In the main forum is a thread about eye movement. The are a lot a statements like.....”look at the CB then look at the OB.”
Is this really true? Cause if it is, your looking at the wrong place.
Just freeze two balls together such that one OB is dead on into a pocket. Place the CB somewhere on the table as for a cut shot. Get in your shooting position such as if to send the CB to hit the ball frozen to the OB that is going into the pocket.
If you look at the OB that is being sent to the pocket, you are not looking where the CB is going. The CB is going to the ball that’s frozen to the OB, not the OB going in the pocket.
Doing this results in the CB path that is not on your line of sight to the OB that is going in the pocket. Your looking at the OB, but the CB is going to the frozen ball.
So this makes me wonder how you can be looking at a OB but still send the CB to a spot you are not looking at?
Or they really aren’t looking at the OB, but just think there are, and really looking where the CB needs to be?
Is this really true? Cause if it is, your looking at the wrong place.
Just freeze two balls together such that one OB is dead on into a pocket. Place the CB somewhere on the table as for a cut shot. Get in your shooting position such as if to send the CB to hit the ball frozen to the OB that is going into the pocket.
If you look at the OB that is being sent to the pocket, you are not looking where the CB is going. The CB is going to the ball that’s frozen to the OB, not the OB going in the pocket.
Doing this results in the CB path that is not on your line of sight to the OB that is going in the pocket. Your looking at the OB, but the CB is going to the frozen ball.
So this makes me wonder how you can be looking at a OB but still send the CB to a spot you are not looking at?
Or they really aren’t looking at the OB, but just think there are, and really looking where the CB needs to be?