So it no longer draws the rock 6.5 long rails? bummer...….
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87pnvL0wCLo
So it no longer draws the rock 6.5 long rails? bummer...….
The magic is a little weak if it takes skill to make it work.Scott tried the draw cue
he hit an object ball near the side pocket,the cue ball drew maybe 4 inches and proceed to look
like wykie coyote,spinning very fast in place on the new simona cloth
suddenly it took off back up table and back off the foot fail to the head rail
he did this 3 times
I personally have never seen such a thing
so Jack Potter is going to test the cue before i return it
if a good player comes to Dallas
please call
214 477 7323
no offense but i only want a high quality player to try it
In my test the OB's rebound distance depends only on the CB's speed at impact - the amount of draw on the CB doesn't affect it. That's how it can test your draw efficiency (the spin-to-speed ratio you can achieve - aka how low you can hit).a ball with less draw may rebound further then one with more draw.
Quicker and easier than video, and lots of things are easier to demonstrate when you can optimize things like speed, spin and aim to show what you want.Whats with the virtual stuff
I probably put that together at the pool hall while practicing - I do a lot of my posting here during practice breaks.you dont get off the couch anymore:grin-square:
In my test the OB's rebound distance depends only on the CB's speed at impact - the amount of draw on the CB doesn't affect it. That's how it can test your draw efficiency (the spin-to-speed ratio you can achieve - aka how low you can hit).
Quicker and easier than video, and lots of things are easier to demonstrate when you can optimize things like speed, spin and aim to show what you want.
I probably put that together at the pool hall while practicing - I do a lot of my posting here during practice breaks.
pj
chgo
Virtual Pool's physics are surprisingly accurate for the most part - I've done this test before on pool tables and the results shown here don't obviously defy reality, but they are probably about the best that could be achieved (because the simulation can easily be set to optimal tip offset, stroke speed, aim, etc.).I dont play the virtual game so I don't know how "real" the results are
Still think to end the controversy on the cue... you need to let someone like
Dr-Dave-Billiards test the cue or someone like him... & it needs to go thru a
bunch of tests ON VIDEO to prove if it draws better then a normal cue...
Just my humble opinion...
By the way --- Happy Birthday Dean!!!
you just have to use common sense to realize that no special cue is going to do anything much greater than any other cue that looks similar.
just like no golf club is going to hit a ball twice as far or even much farther as another similar one.
Aside from squirt, I think the only cue quality that physically matters is power transference, which simply allows slightly less stroke speed.you just have to use common sense to realize that no special cue is going to do anything much greater than any other cue that looks similar.
Still problems with your model. I dont play the virtual game so I don't know how "real" the results are
I am not ridiculing the virtual game I just am not familiar with it.