I'm not sure if this has been experimented or not or if it has been discussed already.
We have:
A 58" 19oz cue with a 4oz shaft and 15 oz butt
A 58" 19 oz cue with a 3 oz shaft and 16 oz butt
A 58" 19 oz cue with 5 oz shaft and 14 oz butt.
Butt and shaft tapers are all the same.
I don't believe any of these cues can produce more or less spin than the other.
My question is, do any of these cues require more or less energy to produce the same tip speed with the same pull back distance, grip and bridge placement?
While on the topic of pull back distance:
Which do you think produces more cueball spin/speed.
a 12" pullback with a 6" follow through or a 6" pullback with a 12" follow through?
We have:
A 58" 19oz cue with a 4oz shaft and 15 oz butt
A 58" 19 oz cue with a 3 oz shaft and 16 oz butt
A 58" 19 oz cue with 5 oz shaft and 14 oz butt.
Butt and shaft tapers are all the same.
I don't believe any of these cues can produce more or less spin than the other.
My question is, do any of these cues require more or less energy to produce the same tip speed with the same pull back distance, grip and bridge placement?
While on the topic of pull back distance:
Which do you think produces more cueball spin/speed.
a 12" pullback with a 6" follow through or a 6" pullback with a 12" follow through?