Palmer Cue Find this week_ Szamboti Forearm?

TATE

AzB Gold Mensch
Silver Member
Here's the Model 12 I think is a Szamboti forearm. This cue has a very nicely veneered blank but it was turned slightly offset. Two sides show uneven and two sides are even (veneers and prongs). This is typical of a cue that was not properly centered on the lathe. The veneer miters are super clean, tight and very even, even up close.
 

Attachments

  • Palmer full cue.jpg
    Palmer full cue.jpg
    157.3 KB · Views: 410
  • Palmer side 1.jpg
    Palmer side 1.jpg
    173.5 KB · Views: 399
  • Palmer side 2.jpg
    Palmer side 2.jpg
    177 KB · Views: 410
  • Palmer uneven.jpg
    Palmer uneven.jpg
    176.6 KB · Views: 412
Last edited:

mikemosconi

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Thank you very much- I appreciate the feedback! Thanks to everyone for shedding some light on this for me.
 

forabeer

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Interesting . . . MikeMosconi"s Model12 and Tate's Model 12 each have PALMER logo on the buttcap but in a different font.

Which one is older and does that make a difference???
 

TATE

AzB Gold Mensch
Silver Member
Interesting . . . MikeMosconi"s Model12 and Tate's Model 12 each have PALMER logo on the buttcap but in a different font.

Which one is older and does that make a difference???

His is older. His cue is actually imprinted. They stopped doing that after awhile because the pressure needed to imprint the buttcap sometimes weakened the plastic. They went to a slide decal with a clear coat.

By the way, looking at Mike's pictures, that may be an epoxy finish. It might be original or it could be a finish over the epoxy. The epoxy was thick and yellowed over time. My cue originally had an epoxy finish too - it was pretty cracked up so Scot Sherbine refinished it for me.

The 3rd catalog cues were primarily from the 1970's but could be ordered through the 1980's. They would use whatever ebony blanks were on hand at the time and put a decal on the buttcap. They dropped the epoxy after a few years because it was too prone to cracking and chipping.
 
Last edited:

Cuebuddy

Mini cues
Silver Member
His is older. His cue is actually imprinted. They stopped doing that after awhile because the pressure needed to imprint the buttcap sometimes weakened the plastic. They went to a slide decal with a clear coat.

By the way, looking at Mike's pictures, that may be an epoxy finish. It might be original o it could be a finish over the epoxy. The epoxy was thick and yellowed over time. My cue originally had an epoxy finish too - it was pretty cracked up so Scot Sherbine refinished it for me.

The 3rd catalog cues were primarily from the 1970's but could be ordered through the 1980's. They would use whatever ebony blanks were on hand at the time and put a decal on the buttcap. They dropped the epoxy after a few years because it was too prone to cracking and chipping.

Tate I have the upmost respect for you for your knowledge and contributions to this site....but the concrete pavers verses vintage cue has me freaking out:p

Cuebuddy>>>needs a softer touch
 

TATE

AzB Gold Mensch
Silver Member
Tate I have the upmost respect for you for your knowledge and contributions to this site....but the concrete pavers verses vintage cue has me freaking out:p

Cuebuddy>>>needs a softer touch

But the pictures come out so good! I put the cues on the pool table and the reflections suck.

By the way, I put those paver circles in myself. A bunch of different shapes that lock themselves in. Two 10' circles in my yard, one with a fire pit. It's like putting together a jigsaw puzzle.
 

Cuebuddy

Mini cues
Silver Member
Back in the day I was a flat worker. Poured mud and did pavers for years, even placed asphalt. You did a fine job. I would still trust you with my cues:grin:
 

mikemosconi

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
It must be an epoxy finish because it is very thick and I can see how the forearm looks a little yellowed. The finish is not cracking at all- thankfully, except a little chipping at the bottom of the butt cap.
 

forabeer

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
A very cool garage sale find regardless of forearm origin.
Hell, the Palmer Deluxe Case by itself is cool.

