CTE Visual Question
- Thread starter sacman
- Start date
- Status
With all due respect bbb, you don't know what you are talking about. The mods don't want any more debate about CTE and I haven't mentioned it in months, other than in a positive way to encourage sacman more recently. (Unfortunately it seems he's too immature to hear anything other than what he wants to hear.)
Spider is the expert at ratcheting everything up to Defcon 5 for no apparent reason other than he can't seem to let people have a different opinion and ignore them. My comment was directed only at him to balance out what can only be described as revisionist history. I made my point and there's no need to drag it out further.
Maybe you can direct some of your scolding toward the one guy who walks around this forum with a chip on his shoulder and can't let ANYTHING go unchallenged.
i agree spidey is in the mix of the flames
but if you guys dont post he doesnt have anything
" to ratchet up to Defcon 5 " to use your terms
just sayin
There you go twisting things again. Stan is NOT playing pool. He's doing something he's never done before in his life which is write a book along with taking hundreds of pictures to illustrate exactly what he's describing. He's also outlining what he wants to create and do in the Truth Series Videos.
There are a lot of retakes, redo's, and attempt to cover all questions that might come up from students who want to learn CTE. I don't know why. You and the rest of the gang members will be right around the corner to go off on another decade or more attack on CTE, Stan, and anybody who uses and praises it.
SICK, SICK, SICK SH*T!!
You've been trying to get forum pool players to accept what you say for the last two decades as if you're some kind of supreme authority in the world of pool.
Please do tell, what are your professional credentials and accomplishments.
Talking out of both sides of your mouth again. "The mods don't want any more debate about CTE and I haven't mentioned it in months"
And here you are invading a SPECIFIC CTE THREAD titled "CTE VISUAL QUESTION"
Isn't it a clue for you that you shouldn't even be in here to begin with if PEACE was your objective?
But NO, you come in here ATTACKING ME, STAN, SACMAN, AND BBB (Larry) and plead your case for innocence.
Hmm... holding those who burst into flames accountable for flame wars. What a novel idea for the aiming forum.
pj <- nah, too sensible
chgo
So says the man who was responsible for "flame wars" being added to Webster's Dictionary as a new word two decades ago and still going strong.
This forum is a much better place when you're given long term bans as you've been in the past.
When we say “the guy who walks around with a chip on his shoulder” and “those who burst into flames”, everybody, including you, knows who that is. It isn’t us.
pj
chgo
'Choir boys' wouldn't fit the "US" either. How about "Initiators", "antagonists", "CTE haters", "gang members", "flame war starters",
Again, this is a specific CTE thread which you have never had anything positive to discuss in two decades. Why are you in here other than post to me and continue antagonizing?
Will you do it again? I think so. You're Pat Johnson and have a reputation to live up to. It's your job.
(what can he think of next?)
I stopped posting about fractions...'they' could stop about CTE
I stopped posting about fractions and Mosconi in order to leave the fractions followers alone....seems like 'they' could stop posting about CTE and Stan Shuffett to leave the CTE followers alone as well.
Man oh man, they never quit do they?
:shakehead::shrug:
That's a pretty good question, Mister Spider. (in blue)
I stopped posting about fractions and Mosconi in order to leave the fractions followers alone....seems like 'they' could stop posting about CTE and Stan Shuffett to leave the CTE followers alone as well.
Man oh man, they never quit do they?
:shakehead::shrug:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jd9e6QCuXE
It's now a part of their DNA.
FYI, I got an email from Stan this morning stating what I posted about him, CTE, and the project was his sentiments exactly and if he did post here it would have been the same thing only stronger to a certain instigator/attacker.
These are his exact words copy and pasted here: "I’m amazed at how well you have been able to express my sentiments"
Last edited:
Your analogy is deeply flawed.
This a place to discuss aiming pool balls and nothing half as serious as religion. All you're doing is attempting to legitimize the behavior of some who behave as religious-like zealots.
All points of view should be welcome. And if the guys who behave as if even the mere mention of the name of a particular aiming system is tantamount to blasphemy, they are the ones who should avoid places where free and open (or as close as we can get to it) discussion of *all* aiming systems, approaches, and techniques takes place. If they want a "scared place" to discuss their system and only their system, they need to petition the powers that be to create and protect a forum just for them. End of problem.
But if this is still the Aiming Conversation forum then all discussions about aiming should be on the table.
Lou Figueroa
Last edited:
Wrong again.
As someone who babysat the keys and codes to 10 Minuteman ICBMs for four years I can reliably tell you that DEFCON 5 is the lowest "everyday" state of readiness. IOWs, you don't "ratchet up to DEFCON 5" because you're atready there.
The system ratchets its way up from DEFCON 5 to DEFCON 1. At DEFCON 1 it's as serious as its's going to get and basically that state of readiness means that someone is about to have a very large barbecue in their backyard.
Lou Figueroa
You need to attack your compadre Dan White, not bbb. He was the one who made the comment about ratcheting up to DEFCON 5. NOT LARRY.
And all this time I thought it was the other way around! Thanks. There are some people on TV news who have it backwards, too.
This belongs in NPR, not the aiming forum. Thanks for derailing another CTE thread. You guys just can't keep yourself interested in little virtual pool drawings can you.
- Status