Stats -- Accu-Stats Make-It-Happen One-Pocket Invitational, June 2016

AtLarge

AzB Gold Member
Gold Member
Silver Member
Here are some statistics from the 2016 Accu-Stats Make-It-Happen One-Pocket Invitational event played at Sandcastle Billiards in Edison, NJ, with pay-per-view streaming by Accu-Stats.

This was a 6-player event, with 15 round-robin matches (first 8 races to 3, last 7 races to 4) followed by a playoff match (race to 4) between the 2 players with the best records. Efren Reyes defeated Shane Van Boening in the playoff.

Conditions -- The conditions for this event included:
- Diamond 9-foot table with pro-cut pockets and blue Simonis 860 cloth;​
- Aramith TV Tournament balls with a measles cue ball;​
- Diamond wooden triangle rack;​
- rack your own with alternating breaks;​
- re-break if a ball is made on the break (happened 6 times, including twice in one game);​
- 60-second shot clock with one automatic 60-second extension per rack (only one violation happened); and​
- 3 fouls in a row is loss of game (did not happen),​

Match results -- The 16 matches were as follows:

Thurs., June 2 -- Tony Chohan defeated Alex Pagulayan 3-1, Shane Van Boening d. Danny Smith 3-1, Efren Reyes d. Jeremy Jones 3-0, and Van Boening d. Pagulayan 3-2.​

Fri., June 3 -- Jones d. Smith 3-1, Reyes d. Chohan 3-1, Van Boening d. Jones 3-0, and Smith d. Pagulayan 3-2.​
Sat., June 4 -- Jones d. Chohan 4-3, Reyes d. Smith 4-2, Van Boening d. Chohan 4-2, and Pagulayan d. Reyes 4-3.​
Sun., June 5 -- Chohan d. Smith 4-3, Reyes d. Van Boening 4-2, Jones d. Pagulayan 4-2, and Reyes d. Van Boening 4-3 (playoff finals).​

Records in round-robin play (5 matches per player).
Reyes -- 4-1 in matches, 17-9 in games, 155-100 in ball count
Van Boening -- 4-1, 15-9, 140-90​
Jones -- 3-2, 11-12, 96-118​
Chohan -- 2-3, 13-15, 128-137​
Smith -- 1-4, 10-16, 125-149​
Pagulayan -- 1-4, 11-16, 111-161​

Games won by breaker in round-robin play
Reyes -- 8 of 12 (67%)​
Van Boening -- 10 of 12 (83%)​
Jones -- 8 of 13 (62%)​
Chohan -- 9 of 14 (64%)​
Smith -- 5 of 13 (38%)​
Pagulayan -- 7 of 13 (54%)
Total -- 47 of 77 (61%)​


Playoff match -- won by Reyes 4-3 over Van Boening, with the total ball count in Reyes' favor 41-22. Van Boening won the lag; Reyes won on 2 of 3 breaks, Van Boening won on 2 of 4 breaks.

Matches won by winner of lag -- 8 of 16 (50%)

High run-outs (In round-robin play)
9-and-outs by Pagulayan (2) and Chohan (2)​
8-and-outs by Reyes (5), Van Boening (3), Chohan (2), Pagulayan (2), and Smith (1). None by Jones (he had one run of 8, but it wasn't an "out"). In addition, Reyes had one in the finals.​


Match lengths for races to 3 (measured from lag until last ball is pocketed or conceded, including racking and time outs)
Longest in total length (90 min.) and in average minutes per game (23) -- Chohan d. Pagulayan 3-1​
Shortest in total length (39 min.) -- Reyes d. Jones 3-0​
Shortest in average minutes per game (12) -- Reyes d. Chohan 3-1​
Average match length -- 64 min.​
Average minutes per game -- 16​


Match lengths for races to 4 (including playoff match)
Longest in total length (159 min.) and in average minutes per game (27) -- Jones d. Pagulayan 4-2​
Shortest in total length (57 min.) and in average minutes per game (10) -- Reyes d. Van Boening 4-2​
Average match length -- 104 min.​
Average minutes per game -- 16​


Average match score
For the 8 races to 3 -- 3 - 1.0​
For the 8 races to 4 -- 4 - 2.5​

