Scott, I didn't go back to reread everything in the post as I am close to putting mine together soon and have quick question! while assembling I recall it being recommended that the long skirts be cut in half to simplify the reconstruction? did you do that or leave them in one long section?
thaks
Good God NO!!!!
The only recommendation related to the aprons in to cut the BRACKET, and If I'm not mistaken Steve (the mech that put Scott and my tables together) recommended 3 parts, not two.
I didn't do this on my table and Steve did have to wrestle with on side to get it attached.
Thank you, sir! This pic sums it up.
****I epoxied the pieces back together****
Make a divider now to put in and take out if you play any one pocket at all.
Then you don’t have to worry about the balls getting mixed up from each side. The balls made in my pocket stay in the tray on my side and I guess if you made any they would stay on your side. ��
BTW, I liked the seam too, that's why I kept it. It adds something, at bit of natural maybe?...Thanks, Glen!
I like the seam!
I think you and any mechanic who has ever worked on a GCI or II. They really aren't that bad as they are a part of the apron once installed and they don't take much work aside from taking the screws out of the brackets that fasten the assembly to the frame. They actually do have an aesthetic function: they hide the bottom of the pocket liners on drop pocket tables and they hide the ball return tracks on ball return tables. Brunswick remedied this with the GCIII and its wide(r) aprons at the corners. I think they are paramount in the overall design of the GCI and II. I can understand the function over form philosophy when it comes to a pool room but in a home environment, I wouldn't want a skirtless GCI. To my eye, it looks incomplete without them.Is it just me that hated those plastic skirts that went underneath the aprons on a GC? They were a hassle to take off and put back on when recovering a table so I just left them off in my poolrooms. Never bothered me asthetically and none of my custmores even noticed.
I totally concur on that. Mechanics may not care for them, but the aesthetic adds to the mid century modern look of the table, which is its era. I like the look, a lot. But for a pool hall environment it could have been simplified without them.I think you and any mechanic who has ever worked on a GCI or II. They really aren't that bad as they are a part of the apron once installed and they don't take much work aside from taking the screws out of the brackets that fasten the assembly to the frame. They actually do have an aesthetic function: they hide the bottom of the pocket liners on drop pocket tables and they hide the ball return tracks on ball return tables. Brunswick remedied this with the GCIII and its wide(r) aprons at the corners. I think they are paramount in the overall design of the GCI and II. I can understand the function over form philosophy when it comes to a pool room but in a home environment, I wouldn't want a skirtless GCI. To my eye, it looks incomplete without them.
I agree completely. My GC1 is skirtless and it's also stained (hark!). I appreciate the retro too it's just not important in my house.Is it just me that hated those plastic skirts that went underneath the aprons on a GC? They were a hassle to take off and put back on when recovering a table so I just left them off in my poolrooms. Never bothered me asthetically and none of my customers even noticed.
Is it just me that hated those plastic skirts that went underneath the aprons on a GC? They were a hassle to take off and put back on when recovering a table so I just left them off in my poolrooms. Never bothered me asthetically and none of my customers even noticed.
I agree completely. My GC1 is skirtless and it's also stained (hark!). I appreciate the retro too it's just not important in my house.
Here's why the skirts add to the aesthetics of the design and IMO are necessary on the I and II. Who wats to look at the ugly gully system?Personal preference I guess… but I’m with Helfert and like them better skirtless too. Mine is. I think it’s possibly even more mid-century modern like that.