"Issue.why does the format go wonky every so often. Posts are stretched off the screen?"
Someone on that page posted an oversized image.
Blame it on Hank.
"Issue.why does the format go wonky every so often. Posts are stretched off the screen?"
Someone on that page posted an oversized image.
"Issue.why does the format go wonky every so often. Posts are stretched off the screen?"
Someone on that page posted an oversized image.
I don't think a billiards site should have a "Politics" section anymore than a political site should have a "Billiards" section.
But if we can make requests, can we get a "Zoo Keeper" section?
Not saying you like it, or implying it as any kind of greed/move/fault on your part. I was talking more along the lines of it being a possible business/money decision, and I would completely understand if it were.
My apologies Mike, no insult intended.
On a high traffic tech forum I own, there's an off-topic section for just random & casual chit-chat. Then there's what's called 'the vip room', a section for politics and other sordid topics. This section isn't visible to guests (members only with 100+ posts); IE its not indexed by google and other search engines. This has worked well.....the political banter isn't seen by new members, even in the 'view new posts' link. I run VB 3.8.11, same family as this site....that'd be my suggestion if its really an issue.
Here's the fix for it if the admin here wants to install a nifty addon for vbulletin. I use it on all my forums. Keeps threads with inline images (IMG tags) from collapsing cells and/or creating widespread side scrolling chaos from lazy persons that won't resize their images because they think it's facebarf....
Site admin, this nifty little addon is fully customizable as to what size the images will display as. It doesn't alter the actual attachment, it just scales it down for display. PM me if you have any questions. It plays very nice with VB 3.8.xx. I strongly recommend it!
I downloaded this and will play with it to see how it works.
Thank you.
Mike
Blame it on Hank.
There is a vote going on now in npr. Seventeen have voted. If you feel strongly either way, vote. It’s a Stickey.
The vote/question is flawed. Its asking people who participate in that sub forum if they want a separate space. Of course they are going to say no.
The better vote would be in the main forum to see whether or not people would enjoy an NPR forum free from politics.
That way its not the few deciding for the many.
But in the end, its Mikes house, so whatever he says goes.
If a person doesn't participate in that sub-forum, how are they being "effected" by the content of a sub-forum in which they do not participate?
The vote/question is flawed. Its asking people who participate in that sub forum if they want a separate space. Of course they are going to say no.
The better vote would be in the main forum to see whether or not people would enjoy an NPR forum free from politics.
That way its not the few deciding for the many.
But in the end, its Mikes house, so whatever he says goes.
If a person doesn't participate in that sub-forum, how are they being "effected" by the content of a sub-forum in which they do not participate?