Breaking from right vs. left side of table
Breaks from breaker's right side of table -- 44 of 84 (52%)​
Games won by breaker when breaking from his left side of table -- 23 of 40 ( 58%)​
Games won by breaker when breaking from his right side of table -- 28 of 44 (64%)​


Distribution of run-outs to win the 84 games:
1 ball -- 26​
2 balls -- 8​
3 balls -- 7​
4 balls -- 5​
5 balls -- 6​
6 balls -- 6​
7 balls -- 8​
8 balls -- 14​
9 balls -- 4​
 
Last edited:

AtLarge

AzB Gold Member
Gold Member
Silver Member
Ball counts by player and length of run

The total ball count for each player in his 5 round-robin matches resulted from the following runs and fouls.
[Note: Reyes and Chohan played 2 races to 3 and 3 races to 4. The other 4 players played 3 races to 3 and 2 races to 4.]

Reyes
1 ball -- 17 times​
2 balls -- 9​
3 balls -- 3​
4 balls -- 6​
5 balls -- 5​
6 balls -- 2​
7 balls -- 2​
8 balls -- 5​
9 balls -- 0​
Plus balls pocketed by opponents -- 4​
Minus fouls -- 8​
TOTAL Ball Count -- 155​

Van Boening
1 ball -- 25 times​
2 balls -- 7​
3 balls -- 2​
4 balls -- 2​
5 balls -- 2​
6 balls -- 3​
7 balls -- 5​
8 balls -- 3​
9 balls -- 0​
Plus balls pocketed by opponents -- 11​
Minus fouls -- 11​
TOTAL Ball Count -- 140​

Jones
1 ball -- 14 times​
2 balls -- 11​
3 balls -- 5​
4 balls -- 5​
5 balls -- 2​
6 balls -- 2​
7 balls -- 1​
8 balls -- 1​
9 balls -- 0​
Plus balls pocketed by opponents -- 2​
Minus fouls -- 14​
TOTAL Ball Count -- 96​

Chohan
1 ball -- 23 times​
2 balls -- 8​
3 balls -- 4​
4 balls -- 3​
5 balls -- 4​
6 balls -- 2​
7 balls -- 0​
8 balls -- 2​
9 balls -- 2​
Plus balls pocketed by opponents -- 16​
Minus fouls -- 17​
TOTAL Ball Count -- 128​

Smith
1 ball -- 27 times​
2 balls -- 9​
3 balls -- 8​
4 balls -- 4​
5 balls -- 3​
6 balls -- 1​
7 balls -- 2​
8 balls -- 1​
9 balls -- 0​
Plus balls pocketed by opponents -- 7​
Minus fouls -- 10​
TOTAL Ball Count -- 125​

Pagulayan
1 ball -- 23 times​
2 balls -- 5​
3 balls -- 5​
4 balls -- 1​
5 balls -- 2​
6 balls -- 2​
7 balls -- 2​
8 balls -- 2​
9 balls -- 2​
Plus balls pocketed by opponents -- 9​
Minus fouls -- 20​
TOTAL Ball Count -- 111​

Total for all 6 players
1 ball -- 129 times​
2 balls -- 49​
3 balls -- 27​
4 balls -- 21​
5 balls -- 18​
6 balls -- 12​
7 balls -- 12​
8 balls -- 14​
9 balls -- 4​
Plus balls pocketed by opponents -- 49​
Minus fouls -- 80​
TOTAL Ball Count -- 755​
 
Last edited:

pt109

WO double hemlock
Silver Member
Thank you, sir....I can go to bed now...:smile:

Conventional wisdom years ago said the break at one-pocket was worth a ball and a half.
....looks like it still is.....with the breaker winning 61%
..... Not sure what JJ's problem is with it...maybe the most conservative player doesn't get
the advantage enough.

Strange that Alex, with the worst record, was the only one to beat Efren.
 

King T

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Great work as always, Thanks!

I find it strange that everybody out shot Efren, but they still cant beat him. Efren needed 8 ball more times then anyone else and needed 1 or 2 balls fewer than everyone else which means he still out plays everybody no matter what the ball count.

Amazing.
 

AtLarge

AzB Gold Member
Gold Member
Silver Member
Thank you, sir....I can go to bed now...:smile:

Conventional wisdom years ago said the break at one-pocket was worth a ball and a half.
....looks like it still is.....with the breaker winning 61%
..... Not sure what JJ's problem is with it...maybe the most conservative player doesn't get
the advantage enough.

Strange that Alex, with the worst record, was the only one to beat Efren.

You sleep?

Yeah, Efren's only loss was Pagulayan's only win. Strange.

The breaker won 61% of the games this year but only 51% last year. This year's result is more consistent with what I have seen in the DCC 1-Pkt. events. And did you notice the big change in breaking side -- all but one break was from the right side last year but it was almost equal this year (52% from the right). I remember that you thought they were breaking from the wrong side last year.
 

AtLarge

AzB Gold Member
Gold Member
Silver Member
I find it strange that everybody out shot Efren, but they still cant beat him. Efren needed 8 ball more times then anyone else and needed 1 or 2 balls fewer than everyone else which means he still out plays everybody no matter what the ball count.

Amazing.

Not sure why you say everybody outshot Efren and why you use the word "needed." For example, Efren ran 8-and-outs 6 times (includes once in the playoff). His opponents scores in those games were 1, 0, 4, 0, 0, and (-1). So Efren might still have won those games had there been more innings, but, instead, he ran them out in that one visit.

Post #2 is just the number of times they had runs of each length from 1 to 9. Perhaps you misunderstood it as something else.

In the round-robin matches, Efren played 26 games and he had runs of 5 or more 14 times. Van Boening was next with 13, Jones 6, Chohan 10, Smith 7, Pagulayan 10. Efren ran balls pretty well!
 
Last edited:

1pocket

Steve Booth
Gold Member
Silver Member
Here are some statistics from the 2016 Accu-Stats Make-It-Happen One-Pocket Invitational event played at Sandcastle Billiards in Edison, NJ, with pay-per-view streaming by Accu-Stats.

This was a 6-player event, with 15 round-robin matches (first 8 races to 3, last 7 races to 4) followed by a playoff match (race to 4) between the 2 players with the best records. Efren Reyes defeated Shane Van Boening in the playoff.

Conditions -- The conditions for this event included:
- Diamond 9-foot table with pro-cut pockets and blue Simonis 860 cloth;
- Aramith TV Tournament balls with a measles cue ball;
- Diamond wooden triangle rack;
- rack your own with alternating breaks;
- re-break if a ball is made on the break (happened 6 times, including twice in one game);
- 60-second shot clock with one automatic 60-second extension per rack (only one violation happened); and
- 3 fouls in a row is loss of game (did not happen),

Match results -- The 16 matches were as follows:

Thurs., June 2 -- Tony Chohan defeated Alex Pagulayan 3-1, Shane Van Boening d. Danny Smith 3-1, Efren Reyes d. Jeremy Jones 3-0, and Van Boening d. Pagulayan 3-2.

Fri., June 3 -- Jones d. Smith 3-1, Reyes d. Chohan 3-1, Van Boening d. Jones 3-0, and Smith d. Pagulayan 3-2.

Sat., June 4 -- Jones d. Chohan 4-3, Reyes d. Smith 4-2, Van Boening d. Chohan 4-2, and Pagulayan d. Reyes 4-3.

Sun., June 5 -- Chohan d. Smith 4-3, Reyes d. Van Boening 4-2, Jones d. Pagulayan 4-2, and Reyes d. Van Boening 4-3 (playoff finals).

Records in round-robin play (5 matches per player).

  • Reyes -- 4-1 in matches, 17-9 in games, 155-100 in ball count
  • Van Boening -- 4-1, 15-9, 140-90
  • Jones -- 3-2, 11-12, 96-118
  • Chohan -- 2-3, 13-15, 128-137
  • Smith -- 1-4, 10-16, 125-149
  • Pagulayan -- 1-4, 11-16, 111-161


Games won by breaker in round-robin play
  • Reyes -- 8 of 12 (67%)
  • Van Boening -- 10 of 12 (83%)
  • Jones -- 8 of 13 (62%)
  • Chohan -- 9 of 14 (64%)
  • Smith -- 5 of 13 (38%)
  • Pagulayan -- 7 of 13 (54%)
    Total -- 47 of 77 (61%)


Playoff match -- won by Reyes 4-3 over Van Boening, with the total ball count in Reyes' favor 41-22. Van Boening won the lag; Reyes won on 2 of 3 breaks, Van Boening won on 2 of 4 breaks.

