Search results

wow, crazy hilarious outrageous funny you bored or something? 'nother 2mins of my life wasted with NPR level nothingness

yes.

also, a huge amount of screen space lost to displaying the tournament title... what a waste

there's a promising open source project, but it's still limited in its functionality, and lacks a few general features. also it's been programmed with a special tournament setup in mind, which makes it hard to adapt to setups in pool, like Round Robin to Single Elim or Double Elim to Single...

...just use challonge, or cuescore.

Hi Zach, first of all, I really like what you are doing at Digital Pool. The model you are mentioning is not ppv, though, it's the exact opposite, rather like pay per week or so. There may be folks who would go with that, but I can't (and won't) afford 60 bucks, just to watch two or three matches.

yes! wow!

On the official page, you see quite a number of 9-8 results, so that doesn't support what's been said https://qbsf.qa/ui/events/event?eventCategoryId=06e724c3-eac0-4486-458f-08dbbce53484

or use the official page

Probably a good warm up for the upcoming US Open, this tournament features a good part of the creme de la creme in Pool right now. They all come when Jayson calls ;) Draw and results on cuescore.com

at least the photos look awesome @Korsakoff

rising deflection could also be attributed to sinking shot speed. I agree with @Nick B here: to be scientific, we would need much more data points... On the other hand, when I think of hardness comparisons of cue tips and what people report on these tips and what everybody "feels", a...

Kindergarten

if the situation allows it, yes, probably. also makes sense, reproducability-wise, right...?

I'd like to recommend a video to you to find your optimum bridge distance: It's in German, from Christian Reimering, but you might get the idea from the stripes on the table. Basically the distance between your bridge hand and the cue ball is the same as the distance from your elbow to the wrist.

@Cameron Smith @stewie you realize you're now arguing about tournaments and copyrights, not player restrictions...(which is what all of this was about, originally)

I understand that much, I believe. But what about me doing a tournament in the Fairfield Inn across the road, a week later? Would the guys who were in the Turning Stone be prohibited from playing at the Fairfield? Where's the line?

Two statements next to each other, heavily contradicting each other. I understand that in the first answer, it's about the players, who shall not compete in a similar event from a non-MR promoter. In the second answer, she embraces a possible market competition - just not with the same...

thank you, @azhousepro for publishing the tournament on digitalpool! Like that I could "participate" without attending ;) thx @kingwang for pointing it out.

How many players will ever be able to make a living from MR events? 128? 256? Not yet, actually. And while that might be 128 or 256 more than before, until they were where they are now they have in some way profited from federations' work. Federations are doing the base work, at least that's...