Congrats.
 

mikemosconi

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Here is the Palmer Deluxe Case- just about mint condition!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0545.jpg
    IMG_0545.jpg
    67.1 KB · Views: 215

u12armresl

One Pocket back cutter
Silver Member
PRED, don't ask him if he wants validation or what he paid. ROFL

Post pics of a cue, ask everyone for help, talk about the greatest garage find, "that's really cool, can I ask what you paid for it?"

I sell cues and I can't reveal that info because if it was a Szamboti forearm, I can really stick it to some people.

If you knew all this info, why ask? You want validation more than you want the truth.
 

mikemosconi

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
PRED, don't ask him if he wants validation or what he paid. ROFL

Post pics of a cue, ask everyone for help, talk about the greatest garage find, "that's really cool, can I ask what you paid for it?"

I sell cues and I can't reveal that info because if it was a Szamboti forearm, I can really stick it to some people.

Honestly don't know what in the world you are talking about- I have NO intention of selling this cue- no matter if Szamboti was involved in it or not - yes I have sold a lot of cues- but either way- no one's business what I paid for it. How could I 'stick it to someone" anyhow if it was a Szamboti forearm- it would just be represented for what it was.
I really don't understand some of the people on this site- some of you look for any way to turn around discussions into accusations, alternative motivations, and confrontations that have no place here at all. Why can't people here just share opinions, ask for clarifications, present alternative possibilities, and then come to a satisfactory conclusion? That's ALL I was trying to do here! What in the world is all this negativity- I don't need this and I am sure many others here would agree with me.
A word to the wise- some free advice- do whatever you want with it - but maybe you and PRED should spend more time in life making friends and not looking to to turn discussions into personal attacks simply because you don't like what you hear- life's too short my friend!
 
Last edited:

u12armresl

One Pocket back cutter
Silver Member
IF you have no intention of selling it, what in the earthly galaxy would telling someone what you paid for it hurt?


Honestly don't know what in the world you are talking about- I have NO intention of selling this cue- no matter if Szamboti was involved in it or not - yes I have sold a lot of cues- but either way- no one's business what I paid for it. How could I 'stick it to someone" anyhow if it was a Szamboti forearm- it would just be represented for what it was.
I really don't understand some of the people on this site- some of you look for any way to turn around discussions into accusations, alternative motivations, and confrontations that have no place here at all. Why can't people here just share opinions, ask for clarifications, present alternative possibilities, and then come to a satisfactory conclusion? That's ALL I was trying to do here! What in the world is all this negativity- I don't need this and I am sure many others here would agree with me.
A word to the wise- some free advice- do whatever you want with it - but maybe you and PRED should spend more time in life making friends and not looking to to turn discussions into personal attacks simply because you don't like what you hear- life's too short my friend!
 

Chopdoc

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Also the forearm is straight maple, not BEM. The points are ebony and the veneers from the inside out are natural, orange, chartreuse, and ebony- although the outer two veneers are so tight together that it is hard even under a magnifier to discern.
would anyone know if this signifies a Szamboti possibility with this 3rd catalog Palmer?

Looks to be Adam blank.

Nice find.

Curious why one would think such features signify a Szam blank. Helmstetter certainly knew what he was doing when he set up that production.

none of them this old are perfect.

Really? I have some. :smile: But the finish is peeling on the bottom of yours, so not perfect.

As for what i paid for it at the tag sale-I never reveal that- I sell many cues that I find this way.

Personally, I never hide anything about a cue that I show, including what I got it for. I don't feel it has anything to do with what I might sell it for. But to each his own.

If I don't want to tell, I don't show.

But that's me.

It’s common knowledge that Palmer was sourcing blanks from Adam during production of the Third Catalog cues.

It would benefit the discussion if you would post close-ups of the forearm and veneers of this cue.

Common knowledge indeed. :thumbup: But perhaps not for everyone.

Still a Palmer. Still assembled and finished in their shop. Still a nice find.

Close-ups would be great.

.
 

mikemosconi

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
To answer some of your questions:

1. The height of the points had me wondering about the blank since other Palmers I have seen had shorter points and I had read the Szamboti points on Palmers came up higher than others. I also thought that Szamboti used those veneer colors for Palmer cues at times. Also, this cue plays different ( better than other Palmers from my experience- a crisper hit- maybe the ebony? Also, this cue was from early in the third catalog by the imprint on the buttcap, did not know Adam contributed to early 70s Palmers.

