The 3 hit the 6 - but the 6 was frozen against the rail.
Is that a legal hit?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbEIYL53mmA&feature=youtu.be&t=1384
Is that a legal hit?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbEIYL53mmA&feature=youtu.be&t=1384
The 3 hit the 6 - but the 6 was frozen against the rail.
Is that a legal hit?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbEIYL53mmA&feature=youtu.be&t=1384
The six was not frozen to the rail. Had it been so, the referee would have had to announce it in advance for it to be treated as frozen to the rail under the rules. There was no such announcement. It was not a foul.
You'll notice at about 23:00 that the referee correctly walks to the other side of the table to check for a frozen ball. That's how a good referee handles it.
The 6 could have been off the rail enough to see from where the ref and players were. I think they could see better than we can on the video. Alex didn't let out a peep. Alex was free to call for a ruling before the shot. If it was frozen it was a mistake on everyone at the table.Bullshit, the referee never check on that 6 ball. From the way the 6 ball rolled after the break (if you can analyze the screen when it hit the rail and back) 99% it's frozen. Had the referee check that 6, it would'd been a foul.
The 3 hit the 6 - but the 6 was frozen against the rail.
Is that a legal hit?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbEIYL53mmA&feature=youtu.be&t=1384
In order to check that 6 ball the ref need to put his hand over shadow it, that's how close it was. Which he never did. No one would know for sure now, but from the way it rolled, most likely it's rail frozen.
It is officially a legal hit since no one check the 6 or would think the 6 would be hit. My point was the ref never check on that 6 ball and it most likely an unofficial foul.
And it would be unlikely for the ref to even consider the 6 from where Ko was kicking from.
The referee was looking at the 6 when the 3 hit it.
True.
But it would have been too late to call a foul then.
If I were the ref I never would have thought of checking the 6 before the shot.
The 3 hit the 6 - but the 6 was frozen against the rail.
Is that a legal hit?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbEIYL53mmA&feature=youtu.be&t=1384
The 3 hit the 6 - but the 6 was frozen against the rail.
Is that a legal hit?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbEIYL53mmA&feature=youtu.be&t=1384
It's the opponent's responsibility to call a ball frozen.
If he doesn't it's treated as not frozen.
4. An object ball is not considered frozen to a cushion unless it is declared frozen immediately prior to the shot and before the shooter is down on the shot.
As per rule 1-19(4) of the CSI rules in effect here,
Since no such ruling was made, the ball is not considered frozen so it's a legal hit. Looking at it carefully it looks like the 6 ball moved after it was hit so it probably want's frozen anyway.
8.4 Driven to a Rail
A ball is said to be driven to a rail if it is not touching that rail and then touches that rail. A ball touching a rail at the start of a shot (said to be “frozen” to the rail) is not considered driven to that rail unless it leaves the rail and returns. A ball that is pocketed or driven off the table is also considered to have been driven to a rail. A ball is assumed not to be frozen to any rail unless it is declared frozen by the referee, the shooter, or the opponent. See also Regulation 29, Calling Frozen Balls.
Those are actually the league rules. This event goes by WPA rules, which does have the same rule on balls on the rail: