I pivot to compensate for deflection and that's it. Although it is a part of how I aim, it isn't done simply to help me aim. I line up center cue ball dead red to the ghost ball spot. I've learned by rote the pivot I need for the specific amount of spin and speed I'm looking for. I simply apply the proper pivot and execute the stroke. In my brain I'm not actually changing my aiming point, it is still the ghost ball spot. The actual adjustments needed for squirt, swerve and throw are made subconsciously and naturally.
The aiming systems, imo, are a way of trying to explain things that a lot of us have learned to do without a lot of thought into it, but with a butt load of practice. A reverse engineering of sorts to try and speed up the learning curve. I understand the desire to skip the "hit a million balls" routine. I think there is a bit lost in translation with some of these systems. They seem like they are trying to explain "feel". "Feel" is the true art form of pool, it is the medium in which we work with. No matter how many words You use, you can't simply explain to a musician how to be expressive and emotive, that comes from real world experience. Same thing here. At the end of the day whatever system you use will only get you kind of close, the rest will have to be learned by experience.
Sent from my LG-H918 using Tapatalk