Break Stats -- Derby City 10-Foot (Bigfoot) 10-Ball, Jan. 2018

AtLarge

AzB Gold Member
Gold Member
Silver Member
Here are some break statistics from the 2018 Derby City Classic's Diamond Bigfoot 10-Ball Challenge played January 19-22, 2018 at the Horseshoe Southern Indiana in Elizabeth, Indiana with pay-per-view streaming by Accu-Stats. This was an invitational 16-man, single-elimination event won by Roberto Gomez.

Conditions -- The conditions for this event included:
- Diamond 10-foot table with standard pro-cut pockets (4½" corners) and Simonis 860 cloth;​
- Cyclop TV balls with the red-spot cue ball;​
- Accu-Rack Pro10 racking template;​
- rack your own (1-ball on the spot, 2-ball and 3-ball on the back corners) and alternate breaks from anywhere behind the head string;​
- jump cues not allowed and jumping with break cues not allowed;​
- foul on all balls;​
- all slop counts (except spot any 10-ball made on the break); and​
- 40-second shot clock with one automatic extension per player per rack.​

The event's 15 matches (283 games), all of which were streamed from the same table, were as follows. The figures in parentheses are the Accu-Stats Total Performance Averages (TPA), as calculated by Accu-Stats and shown on the stream:


Fri., Jan. 19 (Round 1)
Roberto Gomez (.904) defeated Ronnie Alcano (.882) 11-10​
Joshua Filler (.879) d. Jayson Shaw (.819) 11-7​
Mika Immonen (.900) d. Dennis Orcollo (.831) 11-7​
Shane Van Boening (.845) d. Dennis Hatch (.830) 11-10​
Sat., Jan. 20 (Round 1, continued)
Jeffrey De Luna (.896) d. Konrad Juszczyszyn (.833) 11-7​
Fedor Gorst (.900) d. Alex Pagulayan (.897) 11-7​
John Morra (.892) d. Lee Vann Corteza (.828) 11-8​
Ruslan Chinakhov (.817) d. Corey Deuel (.863) 11-10​
Sun., Jan. 21 (Round 2)
Gomez (.845) d. Filler (.782) 11-6​
Immonen (.846) d. Van Boening (.881) 11-9​
Gorst (.886) d. De Luna (.719) 11-4​
Morra (.867) d. Chinakhov (.843) 11-8​
Mon., Jan. 22 (Rounds 3 and 4 -- semifinals and finals)
Gomez (.893) d. Immonen (.931 -- best of the event) 11-10​
Gorst (.883) d. Morra (.773) 11-5​
Gomez (.799) d. Gorst (.788) 11-10​

Overall results -- The breaker made at least one ball (and did not foul) 62% of the time (176 of 283), won 51% of the games (145 of 283), and broke and ran 21% of the games (60 of 283).

Here's a more detailed breakdown of the 283 games.

Breaker made at least one ball and did not foul:​
Breaker won the game: 109 (39% of the 283 games)​
Breaker lost the game: 67 (24%)​
Breaker fouled on the break:​
Breaker won the game: 6 (2%)​
Breaker lost the game: 17 (6%)​
Breaker broke dry (without fouling):​
Breaker won the game: 30 (11%)​
Breaker lost the game: 54 (19%)​
Therefore, whereas the breaker won 51% (145 of 283) of all games,​
He won 62% (109 of 176) of the games in which he made at least one ball on the break and did not foul.​
He won 26% (6 of 23) of the games in which he fouled on the break.​
He won 36% (30 of 84) of the games in which he broke dry but did not foul.​
He won 34% (36 of 107) of the games in which he either fouled on the break or broke dry without fouling.​

Break-and-run games -- The 60 break-and-run games represented 21% of all 283 games, 41% of the 145 games won by the breaker, and 34% of the 176 games in which the break was successful (made a ball and didn't foul).

With alternating breaks, B&R "packages" of the normal type are not possible. But we can still look at the breaks of a given player and see how many he ran on his own successive breaks, and we can call these "alternate-break packages." The 60 break-and-run games consisted of 1 alternate-break 4-pack (by Immonen), 5 alternate-break 2-packs, and 46 singles.

10-balls on the break -- The 10-ball was made on the break 4 times (1.4% of the 283 breaks), but it was immediately spotted (with the breaker continuing to shoot) rather than counting as a win.
 
Last edited:

AtLarge

AzB Gold Member
Gold Member
Silver Member
Miscellany from the data for the 2018 Bigfoot 10-Ball Challenge:

• The most balls made on a single break was 4, done just once -- by Gorst. He ran out from that break.

• The average number of balls made on the break was 1.0 (this includes dry and fouled breaks). On successful breaks (made at least one ball and did not foul), the average was 1.4.

• 43% (123 of 283) of the games ended in one inning – 21% (60) won by the breaker (B&R) and 22% (63) won by the non-breaker. 14% (41 of 283) of the games lasted 4 or more innings. The longest game went 12 innings (24 visits).

• 33% (94 of 283) of the games were run out by the player who was at the table following the break. These run-outs were:
- By the breaker after successful breaks (B&R games) – 34% (60 of 176)​
- By the non-breaker after fouls on the break – 57% (13 of 23)​
- By the non-breaker after dry breaks – 25% (21 of 84)​

• The player who made the first ball after the break:
- Won the game in that same inning 49% of the time (140 of 283)​
- Won the game in a later inning 20% of the time (57 of 283)​
- Lost the game 30% of the time (86 of 283)​

• The match loser won an average of 7.9 games in these races to 11. Five matches went to hill/hill; the fewest games won in a match was 4 (once), and the next fewest was 5 (once).

