Wags: The tournament didn't fill and therefore the prize fund is less than in years past, but as long as every player paid their entry fee and the tournament pays out all the winnings, no money is "missing".
Your claim of missing money is like expecting a raise at work, dreaming of ways to spend that extra money, but then not getting the raise, and complaining about "losing" money.
Yes, I understand your bigger implications (pros vs. "dead money", ABP demanding seeding, amateurs not wanting seeding etc.). These issues seem to be coming to a head. What the exact impacts will be remains to be seen.
As far as how the prize money will be distributed now that there's $18,500 less in the pot, that remains to be seen, too. Unless the tournament was advertised with guaranteed dollar amounts for certain places, it just makes sense to lower all the pay outs just a little bit. If the top pay outs aren't affected, then you definitely have a valid complaint.
Your claim of missing money is like expecting a raise at work, dreaming of ways to spend that extra money, but then not getting the raise, and complaining about "losing" money.
Yes, I understand your bigger implications (pros vs. "dead money", ABP demanding seeding, amateurs not wanting seeding etc.). These issues seem to be coming to a head. What the exact impacts will be remains to be seen.
As far as how the prize money will be distributed now that there's $18,500 less in the pot, that remains to be seen, too. Unless the tournament was advertised with guaranteed dollar amounts for certain places, it just makes sense to lower all the pay outs just a little bit. If the top pay outs aren't affected, then you definitely have a valid complaint.