So I was looking for a particular cue makers cue, and I was offered one of his cues. It is quite pretty actually.
What's interesting is the the forearm and butt piece were taken from 2 separate Dufferin cues. They were both cored and then I assume the cue was assembled as normal by the cuemaker.
I would assume this was done to keep costs down, while focusing on playability.
Questions I would appreciate some feedback on:
1. My assumption is that since it is cored, that the cue would likely play very much like it would if he had made the forearm from scratch? Is this true?
2. Any reason to avoid a Dufferin conversion?
I have only seen one that I know of, it was a Treadway, but I would have had no idea it was a conversion in this case unless I was told. I know Brunswick and Titlist conversions are popular and this seems close to that in practicality.
Any feedback would be appreciated.
Thanks!
What's interesting is the the forearm and butt piece were taken from 2 separate Dufferin cues. They were both cored and then I assume the cue was assembled as normal by the cuemaker.
I would assume this was done to keep costs down, while focusing on playability.
Questions I would appreciate some feedback on:
1. My assumption is that since it is cored, that the cue would likely play very much like it would if he had made the forearm from scratch? Is this true?
2. Any reason to avoid a Dufferin conversion?
I have only seen one that I know of, it was a Treadway, but I would have had no idea it was a conversion in this case unless I was told. I know Brunswick and Titlist conversions are popular and this seems close to that in practicality.
Any feedback would be appreciated.
Thanks!