WheatCues said:Not at the present moment !!!
In my honest opinion.... I have hit with a full-splice and the traditional half-splice cue built from the same cuemaker and as a "PLAYER" I cannot tell he difference...
Especially since the majority of the playability and hit is comprised of the shaft's, taper, ferrule and tip, and the rest is a combination of the forearm joint collar and pin....
Building full splice cues is a whole different beast and I have alot of respect for those particular cuemakers who specialize in their construction due to the fact that there are other contributing factors in the equation that make it a little more of a tedious process.
If you have any questions please feel free to call me anytime... I would feel more comfortable discussing this in a more candid manner due to the fact that I do NOT want to step on any regarding the practicality of the full-splice configuration.
Sincerely, Eddie Wheat 321-631-1827
Eddie....I appreciate your candor with this post. While *I* disagree as to the difference between a full and short splice, from a players standpoint, I may well be just an odd bird. Could be that I have become hyper-sensitive to vibrations, having lived in earthquake country for a while...LoL. I think for a lot of people, the 'difference' they may feel may well be in that very, very often, a FS will just feel stiffer overall, unless, of course, the shaft has been constructed in such a way as to 'soften' that perceived stiffness.
With all that said....I agree that there are those who are striving to craft the best FS humanly possible, and that yes, they are somewhat labor-intensive, and do tend to 'waste' more wood that perhaps a SS would. I have been curious however....as have seen PJ cues from the same maker as one of their custom crafted FS cues sell for higher asking prices. Am I missing something here?...as it would stand to reason that a cue that is more labor/material-intensive would command the higher asking price. This one definitely leaves me scratching my head.
Lisa