What is so wrong with taking advantage of the margin for error?

BC21

https://www.playpoolbetter.com
Gold Member
Silver Member
Here is a video showing a few shots that take advantage of the ob's margin for error going cleanly into the pocket, its acceptable "window" into the pocket. Though it's good to practice for precision, the main goal when it comes to pocketing balls is having the ob go into the pocket. The more we can do this, the more games we can win and the better our chances are for running out.
Eventually we begin to fine tune our precision/accuracy, but I think it's beneficial to be able to get the balls into the holes first.

https://youtu.be/VrGK9PsA_Z0
 

SpiderWebComm

HelpImBeingOppressed
Silver Member
Here is a video showing a few shots that take advantage of the ob's margin for error going cleanly into the pocket, its acceptable "window" into the pocket. Though it's good to practice for precision, the main goal when it comes to pocketing balls is having the ob go into the pocket. The more we can do this, the more games we can win and the better our chances are for running out.
Eventually we begin to fine tune our precision/accuracy, but I think it's beneficial to be able to get the balls into the holes first.

https://youtu.be/VrGK9PsA_Z0

Right past the 35 second mark it looks to me like you could (should) use the inlay and points at the end of it in your cue butt to aim. Almost like cheating with the "sights" built in. LOL
 

BC21

https://www.playpoolbetter.com
Gold Member
Silver Member
Right past the 35 second mark it looks to me like you could (should) use the inlay and points at the end of it in your cue butt to aim. Almost like cheating with the "sights" built in. LOL

:thumbup: My whole reason for thr Mezz with arrowhead points!! Lol

Do people actually look at the cue's forearm while in full stance? If so, that would be a good place for a sticker that reads, "Nothing to see here. Look at the cue ball (or object ball, or both), but don't look here."
 

SpiderWebComm

HelpImBeingOppressed
Silver Member
:thumbup: My whole reason for thr Mezz with arrowhead points!! Lol

Do people actually look at the cue's forearm while in full stance? If so, that would be a good place for a sticker that reads, "Nothing to see here. Look at the cue ball (or object ball, or both), but don't look here."

Never! I have to look down to see what cue I'm using. Some of the old timers used to make a line or more on their ferrule and supposedly aimed with it. I never tried it. Have you?

Doesn't matter. The edge of CB is the way to go now.
 

BC21

https://www.playpoolbetter.com
Gold Member
Silver Member
Never! I have to look down to see what cue I'm using. Some of the old timers used to make a line or more on their ferrule and supposedly aimed with it. I never tried it. Have you?

Doesn't matter. The edge of CB is the way to go now.

I've seen where some players have a black line on the ferrule but never used anything like that. It would annoy me to see any lines on my ferrule or shaft. I don't think it's difficult to visualize the center line of the shaft as I'm looking down the down shot. And I do see the benefits of using the cb edge to help align thinner shots, like a quarter ball hit or thinner.
 

Low500

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Never! I have to look down to see what cue I'm using. Some of the old timers used to make a line or more on their ferrule and supposedly aimed with it. I never tried it. Have you?
Doesn't matter. The edge of CB is the way to go now.
Good morning to you SpiderMan,:thumbup2:
The first time I saw Lassiter, he and another road agent came through Atlanta in either 1954 or 1955 and took on Danny Jones and then Joe Cosgrove at Big Town Billiards downtown. Lassiter busted everyone giving out terrific spots too.
A group of us kids (you could get into pool rooms back then at 16, if you had a signed notarized statement from your parents giving it the ok, otherwise you had to be 18) surrounded Lassiter and he showed us the line he had drawn on his ferrule.
Back then magic markers hadn't even been invented, so the lines was done using a fountain pen filled with black India ink so it would stick.
He used the line to point clearer at at the fractions and then would give the cue a very, very, slight rotation in the proper direction for a touch of outside English to offset throw. Then he pulled the trigger. For reverse English he aimed the line at the fraction and then used a backhand pivot to produce the angle.
It caught on for a while around town and then faded away. I kept using it, all my life, and still use it today.
The beauty of using it today is with ProOne it more efficiently defines the shotline from the original perception (the bozos here in the "Dan White Posse" won't understand the difference in the aiming line and the shotline, since they don't use the edge of the cueball, but you will). Using ProOne, we don't have to worry about throw or cling....the system takes care of all that.
In Basic Manual CTE, another use: A 30 degree hit, for example. Setup on the edge of the OB with the line rotated to one tip of outside English, then rotate back to center cue ball and you're dead on the money.
The line guarantees that when you do need English on a shot, you only use one tip maximum, and are provided a very definitive visual reference. Again just another 'edge' to up the percentages.
You can imagine how that line helps today when shooting at those 45 and 60 perceptions where you're "shooting out into blank space". Vastly superior to some goofy fractional method, you know.
Attached picture shows the room where it all started for me. I saw some of the greatest walk up those stairs....and a lot of them walked back down flat broke too.
Regards,
P.L.
FivePointsCropped[2].jpg
 

