I questioned this method of selling cues once before and got a not-so-friendly pm from Dean. I'll try one last time to voice my concerns over it and then I'm done with discussing Dean's method of selling these cues.
If you have to hide your product behind a "grab bag" method of sales, it speaks volumes. I'ts incredibly unlikely that anyone is going to give away time and money by giving you a cue worth more than what you pay for it. A $500-600 investment is going to yield you a a cue worth =< $500-600.
That said, if you're marketing cues in that price range, most buyers that are willing to look at purchasing in that range are doing so because it's all they can afford. To them, it's probably a lot of money. I can't think of too many reasons why someone would buy something sight unseen, with no knowledge before or after purchase, of who made it when to them, it's a big spend.
Now, if Dean has friends that are willing to vouch for him, and want to play his roulette-grab bag style of selling cues, then good for him. I do find it odd that I've yet to see a posted pic of one of the cues, which I can only assume (ugly word, I know), is because most of the cues have went to Dean's close friends who are working to keep the mystery intact.
This is not so much a knock on Dean and his cues, as an explanation of why I would never buy one, and why most folks I know with a budget in the range of of said cues would never partake either. It's as simple as, if you have to hide your product in a veil of secrecy (the maker, not the cue itself), there's a reason.
Good luck to you and your preferred method of cue sales Dean, but it's not for me. As for Jack, I hope his family's health issues work themselves out.