Say for the tighter pockets, only me to blame for my issues there
I have always struggled to play well with the higher end aramith sets, tournaments, centennials,etc
And diamond tables
Now that I've been playing on Brunswick medalists,the newer ones, and the old premiere set I just have a better feel of that combo and can move the cue ball around much easier
The diamond I played on at bogies has simonis but very well used, and the Brunswick at slick Willie's has championship cloth with way more tears in the cloth, doesn't seem to be stretched as tight either
Does it matter to any of you which set or table you play on?
Certainly better players than me shouldn't have much issue,
The aramith TV set just feels incredibly more dense than the old aramith set, especially played on the diamond, could the slate be that much thicker?
Mayb my cue plays a part in this as well
I have always struggled to play well with the higher end aramith sets, tournaments, centennials,etc
And diamond tables
Now that I've been playing on Brunswick medalists,the newer ones, and the old premiere set I just have a better feel of that combo and can move the cue ball around much easier
The diamond I played on at bogies has simonis but very well used, and the Brunswick at slick Willie's has championship cloth with way more tears in the cloth, doesn't seem to be stretched as tight either
Does it matter to any of you which set or table you play on?
Certainly better players than me shouldn't have much issue,
The aramith TV set just feels incredibly more dense than the old aramith set, especially played on the diamond, could the slate be that much thicker?
Mayb my cue plays a part in this as well