Bravo to Billiards Digest and Mike Panozzo for writing an excellent article about the state of pool in North America and how the BCA is handling it.
I think Mike Panozzo *gets it.* I have not been a fan of much of the billiard fourth estate due to their prejudicial reporting over the years, but, by George, Billiards Digest is telling it like it is, with no fear of any repercussions from the almighty Oz -- I mean BCA. :grin-square:
According to the article, here's a snippet of the current BCA logic:
Smaller board. Smaller offices. Smaller minds.
The board’s mindset these days seems to be, “We have $700,000 in the bank. If we don’t spend a dime outside the trade show, which currently is the BCA’s sole revenue producer, we can sustain the association longer.”
Then there's this little nugget:
Which brings me to BankShot Entertainment. Last year the BCA, realizing it could no longer rely solely on the trade show, engaged the help of Strike Ten Entertainment to create a meaningful benefits program for billiard rooms, while at the same time developing a revenue stream for the BCA. That was BankShot Entertainment. Through STE, the BCA gained national partnerships with Coca-Cola, First Data merchant services and Sysco food services. It was a big-picture idea — increasing room memberships, re-connecting with players, attracting outside-industry business partners, adding bodies and relevance to the Expo — that addressed the association’s mission...and future.
The BCA says it spent $240,000 on BankShot in 2010, and, quite frankly, the results were miserable. I know, because I was part of the BSE effort. The rollout took too long. Expectations were unreasonably high. The cost was high.
Here's the link: BD article about BCA by Mike Panozzo, April 2011. [Retrieved 25 March 2011]
The UPA was removed from representing American male pros when they failed. Well, now it's time to say bye-bye to the BCA, IMHO. This is the same BCA that sent Germany's Thorsten Hohmann to the recent WPA-sanctioned tournament overseas. Who is behind the curtain at the BCA making these kinds of decisions?
American pool needs a transparent industry organization, not this kind of activity where decisions are made in secret.
Bravo to Billiards Digest for speaking the truth. I am renewing my subscription to BD today.
I think Mike Panozzo *gets it.* I have not been a fan of much of the billiard fourth estate due to their prejudicial reporting over the years, but, by George, Billiards Digest is telling it like it is, with no fear of any repercussions from the almighty Oz -- I mean BCA. :grin-square:
According to the article, here's a snippet of the current BCA logic:
Smaller board. Smaller offices. Smaller minds.
The board’s mindset these days seems to be, “We have $700,000 in the bank. If we don’t spend a dime outside the trade show, which currently is the BCA’s sole revenue producer, we can sustain the association longer.”
Then there's this little nugget:
Which brings me to BankShot Entertainment. Last year the BCA, realizing it could no longer rely solely on the trade show, engaged the help of Strike Ten Entertainment to create a meaningful benefits program for billiard rooms, while at the same time developing a revenue stream for the BCA. That was BankShot Entertainment. Through STE, the BCA gained national partnerships with Coca-Cola, First Data merchant services and Sysco food services. It was a big-picture idea — increasing room memberships, re-connecting with players, attracting outside-industry business partners, adding bodies and relevance to the Expo — that addressed the association’s mission...and future.
The BCA says it spent $240,000 on BankShot in 2010, and, quite frankly, the results were miserable. I know, because I was part of the BSE effort. The rollout took too long. Expectations were unreasonably high. The cost was high.
Here's the link: BD article about BCA by Mike Panozzo, April 2011. [Retrieved 25 March 2011]
The UPA was removed from representing American male pros when they failed. Well, now it's time to say bye-bye to the BCA, IMHO. This is the same BCA that sent Germany's Thorsten Hohmann to the recent WPA-sanctioned tournament overseas. Who is behind the curtain at the BCA making these kinds of decisions?
American pool needs a transparent industry organization, not this kind of activity where decisions are made in secret.
Bravo to Billiards Digest for speaking the truth. I am renewing my subscription to BD today.