurely digging yourselves into entrenched positions on what for any one on here is essentially nothing better than a personal hunch about who is telling the truth.

If things don't go the way that any particular member has chosen to dig himself into a trench on, they'll probably then dream up a conspiracy theory to explain why it seems to have gone that way. No-one already heavily entrenched one away or the other is ever going to just accept they were wrong....not on azb npr anyway. I even had a fanatic on here tell me a few weeks ago that it was far more likely that the Podesta e mails in particular were leaked by the DNC staffer who was murdered in the street than hacked by the Russians.....despite it being pointed out that many of those e mails were not sent or received until months after the staffer in question's death


Mike

Last edited by memikey; 01-04-2017 at 10:43 AM.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
overlord
AzB Silver Member
overlord has a reputation beyond reputeoverlord has a reputation beyond reputeoverlord has a reputation beyond reputeoverlord has a reputation beyond reputeoverlord has a reputation beyond reputeoverlord has a reputation beyond reputeoverlord has a reputation beyond reputeoverlord has a reputation beyond reputeoverlord has a reputation beyond reputeoverlord has a reputation beyond reputeoverlord has a reputation beyond repute
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 13,379
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Dec 2011
   
01-04-2017, 10:34 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by memikey View Post
Jeff, with respect, you have no more idea whether the Russian hacking thing is a lie than you have whether Assange is lying......and neither has anyone else on here.

It isn't even a case of "one version or the other must be a lie". It could be a case of one version being true and the other a lie....but they could both be true (to some degree at least) or even both be lies

The public might have a slightly better idea what extent of lying is going (and by whom) after Friday when the intelligence Services are due to brief Trump on how they reached the conclusion about Russian hacking. If Trump then starts to quietly go into reverse or does the opposite it will be a clue all in itself.

Sensible voices have been saying from the beginning of this drama....why not just wait and see some credible evidence from either the Intelligence Service or from Assange instead of prematurely digging yourselves into entrenched positions on what for any one on here is essentially nothing better than a personal hunch about who is telling the truth.

If things don't go the way that any particular member has chosen to dig himself into a trench on, they'll probably then dream up a conspiracy theory to explain why it seems to have gone that way. No-one already heavily entrenched one away or the other is ever going to just accept they were wrong....not on azb npr anyway
They have to find " threats " to keep the DOD budget above 600 billion a year. With all our vaunted " super power " status we have a really bad track record.

I know the the US has not been hacking away and meddling in others affairs all over the world.

The McMansion " Deep State " wants keep the fleecing going.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
chefjeff
No sides, only players
chefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond repute
 
chefjeff's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 45,697
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
   
01-04-2017, 10:35 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by memikey View Post
Jeff, with respect, you have no more idea whether the Russian hacking thing is a lie than you have whether Assange is lying......and neither has anyone else on here.

It isn't even a case of "one version or the other must be a lie". It could be a case of one version being true and the other a lie....but they could both be true (to some degree at least) or even both be lies

The public might have a slightly better idea what extent of lying is going (and by whom) after Friday when the intelligence Services are due to brief Trump on how they reached the conclusion about Russian hacking. If Trump then starts to quietly go into reverse or does the opposite it will be a clue all in itself.

Sensible voices have been saying from the beginning of this drama....why not just wait and see some credible evidence from either the Intelligence Service or from Assange instead of prematurely digging yourselves into entrenched positions on what for any one on here is essentially nothing better than a personal hunch about who is telling the truth.

If things don't go the way that any particular member has chosen to dig himself into a trench on, they'll probably then dream up a conspiracy theory to explain why it seems to have gone that way. No-one already heavily entrenched one away or the other is ever going to just accept they were wrong....not on azb npr anyway
One can judge fairly, but not perfectly!, by "who benefits" in order to have a good idea about who's lying and who isn't. Wikileaks has what to benefit from lying here? Otoh, the govt has many benefits from lying.

But you're right, no one can know for sure.