SpiderWebComm

HelpImBeingOppressed
Silver Member
Good morning to you SpiderMan,:thumbup2:
The first time I saw Lassiter, he and another road agent came through Atlanta in either 1954 or 1955 and took on Danny Jones and then Joe Cosgrove at Big Town Billiards downtown. Lassiter busted everyone giving out terrific spots too.
A group of us kids (you could get into pool rooms back then at 16, if you had a signed notarized statement from your parents giving it the ok, otherwise you had to be 18) surrounded Lassiter and he showed us the line he had drawn on his ferrule.
Back then magic markers hadn't even been invented, so the lines was done using a fountain pen filled with black India ink so it would stick.
He used the line to point clearer at at the fractions and then would give the cue a very, very, slight rotation in the proper direction for a touch of outside English to offset throw. Then he pulled the trigger. For reverse English he aimed the line at the fraction and then used a backhand pivot to produce the angle.
It caught on for a while around town and then faded away. I kept using it, all my life, and still use it today.
The beauty of using it today is with ProOne it more efficiently defines the shotline from the original perception (the bozos here in the "Dan White Posse" won't understand the difference in the aiming line and the shotline, since they don't use the edge of the cueball, but you will). Using ProOne, we don't have to worry about throw or cling....the system takes care of all that.
In Basic Manual CTE, another use: A 30 degree hit, for example. Setup on the edge of the OB with the line rotated to one tip of outside English, then rotate back to center cue ball and you're dead on the money.
The line guarantees that when you do need English on a shot, you only use one tip maximum, and are provided a very definitive visual reference. Again just another 'edge' to up the percentages.
You can imagine how that line helps today when shooting at those 45 and 60 perceptions where you're "shooting out into blank space". Vastly superior to some goofy fractional method, you know.
Attached picture shows the room where it all started for me. I saw some of the greatest walk up those stairs....and a lot of them walked back down flat broke too.
Regards,
P.L.
View attachment 544532

What a fantastic classic picture!
 

SpiderWebComm

HelpImBeingOppressed
Silver Member
And I do see the benefits of using the cb edge to help align thinner shots, like a quarter ball hit or thinner.

Edges help alignment and work across the entire OB. Nothing jumps out with more clarity than the edge of the white ball against any color or area of an OB.

CTE is Center To Edge. ETC is Edge To Center. If you have a perfect CTE you'll also have a perfect ETC. For a pure 1/2 ball hit or aim it's a great cross reference check to use both in case something is a hair off. I see edges clearer as opposed to two fat or thick inner parts of the balls being lined up to each other.
 
Last edited:

Dan White

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
The beauty of using it today is with ProOne it more efficiently defines the shotline from the original perception (the bozos here in the "Dan White Posse" won't understand the difference in the aiming line and the shotline, since they don't use the edge of the cueball, but you will). Using ProOne, we don't have to worry about throw or cling....the system takes care of all that.

How do you adjust for different shot speeds?
 

BC21

https://www.playpoolbetter.com
Gold Member
Silver Member
Edges help alignment and work across the entire OB. Nothing jumps out with more clarity than the edge of the white ball against any color or area of an OB.

CTE is Center To Edge. ETC is Edge To Center. If you have a perfect CTE you'll also have a perfect ETC. For a pure 1/2 ball hit or aim it's a great cross reference check to use both in case something is a hair off. I see edges clearer as opposed to two fat or thick inner parts of the balls being lined up to each other.

I understand. But I don't view the balls as "fat". I see them as simple 2D circles with well defined widths/diameters. The fractions are based on the diameter of the circle, not the fat circumference of the ball, so I don't have to concern myself with lining up fat/thick parts of the balls. It doesn't have to be that complicated.

Even for CTE users the fat circumference of the ob is not considered. You are using the basic quarters as defined by the visual width of the ball, a simple circle split veritcally in quarter increments. The fact that the balls are spheres really has no impact on a fractional aim line or a CTE or ETA/B/C line.

In fact, it could be said that any aiming method which uses ob quarters or fractions is really only utilizing a straight line that is 2.25" long. For fractional aiming this line can be split into quarters or eighths or whatever. With CTE the quarter increments of this 2.25" line are used.

The balls are spheres/circles, but when using quarter increments the aiming involves nothing but a straight horizontal line across the middle of the ball, as shown in this illustration. The rest of the ball, its outer convex surface, determines where it goes when the cb hits it, but that portion of the ball is useless when aiming at the quarters or any other fractional increment. The outer surface of the ball is important when using contact points or ghostball, because the reference points are on the outer surface of that fat ball, not based on the simple 2.25" width of the ball.

picture.php
 

SpiderWebComm

HelpImBeingOppressed
Silver Member
I think it's a case of "to each their own".

Over the course of my pool playing lifetime I've used every type of direct visual or imaginary visual ever invented.

I have to say, with enough time and practice they were all pretty effective.

Contact points; equal and opposite contact points; fractions, CB to OB telescoped impact position; lights; pivot systems with large offset to start; shadows; base of ball; ferrule parts; CTE/ETC;
Shish Kabob; and I'm sure some are being left out.

FOR ME, I see the edge of CB onto different parts of the OB better than any and all of the rest.

Since I have used all of the others very long lengths of time, I know what suits me best. Is it for everyone? To be determined by the individual. Noting I care to debate.

At this point there's nothing else I have to add than go back to the first sentence in this post.
 

duckie

GregH
Silver Member
Here is a video showing a few shots that take advantage of the ob's margin for error going cleanly into the pocket, its acceptable "window" into the pocket. Though it's good to practice for precision, the main goal when it comes to pocketing balls is having the ob go into the pocket. The more we can do this, the more games we can win and the better our chances are for running out.
Eventually we begin to fine tune our precision/accuracy, but I think it's beneficial to be able to get the balls into the holes first.

https://youtu.be/VrGK9PsA_Z0

You forget position play.........being able to put the OB in any part of the pocket helps to make angles off the OB needed to put the CB where you want.

Putting the balls where you want needs to be practiced from day one.
 

SpiderWebComm

HelpImBeingOppressed
Silver Member
Like I said, it's impossible (have a friend explain that to you).

pj
chgo

I was under the impression the back and forth lizard head movement was the problem solver that made everything possible. I know some guys (may be singular) who say they use it effectively.

No?
 
Top