2. By most older cues not being perfect- I was referring to the straightness of the cue- especially the shafts. I have never seen 50 year old cues with perfectly straight original shafts- maybe they do exist. These shafts are very clean, like new clean, full 13mm and 12 inch pro taper, but slight wobble.

3. As for price paid- I mentioned that I am keeping this cue- not for sale- but I do sell cues at times, what does what I paid for it have to do with showing a garage sale find? I once paid $3 at a garage sale for a mint Palmer custom cue from the PB catalog, a $400 billiard chair, and a $300 billiard cue rack - about $1200 worth of billiard equipment. I have had other similar finds in cues, watches, golf equip. cameras, ivory tusks, antiques clocks, musical instruments; you name it- Garage sales have been a hobby and sometimes side business for me for 25 years. I have never paid more than $100 for any item. Some I KEEP AND SOME I SELL - but I DO think that if I attempt to sell something worth $1000 and someone knows I paid $5 for it - they would be inclined to offer a lower price- I know that I would.

I thank you for your response and i will post some close ups on the points today.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0647.jpg
    IMG_0647.jpg
    68.6 KB · Views: 238
  • IMG_0666.JPG
    IMG_0666.JPG
    27.2 KB · Views: 230
  • IMG_0683.jpg
    IMG_0683.jpg
    56.1 KB · Views: 232
  • IMG_0691.JPG
    IMG_0691.JPG
    23.5 KB · Views: 239

ideologist

I don't never exaggerate
Silver Member
To answer some of your questions:

1. The height of the points had me wondering about the blank since other Palmers I have seen had shorter points and I had read the Szamboti points on Palmers came up higher than others. I also thought that Szamboti used those veneer colors for Palmer cues at times. Also, this cue plays different ( better than other Palmers from my experience- a crisper hit- maybe the ebony? Also, this cue was from early in the third catalog by the imprint on the buttcap, did not know Adam contributed to early 70s Palmers.

2. By most older cues not being perfect- I was referring to the straightness of the cue- especially the shafts. I have never seen 50 year old cues with perfectly straight original shafts- maybe they do exist. These shafts are very clean, like new clean, full 13mm and 12 inch pro taper, but slight wobble.

3. As for price paid- I mentioned that I am keeping this cue- not for sale- but I do sell cues at times, what does what I paid for it have to do with showing a garage sale find? I once paid $3 at a garage sale for a mint Palmer custom cue from the PB catalog, a $400 billiard chair, and a $300 billiard cue rack - about $1200 worth of billiard equipment. I have had other similar finds in cues, watches, golf equip. cameras, ivory tusks, antiques clocks, musical instruments; you name it- Garage sales have been a hobby and sometimes side business for me for 25 years. I have never paid more than $100 for any item. Some I KEEP AND SOME I SELL - but I DO think that if I attempt to sell something worth $1000 and someone knows I paid $5 for it - they would be inclined to offer a lower price- I know that I would.

I thank you for your response and i will post some close ups on the points today.

It's still an Adam forearm, looks like a nice little player
 

mikemosconi

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Thanks for the response. I feel now that I have confirmation on that point ( no pun intended). It is just good to know, as one who appreciates cues, what you have or what you don't have. I never intended to sell this particular cue, as I regret not having the other Palmers I once owned. I'll leave this one to my sons, as they are some of the few 30 year olds who know about cue history and appreciate the significance of my custom cue collection. This is a rare Palmer from one of the first three catalogs, so that, in and of itself, gives it great value to me, as well as the fantastic original condition of the cue and a mint Palmer Deluxe case to boot!
 

sonny burnett

Registered
It's not like an Adam blank is a bad thing for a player. I prefer them to most anything current production.

Nice find!

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
 

maha

from way back when
Silver Member
even say he paid 20 bucks for it. and obviously he got a good deal at a rummage sale. but it doesnt matter. when he sells it if he ever does, he is entitled to get full market value.

what you paid for something has no bearing on what you should or can sell it for.
 
Top