On a seperate note why does Raj think he is box office? He is no where near. I agree put Hohmann, Svb, Appleton, Orcullo against Ronnie then that struly the best of each.
Snooker is a lot more difficult than pool. Set up a rack of 9ball on a snooker table. Tell me if running is out is more difficult than on a pool table.
Because I think his cue ball control and accuracy are better than Raj's. I think shot for shot Ronnie is the better cueist. So over a lengthy match Ronnie will make less mistakes and that will be the difference is my prediction.
And yes this has a bit to do with Ronnie being a world class snooker player.
I don't think its murky at all. Snooker is a tougher game than pool. Plain and simple. You have a much lower margian or error in snooker. Ask yourself this, why do pro snooker players move over to pool and have huge success but not once has a pro pool player become a pro snooker player?
My pick in this match would be Raj. The transition to pool, as Ronnie found out when he tried to play on the IPT, is not so simple.
If Ronnie were to play the likes of Shane, Dennis or Darren, he would, in my opinion, be crushed in a race to fifteen.
On a seperate note why does Raj think he is box office? .
One billion Indians.
Even backers and cue collectors think they can play pool sometimes, he's just confusing Ronnie's enormous following with his 0 following.
I don't think its murky at all. Snooker is a tougher game than pool. Plain and simple. You have a much lower margian or error in snooker. Ask yourself this, why do pro snooker players move over to pool and have huge success but not once has a pro pool player become a pro snooker player?
Mark Selby was a professional pool player and won the English pool world title before he became famous at snooker.