To my knowledge it is still the case that many BCAPL sactioned leagues do not report their match results to FargoRate, nor are they required to. Obviously it would be great for the players and the game if they all did (and if everybody else did too for that matter). The question is, should BCAPL make reporting all matches to FargoRate a requirement and condition for sanctioning?
On the surface this would seem to be a great idea, but perhaps they have some reasons for not wanting to require it, or at least for wanting to wait for a bit before requiring it. One or more of those reasons could even be things that we may not have thought of or that may not be obvious to those of us on the outside looking in.
I do know that because of the way they are set up, for most people it would take a little time and effort to submit all the individual match results in the format that is needed by FargoRate, and there are many people just don't want to do any more work than they have to when that is the case. Also as I recall (although I could be wrong on this) the LMS software that can automatically handle the reporting for you has a cost associated with it. Perhaps the BCAPL is concerned that if they required all leagues to report all match results to FargoRate that some leagues would choose not to be sanctioned or switch to another league if they didn't want to take on that extra work that would be required (even though it is fairly minimal) or pay for the LMS that would do it for them.
I suspect that they will require it at some point, but they wanted to wait until FargoRate was widely known and popular, and until they had their LMS in great working condition, so that there would be as little reason as possible for resistance to that idea. There is also the small possibility that CSI and/or FargoRate aren't quite ready to take steps such as those that would take their partnership to that level of permanency, because once FargoRate reporting becomes a requirement they are in certain ways linking themselves together inextricably. All the above is pure speculation on my part based on nothing more than a few conceivable possibilities, and as said they may have other reasons entirely that wouldn't be readily apparent to us. Perhaps CSI will weigh in on whether or not they intend to at some point in the future make reporting to FargoRate a requirement for sanctioning, and if that is the case, when they are guessing that might take place.
While I of course cannot speak for CSI, I do have a few comments.
(1) LMS is the only mechanism to get league data into FargoRate. There is some fraction of older non-LMS league data we were able to get in with much effort at some point in the past.
(2) There is no cost for using LMS for all BCAPL sanctioned leagues/divisions. That is, if your league sanctions with CSI at $15/player/year, you and your players get basically everything such membership has traditionally offered and also now LMS and Fargo Ratings and associated mobile APPs.
(3) LMS is ready for a broad range of league formats
--- 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 or ... player teams
--- 8-Ball, 9-Ball, or 10-Ball or a combination
--- various formats including round-robin, round-robin where you play each opponent multiple games, etc.
---scoring by game, using 10-point scoring, and using 17-point scoring
---no handicap or handicap using Fargo Ratings (or traditional handicap approaches, though I don't know why anybody would want to do that.)
LMS is recording about 40,000 games a week (4-week average) now, and that number is increasing rapidly with many new leagues and divisions being added each week.
(4) LMS cannot yet handle some formats. This includes singles (we've got some cool things in the works) and scotch doubles. We've got other cool things in the works mixing singles and scotch doubles.
(5) The relationship between FargoRate and CSI is strong, positive and productive, and there is every reason to believe that will be the case for a long time. CSI is an innovative, forward-looking organization, and we are honored to be working with them.
The pool world will be a lot better place (number and quality of events--local, regional, national, and international for players at all levels, recognition of excellence and support of pro-level pool) once nearly all league players and tournament players are coupled through LMS and other mechanisms. I am convinced of this--it is my life work.
My view is that CSI has put substantial resources toward and in some ways retooled itself in a way that helps lay the groundwork for a game-changing transformation in pool. I would not recommend to CSI that it does something purposefully that has a short-term effect of reducing its membership. There are different paths toward achieving the long-term goal. And CSI should avoid paths that involve short-term existential risk. CSI should not, imo, require every player in a tournament has an established Fargo Rating. Nor should it require, once again imo, every league division use LMS.
We hear a lot amongst local league divisions the phrase "Well, we're old school... ." And we've seen the following transformation a lot. There will be a contingent resistant to change. There will be another contingent that doesn't care. And there will be a third contingent--perhaps a smaller one--that sees and is excited by the value of Fargo Ratings and being connected to the world. This third contingent grows, makes Fargo Ratings happen, and in time the entire group is happy about it.
A pretty clear trend we are seeing is that the local weekly tournaments that have arranged getting games into FargoRate are growing and others in the same city are not. Players want it, and such player pressure is getting bigger.