I can't imagine there is any mystery left to deflection after two or more decades of research. So far you have made some claims without proof, such as the idea that one can change the duration of tip to ball contact significantly, when the average duration of contact is a swift .001 seconds.
You also wrote:
“In my view I think the cueball deflects because the cueball leaves the tip while the shaft is bent. My Idea allows the shaft to bend pack at the proper time to send the CB on the shot line.”
What you ‘think’ is the cause of deflection is incorrect, therefore your entire set assumptions, and anything that follows from them, are also incorrect.
Bob Jewett did an experiment with a 12,000 frames per second camera, and discussed the cause of deflection quite well back in 1999. Since then, manufacturers have taken his explanation to heart, and built a myriad of varieties of low-deflection shafts which all have the quality he defined in 1999.
Also, the tip-to-ball contact duration is .001 seconds. Since the ball leaves the tip faster than the cue is moving, there is no way to change that duration of contact significantly, though a super-slow stroke might make a measurable difference.
I could easily challenge more of your mistaken ideas, but I think this might be a troll, and you appear to have abandoned your own thread, so I won’t bother.
http://www.sfbilliards.com/articles/1999.pdf