ronhudson said:Of the components that make up a cue, particularly the joint, how much does the screw affect the feel of the cue as a whole?
If you had the several of the same cue with each one having a different screw, how many people would be able to identify which was which or even if there was any difference?
ronhudson said:Of the components that make up a cue, particularly the joint, how much does the screw affect the feel of the cue as a whole?
If you had the several of the same cue with each one having a different screw, how many people would be able to identify which was which or even if there was any difference?
ronhudson said:Of the components that make up a cue, particularly the joint, how much does the screw affect the feel of the cue as a whole?
If you had the several of the same cue with each one having a different screw, how many people would be able to identify which was which or even if there was any difference?
Great post. I'd have to say that you might be able to tell a 5/16x18 pin from a 3/8x10, but even that is subject to discussion. Most important part of pin is weight and its impact on balance point. Instead of worrying about pin, the diameter of the joint and the shaft taper should be the subjects. Royce told me at the APA finals that once you thread the shaft on, loose or tight, they all do the same. Sounds reasonable.matta said:Royce from OB-1 told me about an experiment he did. I'm not certain on the exact details but it went something like this.... (Maybe Royce will read this and elaborate)
He built 4 cues EXACTLY alike except different joints. 5/16x14, 3/8x10, radial, etc...
He then taped over the joints and took them to the local pool halls in Dallas, TX. Dallas has a huge pool scene with a ton of top notch players. He passed the cues around asked people to try to guess the joint type.
According to Royce, they couldn't even pick out the cue with the same joint as their personal cue. No one could tell the difference.
If you believe this experiment, it shows that the joint pin has little to do with how a cue plays.
There aren't a ton of people doing "scientific" experiments about cues. Personally, I liked this one.
my $.02,
I like this experiment and I agree that the average player can't tell the difference. I think maybe on certain cues that a player may notice a difference, but on the average I doubt that most people could tell the difference. I can't tell the difference on my cues and I have cues with 5/16x14 SS joints and one with a radial wood to wood joint and they hit the same to me (I use predator shafts on the cues).matta said:Royce from OB-1 told me about an experiment he did. I'm not certain on the exact details but it went something like this.... (Maybe Royce will read this and elaborate)
He built 4 cues EXACTLY alike except different joints. 5/16x14, 3/8x10, radial, etc...
He then taped over the joints and took them to the local pool halls in Dallas, TX. Dallas has a huge pool scene with a ton of top notch players. He passed the cues around asked people to try to guess the joint type.
According to Royce, they couldn't even pick out the cue with the same joint as their personal cue. No one could tell the difference.
If you believe this experiment, it shows that the joint pin has little to do with how a cue plays.
There aren't a ton of people doing "scientific" experiments about cues. Personally, I liked this one.
my $.02,
Imo with Pred and OB1 shafts, the pins do not matter.SCCues said:I like this experiment and I agree that the average player can't tell the difference. I think maybe on certain cues that a player may notice a difference, but on the average I doubt that most people could tell the difference. I can't tell the difference on my cues and I have cues with 5/16x14 SS joints and one with a radial wood to wood joint and they hit the same to me (I use predator shafts on the cues).
James
masonh said:i like the 3/8-11 or the new 3/8-10 that looks like 3/8-11.it has .308" minor diameter.
masonh said:i like the 3/8-11 or the new 3/8-10 that looks like 3/8-11.it has .308" minor diameter.
matta said:Royce from OB-1 told me about an experiment he did. I'm not certain on the exact details but it went something like this.... (Maybe Royce will read this and elaborate)
He built 4 cues EXACTLY alike except different joints. 5/16x14, 3/8x10, radial, etc...
He then taped over the joints and took them to the local pool halls in Dallas, TX. Dallas has a huge pool scene with a ton of top notch players. He passed the cues around asked people to try to guess the joint type.
According to Royce, they couldn't even pick out the cue with the same joint as their personal cue. No one could tell the difference.
If you believe this experiment, it shows that the joint pin has little to do with how a cue plays.
There aren't a ton of people doing "scientific" experiments about cues. Personally, I liked this one.
my $.02,
poolplayer2093 said:i wouldn't say that. i have a cue with a 5/16-14 pin (mezz)that plays different than a schon. they more or less have the same joint type but the play is different.
poolplayer2093 said:i wouldn't say that. i have a cue with a 5/16-14 pin (mezz)that plays different than a schon. they more or less have the same joint type but the play is different.