Thanks,


Jeff Livingston
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
PRED
AzB Silver Member
PRED has a reputation beyond reputePRED has a reputation beyond reputePRED has a reputation beyond reputePRED has a reputation beyond reputePRED has a reputation beyond reputePRED has a reputation beyond reputePRED has a reputation beyond reputePRED has a reputation beyond reputePRED has a reputation beyond reputePRED has a reputation beyond reputePRED has a reputation beyond repute
 
PRED's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 4,555
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Mar 2013
   
01-04-2017, 10:39 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by memikey View Post
blahblahblah
It's BS and you know it. Headline: Barriers erected at Christian celebration to prevent attacks by peace loving muslims.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
RCLane
Cue Buyer Of What I Like
RCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond repute
 
RCLane's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,154
vCash: 500
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Kansas
   
01-04-2017, 11:07 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by memikey View Post
Jeff, with respect, you have no more idea whether the Russian hacking thing is a lie than you have whether Assange is lying......and neither has anyone else on here.

It isn't even a case of "one version or the other must be a lie". It could be a case of one version being true and the other a lie....but they could both be true (to some degree at least). There could have been both insider leaks and Russian hacks. They could even both be lies, though that seems unlikely

The public might have a slightly better idea what extent of lying is going (and by whom) after Friday when the intelligence Services are due to brief Trump on how they reached the conclusion about Russian hacking. They might even show him what exactly they hacked into. If Trump then starts to quietly go into reverse or does the opposite it might be a clue all in itself.

Sensible voices have been saying from the beginning of this drama....why not just wait and see some credible evidence from either the Intelligence Service or from Assange instead of prematurely digging yourselves into entrenched positions on what for any one on here is essentially nothing better than a personal hunch about who is telling the truth.

If things don't go the way that any particular member has chosen to dig himself into a trench on, they'll probably then dream up a conspiracy theory to explain why it seems to have gone that way. No-one already heavily entrenched one away or the other is ever going to just accept they were wrong....not on azb npr anyway. I even had a fanatic on here tell me a few weeks ago that it was far more likely that the Podesta e mails in particular were leaked by the DNC staffer who was murdered in the street than hacked by the Russians.....despite it being pointed out that many of those e mails were not sent or received until months after the staffer in question's death
The CIA...LIES...SO THAT IS A CREDIBLE SOURCE..and why did Seth Rich get Killed. You know who did it. Exactly. The DNC said it was a Robbery. The parents said he had his watch; cellphone: wallet, cash, credit cards and car & house keys. So? Is it still a Robbery given the Dads testimony to the media about his Sons body being found with 2 gunshots too the back. Most attackers.!!!. Attack from the front. Revenege seekers attack from the back. Look into the Forensic Psyhcology of Murder and Robbery and Attacks.

○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
RCLANE○○○○○2 TIMOTHY 4:7
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
WGDave
AzB Silver Member
WGDave has a reputation beyond reputeWGDave has a reputation beyond reputeWGDave has a reputation beyond reputeWGDave has a reputation beyond reputeWGDave has a reputation beyond reputeWGDave has a reputation beyond reputeWGDave has a reputation beyond reputeWGDave has a reputation beyond reputeWGDave has a reputation beyond reputeWGDave has a reputation beyond reputeWGDave has a reputation beyond repute
 
WGDave's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 2,232
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: San Jose, CA
   
01-04-2017, 11:09 AM

Found this interesting October 27th article about the dating site toddandclare. Suspect the Clintons were behind its attempt to take down Assange and Wikileaks. As with everything that Hillary did during the election, it was an epic fail.


The strange tale of a dating site’s attacks on WikiLeaks founder Assange.


http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/poli...110904727.html




In order to continue advancing their illogical arguments modern liberals have to pretend not to know things…
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
RCLane
Cue Buyer Of What I Like
RCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond repute
 
RCLane's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,154
vCash: 500
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Kansas
   
01-04-2017, 11:10 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by overlord View Post
They have to find " threats " to keep the DOD budget above 600 billion a year. With all our vaunted " super power " status we have a really bad track record.

I know the the US has not been hacking away and meddling in others affairs all over the world.

