I don't normally comment on the terrible use of grammar, punctuation, spelling, incomplete and/or run on sentences, and just generally wording things exceptionally poorly and with incomplete thoughts, but when the person doing those things then turns around and criticize others with a snide remark for not being able to understand the nonsense that they wrote, as if it is the other people's fault for not being able to understand it, then I just have to say something. The problem is your lack of mastery of the english language and lack of ability to write in an understandable manner, not everyone else's lack of ability to read or understand (although there is plenty of that around here too, it just didn't apply in this case).
Below I have rewritten what you said in a way that actually makes sense in the english language and where people can easily read and understand it. This way you can see how you should have written it if you actually wanted people to be able to understand you.
"With this being the information age and all, you would think that people would be more educated than to be so worried about what cue maker's name is on a cue, or whether a cue is a custom or production model. Take a Biagio cue for example. Don't be fooled by its yellowish ferrule or ugly looks. If you get a chance to hit with one don't pass it up as it plays great. How we think of cues should be more like how we think of barbecue for example, where nobody really worries too much about who made certain barbecue, or how that barbecue looks. All that is important is how it tastes."
See how easy that is to understand compared to this: