p1noy said:Was he sober when he said that?
Dawgie said:In a thread some time ago you mentioned that you were making more and more cues in the 60" range b/c you have found that 58" standard cue is too short for many people.
Could you elaborate on that comment and what do you base our findings on?
ShootingArts said:Except for when someone is moving back on a stick to gain extra reach on a big table it doesn't really matter if a stick is 58" or 60" long, what matters is the balance point. I don't like wraps because I don't like the feel of two different materials under my hand. Without a wrap, I move back and forth on my sixty inch cue as needed. It is balanced a bit forward so that last two inches is really just a permanent extension on the cue.
I once preferred a lot of space between my bridge and my grip hand. However I notice that many very good players typically hit the cue ball "late" with their grip hand actually in front of 90 degrees to the cue. Seems likely there is a reason for this, I'm still trying to figure it out though!
Hu
poolplayer2093 said:now this it doesn't matter if the cue is 60 inches stuff is BS man. imagine if you take a meucci which measures like .830 at the joint and chopped an inch off of each side put another tip on it and played with it. it would stiffen up the hit a lot. now if you take another cue that's .850 and lenthen it out (keeping the joint size the same) and the cue will flex a lot more.
it's like shaking a ruler and shaking a yard stick. the amount of flex varies. which in turn will change the way the cue plays
ShootingArts said:I have a lot of imagination. I can imagine doing all kinds of stupid things. However I also can make a sixty inch stick that you can't tell from a fifty-eight inch stick by the way it plays. Since you called what I said BS, are you willing to put some real money where your overloaded butt is?
Hu
poolplayer2093 said:sounds like you took that pretty personal? relax big fella it's just an opinion
ShootingArts said:I have a lot of imagination. I can imagine doing all kinds of stupid things. However I also can make a sixty inch stick that you can't tell from a fifty-eight inch stick by the way it plays. Since you called what I said BS, are you willing to put some real money where your overloaded butt is?
Hu
poolplayer2093 said:besides i didn't say it couldn't be done.
poolplayer2093 said:now this it doesn't matter if the cue is 60 inches stuff is BS man.
poolplayer2093 said:and even if we did bet i'd say i could tell just to win the bet. hit being subjective and all there's no right or wrong. but if all things are kept the same and just length were to be changed it would play differently.
ShootingArts said:Actually you did.
I can set up a blind test with ten cues and make a total ass out of you since you wouldn't have a clue which were which length. The window remains open.
If I balance them the same from the tip you won't be able to tell which one has an extra two inches behind your grip hand. Cut with exactly the same diameters and tapers I can easily make the sixty inch cue play stiffer than the fifty-eight inch cue also. There really isn't that much difference in the way a cue plays when you add an extra inch to the shaft and butt in the basic design of the cue. My sixty inch cue has a balance point 21 inches from the butt. No accident that this equates to a 58 inch stick with the common 19 inch balance point. The extra two inches in the back means nothing until I need a little extra reach on a nine footer.
Hu
ShootingArts said:Actually you did.
I can set up a blind test with ten cues and make a total ass out of you since you wouldn't have a clue which were which length. The window remains open.
If I balance them the same from the tip you won't be able to tell which one has an extra two inches behind your grip hand. Cut with exactly the same diameters and tapers I can easily make the sixty inch cue play stiffer than the fifty-eight inch cue also. There really isn't that much difference in the way a cue plays when you add an extra inch to the shaft and butt in the basic design of the cue. My sixty inch cue has a balance point 21 inches from the butt. No accident that this equates to a 58 inch stick with the common 19 inch balance point. The extra two inches in the back means nothing until I need a little extra reach on a nine footer.
Hu