Now THAT's funny!!.You still haven't explained why you bought a sanded down Revo...
Now THAT's funny!!.You still haven't explained why you bought a sanded down Revo...
Before you edit it again...
I bought a joss cue with a 11.5ish mm maple regular end mass regular deflection shaft. It worked as well. Victory is mine. Playing great with no deflection is nice. I can see why everyone is trying to design a shaft to play this way.
So ALL the major LD shaft makers are full of s^&t and this nimrod nodefl. is right???? Seriously??? When you are proven to be 10000000000000% wrong, its time to stfu and crawl back into your mama's basement.
Lots of major tournaments coming up so you can show the world. :thumbup:
Oh no I better not edit my post or I will look foolish.
We cannot completely avoid deflection as is being claimed by OP. Best we can do is to reduce it or compensate for it.
no
thats not what makes you look foolish
Is that you, Steve?
Facts = Things that were shown to be correct
Not Facts = words without proof, especially those that counter all other known information
What you are probably doing is causing the cuebeall to curve back in line after it deflects with an off center and elevated hit. You are not actually making the shaft have no deflection, you are compensating for that deflection and are just confused about what you are actually doing. I see it all the time, people do something in 10 steps, but the result they want was achieved in step 3, they are just repeating other steps because at some point they did all that and it worked. But their knowledge of the topic was not enough to know the rest of the stuff was useless.
You masse the ball enough so it hits the target and think you invented some new method of cheating physics. That is the only thing you can possibly be doing that can exists in this universe under our physical laws. It is impossible to make a solid object react the way you say you are doing it without a system that can react faster than the interactions between those objects. Period. Video and tests, video and tests. Or this post is nothing but wasted space done by someone that likes to hear themselves talk.
Now if you said "I have a great way to compensate my aiming and shooting for deflection" that is a sane statement. Saying "I can make my cue not deflect the cueball" is something else.
I was referring to something that predated the R.E.M. song.
Bob dude i love the lamb!
Delusional and stubborn. This wingnut is completely off-the-air.
You've been thinking this way for so long it's too big to fail, in your own mind.
That's a beautiful house of cards. I hope the wind doesn't blow.
Sent from my LG-H918 using Tapatalk
You still haven't explained why you bought a sanded down Revo...
Who is Steve.
no
thats not what makes you look foolish
Steve is the slightly racist and comical name given to white folks who look like narcotic officers/plain clothes on the streets of west Baltimore. If you have 3 or 4 clean cut county boys in a car you will often hear a loud chorus of “Steve! Steve! Steve!” And it will spread like wild fire, shutting down your action, whether it be nefarious or customertorial.
As far as tip contact time, it does seem unreasonable that all contacts would be the exact same time, but close enough as makes no anyhow. The idea that a longer contact time would somehow influence how the cue ball reacts, and even more delicious...influence how the object ball reacts when hit with this “over contacted” cue ball..this idea is creative thinking at its zenith. What’s zenith?