This question is actually for manual pivot and pro1 sweep CTE users.
After getting your visuals and then focusing on the CB, you have a CCB view, which I believe is called a "fixed" CB. Have you ever looked straight through that CCB to see where the CB would hit the OB from there, prior to any pivot or sweep?
I ask because when I pay attention to this while doing a 15° perception on two different shots (each shot having about 2ft between CB and OB) my perceived CCB is very consistent, meaning my tip is pointed through CCB and directed to the same place on the OB for each shot, regardless of where the balls are positioned on the table. Then , of course, depending on inside or outside pivot, my final CCB solution is either thicker or thinner than that initial perception.
If you don't get the same CCB point of view from using the same visuals on two shots where the distance between CB and OB is the same, and the distance between the CB and your eyes/head is the same, what exactly are you doing to produce two different shot perspectives?
I was going to just wait on Stan's book to see if this is addressed, but figured it wouldn't be in the book.
After getting your visuals and then focusing on the CB, you have a CCB view, which I believe is called a "fixed" CB. Have you ever looked straight through that CCB to see where the CB would hit the OB from there, prior to any pivot or sweep?
I ask because when I pay attention to this while doing a 15° perception on two different shots (each shot having about 2ft between CB and OB) my perceived CCB is very consistent, meaning my tip is pointed through CCB and directed to the same place on the OB for each shot, regardless of where the balls are positioned on the table. Then , of course, depending on inside or outside pivot, my final CCB solution is either thicker or thinner than that initial perception.
If you don't get the same CCB point of view from using the same visuals on two shots where the distance between CB and OB is the same, and the distance between the CB and your eyes/head is the same, what exactly are you doing to produce two different shot perspectives?
I was going to just wait on Stan's book to see if this is addressed, but figured it wouldn't be in the book.
Last edited: