I was playing an eight ball game last night and my opponent was using the bridge and after he made the shot the Bridge hit two balls ... what is the ruling when the bridge Hits 2 balls when lifting it up and away ? Thanks
As the rule states, it is about ball/s in play.
Your opponent did not touch any ball "in play", and if there was no referee, you as incoming player have choice of moving balls back or not.
20. FOULS BY TOUCHING BALLS. It is a foul to strike, touch or in any way make contact with the cue ball in play or any object balls in play with anything (the body, clothing, chalk, mechanical bridge, cue shaft, etc.) EXCEPT the cue tip (while attached to the cue shaft), which may contact the cue ball in the execution of a legal shot. Whenever a referee is presiding over a match, any object ball moved during a standard foul must be returned as closely as possible to its original position as judged by the referee, and the incoming player does not have the option of restoration.
The fact that two balls were moved makes it a foul.
It wouldn't be a foul if only one ball was moved & that ball did not have an effect on the outcome of the shot.
The fact that two balls were moved makes it a foul.
It wouldn't be a foul if only one ball was moved & that ball did not have an effect on the outcome of the shot.
20. FOULS BY TOUCHING BALLS. It is a foul to strike, touch or in any way make contact with the cue ball in play or any object balls in play with anything (the body, clothing, chalk, mechanical bridge, cue shaft, etc.) EXCEPT the cue tip (while attached to the cue shaft), which may contact the cue ball in the execution of a legal shot. Whenever a referee is presiding over a match, any object ball moved during a standard foul must be returned as closely as possible to its original position as judged by the referee, and the incoming player does not have the option of restoration.
The fact that two balls were moved makes it a foul.
It wouldn't be a foul if only one ball was moved & that ball did not have an effect on the outcome of the shot.
The fact that two balls were moved makes it a foul.
It wouldn't be a foul if only one ball was moved & that ball did not have an effect on the outcome of the shot.
I was playing an eight ball game last night and my opponent was using the bridge and after he made the shot the Bridge hit two balls ... what is the ruling when the bridge Hits 2 balls when lifting it up and away ? Thanks
"did not have an effect on the outcome of the shot." - This is one that people will constantly have arguments over. If only one ball had been moved by the bridge, was it okay, or does that mean the bridge should never have been placed where it was in order to be able to make the shot thereby having an effect on the outcome? :shrug:
:sorry:
This is correctThe fact that two balls were moved makes it a foul.
It wouldn't be a foul if only one ball was moved & that ball did not have an effect on the outcome of the shot.
Nope. That only applies to one object ball. More then one moved is a foul wih no restoration allowed.As the rule states, it is about ball/s in play.
Your opponent did not touch any ball "in play", and if there was no referee, you as incoming player have choice of moving balls back or not.
Based on the info presented here, you are correct.I got asked about a situation where a player had shot, and accidentally knocked the 8 ball into a pocket with his cue. (BCA 8 ball tournament)
I told them just put the 8 back where it was.
They somehow ended up spotting it
I later looked up the rule above, and it seems I made the right call.
Nothing else moved, (a) through (d) didn't happen. So restoration seems right to me.
Does anyone else interpret this differently?
This is the correct answer. Rule 20 does not address the question that was asked.I do believe this is 100% correct. But rules change all the time. There's nothing more humiliating than arguing with a player about a supposed foul, one you know has always been a foul, and then the ref comes over with the newest rule a book and shows you how wrong you are.:embarrassed2: