Most screen IDs by a single member.What exact record got broken?
Sent from the future.
Most screen IDs by a single member.What exact record got broken?
The exhibition high run record at 14.1. For further info on the record, you can contact the BCA.
...at least it's not hot tubs
Already scheduled for other stuff. I see there will be one in March near Anaheim.
I think anything on the east coast will have to be connected with travel to a tournament due to transportation costs.
The exhibition high run record at 14.1. For further info on the record, you can contact the BCA.
And your credentials are?all well and good, but in the end it isnt an official record and anyone declaring it as such lowers their own credibility. and that is the point.
Right? Doesn't Matter. Keep on typing, nobody's listening to the keyboards.
The bell tolls. Even the guru's and other pro's are now snubbing their noses at this claim in denial. Most pool players wouldn't sit that long for free to watch the same shooter playing himself.
Right? Doesn't Matter. Keep on typing, nobody's listening to the keyboards.
The bell tolls. Even the guru's and other pro's are now snubbing their noses at this claim in denial. Most pool players wouldn't sit that long for free to watch the same shooter playing himself.
Stop inserting your nonsense into quotes from me. It makes me seem insane.Right? Doesn't Matter. Keep on typing, nobody's listening to the keyboards.
The bell tolls. Even the guru's and other pro's are now snubbing their noses at this claim in denial. Most pool players wouldn't sit that long for free to watch the same shooter playing himself.
I have a background in hot tubs, but Mike said I'm not allowed to show those videos on the forum anymore. Rules are dumb!
And your credentials are?
Sent from the future.
I agree somewhat with you. As a top player and a historian of pool I think every argument is meaningful to preserve history. I want to believe John ran 626 and he probably did. Also to note john is a great Player for sure, however taking all the shortcut and modifying everything possible and creating an advantage way above any standards that are in place is the biggest issues.As this thread slowly approached 50 pages, I get to wondering just WGAF if he ran 6, 60, 600, or 6000.
What difference to anyone on here does it make?
Will it affect your day, week, month, or year?
Does it make you worry or keep you up at night?
I figure he may have made 626 balls. I just don't consider it beating Mosconi's record, since it wasn't under the same conditions with the same type of equipment.
And, if he ran 999 on the exact same table Willie used, it still wouldn't cause me to get my undies in a bunch, like it seems to do for a lot of you on here.
I agree somewhat with you. As a top player and a historian of pool I think every argument is meaningful to preserve history. I want to believe John ran 626 and he probably did. Also to note john is a great Omar for sure, however taking all the shortcut and modifying everything possible and creating an advantage way above any standards that are in place is the biggest issues.
Then the next thing is really important.
What record did he John break anyways?
The highest run on video for sure but not the highest run and not the highest Exhibition run. Both of those record belong to Arthur (Babe Cranfield at a total of 768.
What did we call the 526?
I guess that would be first step to answering that question?
A high Fargo Rate and $1.50 will get you medium coffee at McDonald's.Probably better than the two guys at the BCA who "certified" the run.
Gotta wonder what kind of FargoRate those two guys have, lol.
Lou Figueroa
It was an exhibition run at straight pool. It used to be the record.What did we call the 526? ...