Very Nice , not so sneaky any more , Pretty snappy . Jim
I am not really a fan of the thick ringwork, but I guess that is personal.
I would have preferred the center part of the ring to be about 1/3 thinner and the black
and white rings on either side a little thinner aswell.
Also, I think it would look better if you had alligned the grain of the wood in the buttsleeve,
that is assuming the buttsleeve was from the same piece of wood.
gr. Dave
I love the fact that you took the time an effort to core a SP.
That speaks volumes to your attitude as a CM.
Nice work Kim.
Rick
Dave...
I did the large ring work to be an eye grabber on an other wise bland SP.... When I do rings like that ... I make the width .200 at the butt cap, .175 at the bottom of the handle. .150 at the A joint (this cue doesn't have one) and .125 at the joint and shaft.
I assure you that the grain is aligned in the butt..... I marked it with a marker before I sectioned it and realigned it when I glued it up........... remember it is wood and the grain is twisted and not in a straight line..............
Kim
Hello Kim,
As mentioned, the ringwork is personal so if you like it and the buyer likes it then all is well.
I did look at the grain again real close and I just don't see it lining up, at least in the pictures.
I highlighted a big dark bit of grain and a long thin line of dark grain that I just don't see in the buttsleeve.
Again, maybe it is just the pictures in which case everything is fine, but I would hate to think
that you think I am just saying things.
gr. Dave