Authorities are re examining the Surber case.
https://www.wlox.com/2019/12/06/col...ClQoc1ROjc1VcYtBhfBWClh1mZzuEWSHKomljtq2EFqHg
https://www.wlox.com/2019/12/06/col...ClQoc1ROjc1VcYtBhfBWClh1mZzuEWSHKomljtq2EFqHg
Sadly the killer, or killers have never been caught, tried, and convicted. Thousands of people in the U.S.A., are killed annually, many more cases go unsolved then solved.
JMHO
Sadly the killer, or killers have never been caught, tried, and convicted. Thousands of people in the U.S.A., are killed annually, many more cases go unsolved then solved.
JMHO
Nice. Present claims of fact and add the JMHO.
Wtf?! :slap:
The guy MAY have been inside and MAY have been paroled/released. Mike got killed by a douchebag pos., prison or no prison. All the conjecture here serves ZERO purpose. I find it a bit odd that if this a-hole spends that much time around pool that he hasn't been spotted and questioned. This case is already cold and getting colder.I'd bet my next retirement check the killer is a former inmate. Just because a person hasn't been convicted of a violent crime doesn't mean he hasn't committed one.
Mike Surber died because that killer was released from prison.
The national murder solve rate is 39% and the lowest since records were kept. In the old days they'd convict the first guy who looked good for it. Nowadays-Video and DNA are clearing those people more than convicting them.
was fully expecting the topic would be about a pool cue case. And then John Barton saying it's inferior.
I was not challenging the statistics. They are indicative of a system that would rather see an guilty man go free, than an innocent man convicted.
I was highlighting the absurdity of presenting facts and then stating they're opinion.
The national murder solve rate is 39% and the lowest since records were kept. In the old days they'd convict the first guy who looked good for it. Nowadays-Video and DNA are clearing those people more than convicting them.
Nice. Present claims of fact and add the JMHO.
Wtf?! :slap:
Also, it might be that thankfully there are just a lot fewer homicides today than 25 years ago, and the remaining ones are tougher cases to solve?
Are you sure you don’t have that backwards, that 39% is the UNsolved homicide rate? I don’t think it’s true that “many more cases go unsolved than solved” as was stated above. I do agree with you that the clearance rate has gone down, and it might be because they’ve gotten pressure to be more accurate. Also, it might be that thankfully there are just a lot fewer homicides today than 25 years ago, and the remaining ones are tougher cases to solve?
Nice. Present claims of fact and add the JMHO.
Wtf?! :slap:
Most homicides are still done by people known to the victim and often by family members. Totally random murders definitely do happen but not as much. Based on FBI #'s its usually in the 10-12% range.I think a larger percentage of murders these days compared to golden times are random killings as opposed to the old came home and found the wife in bed with the neighbor and you blew both of their heads off. Chance occurrences are harder to pin down. I have no proof of this but it just seems that way when you watch the news. Which I rarely do, so who knows if I'm making sense. I grew up two towns over from Biloxi so I want to see this guy caught and fried.
Most homicides are still done by people known to the victim and often by family members. Totally random murders definitely do happen but not as much. Based on FBI #'s its usually in the 10-12% range.