and if I'm an APA 9? Does the world end due to this conundrum ?:slap:
Well actually...if you're not a good enough player to understand what I'm talking about,
I guess you'll just never know. A good player knows what I'm saying.
No need to respond if you are an APA 5 or lower.
.
I feel exactly the same way. I have always admired cues where the beauty of the wood did the talking and not much cared for the bling. Therefore when I took an interest in building cues last year that was my goal. Make a solid cue that's pretty and plays well. Plus all the ornaments take a hell of a lot more skill and time to build, thus the expense. I don't think my interest and available time will allow me to get to that level even if I wanted to. Here are some cues I'm building right now that are almost complete. My next batch will have stitch rings and that's about it. I may do some inlays in the future and for sure points, but minimally. Less is more in that area IMO
View attachment 411910
View attachment 411909
JC
Let's not create an argument that doesn't exist. In what universe are people telling new players that they will never get good unless they can afford a $500 cue??? None.
20 times or more a year, someone asks about low cost cues, with the inevitable "not the arrow, but it's the Native American..." And every time, someone (many someones) point out any number of great-playing cues available today that are under $100 including Schmelke, Dufferin, Players, and McDermott-designed Lucky or Star cues.
But, at the same time, people can spend whatever the hell they want. If they want to spend thousands, that's fine. It's not up to anyone to dictate on what and how they spend their own money.
I am still looking for my daily player and what I have found is that most starter cues have either some sort of wrap or some gaudy configuration of inlays, points e.t.c. I wholeheartedly endorse your philosophy. Too bad, the bocote's not for sale
Got 1 a few weeks ago, very good.$100 Schmelke sp is pretty tough to beat.
If I've done it right, I've attached a few pictures of a cue that's beaten me a few times tonight and dozens of times in the past, along with the help of a little guy who claims he's been shooting since the age of six and won't reveal his current age. I've always been an "arrow not the Indian" guy (who isn't?) and some of you who might not get out much might mistake him for being an Injun, but he's actually Filipino. He's no world beater by any means but he haunts the bar tourneys around here with some degree of menace.
He wields the mighty Cuetec Excalibur, which seems to come in around $60 at a good price. I've taken a few shots with it and my guess at its composition is that it may have a lead bumper and helium core shaft.
The wrap is his own design. I assume that's genuine duct tape near the forearm but one can never be sure these days. The rest of the fancy dual-colored grip you're seeing has the consistency of skateboard grip tape. I can't be certain what it is but it leaves my hand raw and bleeding. I suspect it's piranha skin.
He does his own tip installations. I told him why I was taking pictures of his cue and the nature of the thread and he wanted me to pass on that the only thing that matters is the tip.
Despite that, he's totally dedicated to one fancy chalk. I believe it's known as pre-WWII Masters which he painstakingly hand-kilns with a Bic lighter.
A good playing shaft is much more important TO ME than the butt of the cue.
.
When playing on a bar box, cheap cues will work fine.
Once you graduate to a 9 foot table, you will need something better.
Like instead of an old VW, you need to go to a Cadillac to play on a 9 footer.
Cheap cues do not work good on 9 foot tables.
.
You simply do not play well enough to understand (according to him). That must be my problem, as well, since I can't make sense of his statement either.What??? I understand not bringing a fancy cue to a bar to play with, but not using a cheap cue because of table size is absurd....
You simply do not play well enough to understand (according to him). That must be my problem, as well, since I can't make sense of his statement either.
Oh well, I still have fun, even if I'm using a cheap cue.
Sent from my VS985 4G using Tapatalk