Ultraskin review
So, I started with an Ultraskin Hard on a McDermott EK-1 (I'd been shooting with Wizard mediums and harder tips at the time) ... It's certainly a hard tip. Played nice but just wasn't what I was looking for.
Next I had an Ultraskin medium put on a Tiger ultra X LD shaft, better but still wasn't quite what I was looking for (just a touch hard).
Then picked up a Jack Madden cue (from 2006) with 2 shafts, both I think were Tiger Mediums and just couldn't get used to them (too hard, funny sounds). I shot for a month and still didn't feel I had the control I wanted. Time to experiment...
Installed a few weeks apart by the same repairman....
Shaft one, Kamui Black soft on a pad
Shaft two, Tom's Ultraskin soft on a pad (installed for free by my guy for me to test it out)
I've shot off and on with both for over a month and really feel like I can share something. Both have a reasonably similar hit/feel/sound. Honestly, if you didn't know which was which they are hard to tell apart, except for one (to me) important element.
The Kamui is 'springier'... not necessarily softer, but absorbs a bit more energy than the ultraskin. I can flip back and forth and on most shots not really tell a difference.
However, there is one significant difference (and not just the cost :smile The easiest way for me to say it is this, for draw and center ball very little change. However on follow shots, there is a significant difference. Particularly on force follow I feel like the ultraskin will let me move the cue ball. While with the Kamui, it feels like it is absorbing enough of the energy that I have a real tough time utilizing follow as well as I need to (and for YEARS people would say I played with a ton of follow and very little draw).
So there you have it... I can play with either, but for my money, can play a more complete game with the ultraskin...
My $0.02 and YMMV
-Joe
So, I started with an Ultraskin Hard on a McDermott EK-1 (I'd been shooting with Wizard mediums and harder tips at the time) ... It's certainly a hard tip. Played nice but just wasn't what I was looking for.
Next I had an Ultraskin medium put on a Tiger ultra X LD shaft, better but still wasn't quite what I was looking for (just a touch hard).
Then picked up a Jack Madden cue (from 2006) with 2 shafts, both I think were Tiger Mediums and just couldn't get used to them (too hard, funny sounds). I shot for a month and still didn't feel I had the control I wanted. Time to experiment...
Installed a few weeks apart by the same repairman....
Shaft one, Kamui Black soft on a pad
Shaft two, Tom's Ultraskin soft on a pad (installed for free by my guy for me to test it out)
I've shot off and on with both for over a month and really feel like I can share something. Both have a reasonably similar hit/feel/sound. Honestly, if you didn't know which was which they are hard to tell apart, except for one (to me) important element.
The Kamui is 'springier'... not necessarily softer, but absorbs a bit more energy than the ultraskin. I can flip back and forth and on most shots not really tell a difference.
However, there is one significant difference (and not just the cost :smile The easiest way for me to say it is this, for draw and center ball very little change. However on follow shots, there is a significant difference. Particularly on force follow I feel like the ultraskin will let me move the cue ball. While with the Kamui, it feels like it is absorbing enough of the energy that I have a real tough time utilizing follow as well as I need to (and for YEARS people would say I played with a ton of follow and very little draw).
So there you have it... I can play with either, but for my money, can play a more complete game with the ultraskin...
My $0.02 and YMMV
-Joe