• The longest match in elapsed time, at 161 minutes, was the finals -- Gomez d. Gorst 11-10. The shortest match in elapsed time, at 90 minutes, was Filler d. Shaw 11-7. The elapsed time was measured from the lag until the winning ball was made (or conceded), so it includes time for racking and timeouts. These two matches were also the ones that were highest and lowest in average minutes per game, at 7.7 and 5.0.

• The average elapsed time for these 15 races to 11 was 118 minutes, averaging 6.3 minutes per game.

• Breaking fouls averaged 1 for every 12.3 games, other fouls 1 for every 4.5 games, and missed shots about 1 for every 1.6 games.

• About 40% of the games involved one or more safeties.
 
Last edited:

pt109

WO double hemlock
Silver Member
I’m sold on playing rotation games on 5x10s....with 4.5 inch pockets.
It was a great tournament to watch.

What I’m not sold on is alternate break.
If some player gets way behind...like, say 9-3....he can’t win without the cooperation of
his opponent....I think the possibility of a ‘pack’ should always be there.

Thanx for the stats, sir
 

King T

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Your right

I’m sold on playing rotation games on 5x10s....with 4.5 inch pockets.
It was a great tournament to watch.

What I’m not sold on is alternate break.
If some player gets way behind...like, say 9-3....he can’t win without the cooperation of
his opponent....I think the possibility of a ‘pack’ should always be there.

Thanx for the stats, sir

I agree. I think that alternate break on a Bar Box or 8footer is cool, but on a 10footer.,
Let the best man win and if he can run out on that monster so be it!
 

StraightPoolIU

Brent
Silver Member
I agree. I think that alternate break on a Bar Box or 8footer is cool, but on a 10footer.,
Let the best man win and if he can run out on that monster so be it!

I agree with this. I was really surprised they changed it to alternate break. Watching Jayson Shaw run packages on that monster table last year was some of the most impressive pool I've ever seen.
 

GB Basher

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
I prefer alternate break.
While I agree coming back from a 9-3 deficit requires help from your opponent, it required the equal amount of help the other way to get a 9-3 lead in the first place.
 

AtLarge

AzB Gold Member
Gold Member
Silver Member
Even though the numbers are small, here are the break-and-run results for each player.

Alcano (1 match) -- 3 B&R out of 11 breaks = 27%
Shaw (1 match) -- 0 of 9 = 0%
Orcollo (1 match) -- 1 of 9 = 11%
Hatch (1 match) -- 2 of 11 = 18%
Juszczyszyn (1 match) -- 1 of 9 = 11%
Pagulayan (1 match) -- 1 of 9 = 11%
Corteza (1 match) -- 0 of 10 = 0%
Deuel (1 match) -- 1 of 10 = 10%

Filler (2 matches) -- 4 of 17 = 24%
Van Boening (2 matches) -- 4 of 20 = 20%
De Luna (2 matches) -- 4 of 17 = 24%
Chinakhov (2 matches) -- 3 of 20 = 15%

Immonen (3 matches) -- 10 of 29 = 34%
Morra (3 matches) -- 5 of 27 = 19%

Gorst (4 matches) -- 7 of 34 = 21%
Gomez (4 matches) -- 14 of 41 = 34%

Total -- 60 of 283 = 21%

As mentioned in post #1, the 60 break-and-run games consisted of 1 alternate-break 4-pack (Immonen), 5 alternate-break 2-packs, and 46 singles.
 

AtLarge

AzB Gold Member
Gold Member
Silver Member
Mean of Accu-Stats match TPA's:

• for the 15 match winners -- .870 (2017 = .869, 2016 = .878)

• for the 15 match losers -- .833 (2017 = .795, 2016 = .822)

• Total (all 30 TPA's) -- ..852 (2017 = .832, 2016 = .850)

[These mean values are likely to be a little different from aggregate TPA's calculated for each of these 3 groups.]
 

AtLarge

AzB Gold Member
Gold Member
Silver Member
B&R percentages on successful breaks, by number of balls made on the break, for 2015-2018 Bigfoot events, combined (excluding one match I did not watch in 2015):

Made 1 ball on break, -- ran out 31% of the time (126 of 408)
2 balls -- 34% (53 of 158)
3 balls -- 38% (24 of 63)
4 or 5 balls -- 82% (9 of 11)

On all successful breaks -- 33% (212 of 640)
 

Cameron Smith

is kind of hungry...
Silver Member
I’m sold on playing rotation games on 5x10s....with 4.5 inch pockets.
It was a great tournament to watch.

What I’m not sold on is alternate break.
If some player gets way behind...like, say 9-3....he can’t win without the cooperation of
his opponent....I think the possibility of a ‘pack’ should always be there.

Thanx for the stats, sir

Particularly on 10 foot table. I'd be curious what the thought process was when it was changed. I know Jayson had that dominating match that included his 6 pack, but his opponent did get some chances and never really fired back at him.
 

AtLarge

AzB Gold Member
Gold Member
Silver Member
The semifinal match between Gomez (winner 11-10) and Immonen was terrific.

It had 11 B&R games. The most in any other match was 6, and the average in the other 14 matches was 3½.

Immonen produced an alternate-break 4-pack; no one else broke and ran more than twice in a row.

Immonen trailed by 5 games at 8-3 then won 7 of the next 8 games to get to the hill first.

The total of the 2 players' Accu-Stats TPAs was 1.824. I looked back at the TPAs for all the Bigfoot matches from 2014 forward, and this was the only match where the total of the TPAs was 1.800 or higher. The previous top match in this regard was 1.798 for Shaw d. Morra in 2016.
 
Last edited:
Top