Matches won by winner of lag -- 8 of 16 (50%)

High run-outs (In round-robin play)
  • 9-and-outs by Pagulayan (2) and Chohan (2)
  • 8-and-outs by Reyes (5), Van Boening (3), Chohan (2), Pagulayan (2), and Smith (1). None by Jones (had had one run of 8, but it wasn't an "out"). In addition, Reyes had one in the finals.


Match lengths for races to 3 (measured from lag until last ball is pocketed or conceded, including racking and time outs)
  • Longest in total length (90 min.) and in average minutes per game (23) -- Chohan d. Pagulayan 3-1
  • Shortest in total length (39 min.) -- Reyes d. Jones 3-0
  • Shortest in average minutes per game (12) -- Reyes d. Chohan 3-1
  • Average match length -- 64 min.
  • Average minutes per game -- 16


Match lengths for races to 4 (including playoff match)
  • Longest in total length (159 min.) and in average minutes per game (27) -- Jones d. Pagulayan 4-2
  • Shortest in total length (57 min.) and in average minutes per game (10) -- Reyes d. Van Boening 4-2
  • Average match length -- 104 min.
  • Average minutes per game -- 16


Average match score
  • For the 8 races to 3 -- 3 - 1.0
  • For the 8 races to 4 -- 4 - 2.5

Breaking from right vs. left side of table
  • Breaks from breaker's right side of table -- 44 of 84 (52%)
  • Games won by breaker when breaking from his left side of table -- 23 of 40 ( 58%)
  • Games won by breaker when breaking from his right side of table -- 28 of 44 (64%)


Distribution of run-outs to win the 84 games:

  • 1 ball -- 26
  • 2 balls -- 8
  • 3 balls -- 7
  • 4 balls -- 5
  • 5 balls -- 6
  • 6 balls -- 6
  • 7 balls -- 8
  • 8 balls -- 14
  • 9 balls -- 4
Thank you for all the work you put in to compile and post this!!
 

King T

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
I see your point

Not sure why you say everybody outshot Efren and why you use the word "needed." For example, Efren ran 8-and-outs 6 times (includes once in the playoff). His opponents scores in those games were 1, 0, 4, 0, 0, and (-1). So Efren might still have won those games had there been more innings, but, instead, he ran them out in that one visit.

Post #2 is just the number of times they had runs of each length from 1 to 9. Perhaps you misunderstood it as something else.

In the round-robin matches, Efren played 26 games and he had runs of 5 or more 14 times. Van Boening was next with 13, Jones 6, Chohan 10, Smith 7, Pagulayan 10. Efren ran balls pretty well!

I misunderstood the ball count, wasn't able to watch, thanks for the break down.
 

jsp

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Thanks for the stats, AtLarge.

Based on the results of this tournament (I haven't seen it), would anyone here think that Shane has overtaken Alex as the superior one pocket player? Or, is it likely Shane would entertain gambling one-hole with Alex even?
 

AtLarge

AzB Gold Member
Gold Member
Silver Member
Fouls averaged 1.0 per game (86 fouls, 84 games).

Balls pocked for the opponent averaged 0.6 per game (54 balls, 84 games).

[Includes playoff match.]
 

Poolhall60561

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Mr Large, thanks for all that good data. Pat could of used you 30 years ago when all he wanted to do was collect stats.
 

Jfred

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Thanks to AtLarge for outstanding coverage again.

I am constantly amazed at not only AtLarge's dedication to this game of pool, but moreover on his ability to make salient points not only on the current matches but also on their historical relationships.

AtLarge is constant in his vigilance from the time we go on air until the time we sign off.

And THEN is when his real work starts. Collecting the data is one thing - presenting it in an interesting format is quite another.

I agree that we could have used AtLarge's talents 30 years ago.

I'm just glad he is with us today.

Thanks,
Jim
 
Top