Your Photo is invisible try, loading again. Your fire a Blank, not photo visible.
Sometimes images are tricky for new members.... Here it is:
View attachment 551939
Look like second-level Hyatts or Aramiths from the 1980s or earlier.
Good condition -- should play fine.
The fonts of the numbers are slightly different. For example the lines on the 12 look much thicker than on the 11.On another site, an individual said they seem like a mix and match set but I have no idea how they can come up with that from the picture.
The fonts of the numbers are slightly different. For example the lines on the 12 look much thicker than on the 11.
If the balls all weigh within a few grams of each other, I wouldn't worry about it.
On another site, an individual said they seem like a mix and match set but I have no idea how they can come up with that from the picture.
Hyatt Supremes or Brunswick Gold Crowns(made by Hyatt for Brunswick). And a nice looking set, at that. Phenolic resin. Strong ball.
Your set has the old style 8-ball. The were probably made in the 60s.
Each person that responds makes me not want to play with them as they sound super valuable
Each person that responds makes me not want to play with them as they sound super valuable
I think they have no collector value. Using them for a couple of years is not going to put any mileage on them compared to what they already have.
I agree with Boxcar that they are probably Hyatts. That would make them neither Brunswick nor Aramith. Brunswick hasn't been involved with making balls since the change to phenolics and likely contracted out clay balls before then.Is it more likely that they are aramith or brunswick gold?
I agree with Boxcar that they are probably Hyatts. That would make them neither Brunswick nor Aramith. Brunswick hasn't been involved with making balls since the change to phenolics and likely contracted out clay balls before then.
Each person that responds makes me not want to play with them as they sound super valuable