The McMansion " Deep State " wants keep the fleecing going.
If the Russians Did do this. Do you think that our Intellegience would tell us if they could prove it. No, because information has power. Putin is said to be worth 750Million. Although, none of it is in his name. Huhn? How is that possible. Probably because he is an Expert in the ways of Deception. An being a former KGB intel Op

○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
RCLANE○○○○○2 TIMOTHY 4:7
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
RCLane
Cue Buyer Of What I Like
RCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond repute
 
RCLane's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,154
vCash: 500
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Kansas
   
01-04-2017, 11:11 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by WGDave View Post
Found this interesting October 27th article about the dating site toddandclare. Suspect the Clintons were behind its attempt to take down Assange and Wikileaks. As with everything that Hillary did during the election, it was an epic fail.


The strange tale of a dating site’s attacks on WikiLeaks founder Assange.


http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/poli...110904727.html
Exactly. To which is why he is hiding in Ecuador. For the past 4 yrs.

○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
RCLANE○○○○○2 TIMOTHY 4:7
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#11)
chefjeff
No sides, only players
chefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond repute
 
chefjeff's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 45,697
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
   
01-04-2017, 11:21 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by RCLane View Post
Exactly. To which is why he is hiding in Ecuador. For the past 4 yrs.

○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
RCLANE○○○○○2 TIMOTHY 4:7
He's in the UK in the Ecuador embassy, not Ecuador itself.

Jeff Livingston
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12)
strmanglr scott
AzB Silver Member
strmanglr scott has a reputation beyond reputestrmanglr scott has a reputation beyond reputestrmanglr scott has a reputation beyond reputestrmanglr scott has a reputation beyond reputestrmanglr scott has a reputation beyond reputestrmanglr scott has a reputation beyond reputestrmanglr scott has a reputation beyond reputestrmanglr scott has a reputation beyond reputestrmanglr scott has a reputation beyond reputestrmanglr scott has a reputation beyond reputestrmanglr scott has a reputation beyond repute
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 2,360
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Jul 2011
   
01-04-2017, 11:26 AM

Where is the NSA on this hacking garbage? They are the ones watching the internet to the tune of what, like 80 billion?

They track fn everything.

Maybe I'm wrong, but the last I heard from them...

https://youtu.be/Re72di5phM0
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#13)
RCLane
Cue Buyer Of What I Like
RCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond repute
 
RCLane's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,154
vCash: 500
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Kansas
   
01-04-2017, 11:27 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by chefjeff View Post
He's in the UK in the Ecuador embassy, not Ecuador itself.

Jeff Livingston
Okay. Didn't know that

○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
RCLANE○○○○○2 TIMOTHY 4:7
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#14)
RCLane
Cue Buyer Of What I Like
RCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond reputeRCLane has a reputation beyond repute
 
RCLane's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,154
vCash: 500
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Kansas
   
01-04-2017, 11:30 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by strmanglr scott View Post
Where is the NSA on this hacking garbage? They are the ones watching the internet to the tune of what, like 80 billion?

They track fn everything.

Maybe I'm wrong, but the last I heard from them...

https://youtu.be/Re72di5phM0
Too which is why I say. If they government tells you something. That is what they want you to believe. If you lie to the government it os a crime. If they lie....well, that's okay. Because, hey why should they obey the rules they create.

○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
RCLANE○○○○○2 TIMOTHY 4:7
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#15)
chefjeff
No sides, only players
chefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond reputechefjeff has a reputation beyond repute
 
chefjeff's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 45,697
vCash: 500
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
   
01-04-2017, 11:39 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by chefjeff View Post
He's in the UK in the Ecuador embassy, not Ecuador itself.

Jeff Livingston

Quote:
Originally Posted by RCLane View Post
Okay. Didn't know that

○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
RCLANE○○○○○2 TIMOTHY 4:7
In a strange twist of fate, Julian would probably be free to walk about if he was in Ecuador. The whole rape thing re Sweden has to be a set up, as the women involved are not pressing charges but the Swedish govt is? It is just a little too convenient to believe.

He's in a prison, basically. You can search for articles where the building was at times being invaded with military types, sounds in the stairwells, burglaries, and other strange occurrences. I'm surprised the see eye eh, et a, hasn't taken him out yet.

It takes a brave man to do what he's done. Someday, there'll be a statue of him.


Jeff Livingston
  
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 1 of 3 1 23

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.