Yeah, but since the only thing about a stick that affects its "accuracy" is CB deflection, that's likely what you asked about.
pj
chgo
I didn’t actually ask about anything, but that aside, I suppose that Predator could be using the word “accuracy” to refer to the amount of deflection produced by each shaft. Before jumping to that conclusion, however, I think one has to consider the possibility that it was intended to mean something else - perhaps the consistency of CB travel (after being hit with the same amount of English, at the same speed) over a series of test shots. Perhaps it was intended to mean both the amount of deflection and the consistency of CB travel. Or something else. Maybe it is just a marketing claim that has no valid data behind it and therefore has no real meaning.
Speculation about what “accuracy” was intended to mean is complicated by the fact that for all but the 314 shaft, there is a claimed correlation between “accuracy” and “spin at high speed” and “spin at low speed.” For the 314, that same claimed correlation is not present - at either high speed or low speed.
Also, the graphical presentation suggests that the properties of the Revo shaft are the same for the 12.4 and 12.9 models, even though the narrative states that the two models have different tapers. And, while I have not played with either of them, let alone both of them, a number of posters have weighed in to say that the deflection produced by the two models is discernibly, if not markedly, different.
Finally, a point of ignorance and therefore question on my part: Does it make sense that a shaft that produces less deflection than another shaft would also produce more spin than the other shaft (assuming the same tip type, condition, and placement, and the same speed of stroke, using the same cue butt, etc., etc. - i.e., with normalization of all other factors)? This is what Predator claims about the Revo shaft.
