Krupa, you summarize the poll as a single question....."Does an instructor's playing ability impact your willingness to take lessons?
If the intent was to ask that question, then why not simply pose that question like the vast majority of threads on this site?
Instead it was presented as a yes or no proposition.
Yes: How can someone teach what they can't do themselves?
No: Teaching ability and the ability to communicate effectively trumps playing ability
The poll offers only two options and if you read most of the responses, you probably noticed that many people fell distinctly on one side or the other.
Either they can or they can't. Such is the nature of a two option poll.
That being the case, any strong player would be hugely disadvantaged to believe that only an instructor who plays better than themselves can teach them anything.
Even a modest level of integrative thinking would suggest that there would be very few instructors who would qualify for strong players who held this belief.
That's why it's a terrible proposition for strong players who will only take lessons from stronger instructors and that's why I suggest they simply go to a pro if they think that way.
After all, if you're in that mindset, what are you going to do when you surpass your instructors abilities? It would seem then that any level of knowledge the instructor may possess would be irrelevant.
You are now a stronger "performer". Despite the fact that the player may be practicing 10-15+ hours a week while the instructor may not practice at all.
It is insulting to qualified instructors to be confronted with the proposition that their knowledge and teaching skills are trumped by the illusion that physical ability is tied to credibility.
If the intent was to ask that question, then why not simply pose that question like the vast majority of threads on this site?
Instead it was presented as a yes or no proposition.
Yes: How can someone teach what they can't do themselves?
No: Teaching ability and the ability to communicate effectively trumps playing ability
The poll offers only two options and if you read most of the responses, you probably noticed that many people fell distinctly on one side or the other.
Either they can or they can't. Such is the nature of a two option poll.
That being the case, any strong player would be hugely disadvantaged to believe that only an instructor who plays better than themselves can teach them anything.
Even a modest level of integrative thinking would suggest that there would be very few instructors who would qualify for strong players who held this belief.
That's why it's a terrible proposition for strong players who will only take lessons from stronger instructors and that's why I suggest they simply go to a pro if they think that way.
After all, if you're in that mindset, what are you going to do when you surpass your instructors abilities? It would seem then that any level of knowledge the instructor may possess would be irrelevant.
You are now a stronger "performer". Despite the fact that the player may be practicing 10-15+ hours a week while the instructor may not practice at all.
It is insulting to qualified instructors to be confronted with the proposition that their knowledge and teaching skills are trumped by the illusion that physical ability is tied to credibility.
Last edited:
