Antique tables, How much is too much? NOW WITH PICS
Just looking for some thoughts and opinions. I'm working on a pre 1900 Brunswick. Somewhere along the line someone put Monarch Superspeeds on it and the nose is well below 1.25" Ball hop abounds. I pulled the rubber off and the face of the sub rail is narrow, about 1.2 inches. If I try to put K-55 on it it hangs off the bottom, and the nose height is wrong. Long story short the bevel needs to be fixed on it. Really it needs to be cut off, have new material glued in and cut to the proper dimensions for whatever profile i decide to go with. But when I thing about putting a big table saw blade into the 100 year old wood I kind of recoil. Something about it just feels wrong. But, it's the best way I can see to make the table correct. What are your guys opinion on this sort of thing. Thanks. Take it easy. Julio
Just looking for some thoughts and opinions. I'm working on a pre 1900 Brunswick. Somewhere along the line someone put Monarch Superspeeds on it and the nose is well below 1.25" Ball hop abounds. I pulled the rubber off and the face of the sub rail is narrow, about 1.2 inches. If I try to put K-55 on it it hangs off the bottom, and the nose height is wrong. Long story short the bevel needs to be fixed on it. Really it needs to be cut off, have new material glued in and cut to the proper dimensions for whatever profile i decide to go with. But when I thing about putting a big table saw blade into the 100 year old wood I kind of recoil. Something about it just feels wrong. But, it's the best way I can see to make the table correct. What are your guys opinion on this sort of thing. Thanks. Take it easy. Julio
Last edited: