I am not sure about the WPBA matches, as I have never been to one.
For other high-profile events, like U.S. Open, as an example, there are a couple hundred spectators, mainly consisting of players, friends of players, and a few locals. Even though people like us die-hard pool fans enjoy these events to the utmost, it doesn't seem to attract mainstream America as much as, say, an Orioles game at Camden Yards would.
I wonder what the audiences were like when Minnesota Fats and Willie Mosconi used to have those challenge matches. They were televised, which means that pool, at least during this era, did have a little bit of popularity. This would be a good question for me to ask Allen Hopkins next time I see him. He was there and would know the answer.
I have heard some pool enthusiasts complain about the gate fees at some tournaments, thinking they were too high. The recent autograph brouhaha on this forum seems to illustrate that the majority of pool enthusiasts believe players should sign autographs for free at all events. Yet, some of these same pool enthusiasts complain about paying the gate fee.
The Joss Northeast 9-Ball Tour event at the Turning Stone Casino is free admission. I have never seen a player turn down an autograph at Turning Stone. Even with free admission, the amount of spectators in the audience is not as high as one would hope for, maybe a couple hundred tops at any given time. This is an excellent venue for seeing pool at its finest. Yet, the free admission doesn't seem to be a good enough draw to warrant a packed house.
Independently promoted annual events are in the decline in 2007. With Glass City Open shutting its doors, the BCA pro event moving away from Vegas, it is a sign of the times.
I wish I knew what the answer would be to bring in more interest by way of attendance at pool tournaments. If the caliber of play ain't doing it, then a new concept for tournaments seems to be the answer. Would naked ladies do it?
JAM