Question for Danny:. . . Months upon months and still no video evidence oh I really think the 626 is an absolute sham, only time will tell, those narcissists who make the public wait to see evidence will have to answer eventually.
We all know that even in major 14.1 competitions either player (or both players) may request a very brief biology break of any sort. During John's multi-hours run, there unquestionably would have been a few such typical play-interruptions.
We can assume "dead air" if the recording equipment stayed on during such time-outs, and that these equipment-idle, information-free and irrelevant minutes would be edited out for continuity.
For the mass of eventual viewers, devoid of any sham suspicions or equipment-compromising suspicions, I believe 99% will be rigorously satisfied that the publicly viewable finished video meets the scientific standard of extraordinary evidence for all extraordinary claims (claims regarding alleged events, scientific results, novel inventions, or medical advances).
I completely agree that every instance you've cited of John's interference and bad behavior and words toward you (and other people) in past encounters was unprofessional and uncivil. Many well-known actors and musicians have been guilty of equally harmful and offensive lapses throughout their careers. Most of the public manages to appreciate the value and quality of their respective performances in spite of the alarming bouts of incivility.
I guess my question is, can you envision a point where the forthcoming video of the run -- probably edited for strictly understandable reasons -- can be considered in your mind as acceptable and coherent evidence that the extraordinary run did occur?
Arnaldo